Town Square

Post a New Topic

PUBLIC AGENDA: historic preservation, 385 Sherman Ave.

Original post made on Jul 1, 2014



Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, June 27, 2014, 7:49 AM

Comments (5)

Posted by Palo Alto Native, a resident of College Terrace
on Jul 1, 2014 at 10:20 am

Do not approve the 385 Sherman commercial building expansion. If the owner wants to upgrade his/her site with a new building, all good. But to expand to 55,000 square feet, three stories, and underground parking- no way. Another example of overdevelopment, more traffic, more employees coming to Palo Alto, and more ABAG pressures for us to build stack and pack housing structures to meet the housing to job imbalance. The city council must not approve any commercial expansions. Or, our new city council will set the new tone of our city and reverse any decisions with referendums until they retake the city this November! And not a day too late!


Posted by Are They Deaf, or What?, a resident of Mayfield
on Jul 1, 2014 at 4:03 pm

Read our lips: NO NEW BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT!


Posted by Sense, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 2, 2014 at 10:37 am

Before you go tonight, come on over to the corner of Arastradero and El Camino (leave about 75% more travel time if you haven't been lately) and look at that monster hotel the Council approved. Where once there was single story business block, 3500 square feet, there now is a 22,000 square foot structure that is even out of character relative to Arbor Real, and towers over everything.

Do you want something 2.5 times bigger than THAT at 385 Sherman??

And as you are leaving, realize also that the proposed development at Maybell would have been more massive than that right in a residential neighborhood. And then remember, it is possible to stop this, hopefully before we are San Jose Mini-Me (with San Jose's corresponding property values). The developers are literally stealing our quality of life and property values for their own short-term gain. You can fight back.


Posted by palo alto resident, a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 2, 2014 at 10:45 am

Regarding the Sherman Ave expansion, it looks like the only issue is the request to eliminate the set back on Sherman Ave. Does the project fall under current zoning requirements otherwise?


Posted by Sense, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 2, 2014 at 11:37 pm


Quick question --

Why don't we charge a large, large fee to anyone who proposes any development outside of zoning rules? Everyone thinks they deserve an exception, when none of them do. We spend a lot of time dealing with these requests.

Why don't we just charge for it up front? Do we already do this? If so, I'd like to see that money committed to parkland and open space apportioned by where the zoning exceptions were granted.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,498 views

Why is doing nothing so difficult?
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 1,126 views

Breastfeeding Tips
By Jessica T | 6 comments | 1,050 views

Who Says Kids Donít Eat Vegetables?
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 855 views

Call it a novel: Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III
By Nick Taylor | 1 comment | 272 views