Town Square

Post a New Topic

City slammed for lack of transparency on Arrillaga proposals

Original post made on Jun 27, 2014

Palo Alto officials circumvented the public process and ignored the city's own policies about leasing of public land when they engaged in closed-door negotiations with billionaire developer John Arrillaga over a proposed office-and-theater complex at 27 University Ave. and a portion of parkland next to Foothills Park, the Santa Clara County Grand Jury found in a scathing new report.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, June 27, 2014, 12:00 AM

Comments (4)

Posted by Civitas, a resident of another community
on Jun 27, 2014 at 10:35 am

Considering the level of civic engagement in Palo Alto, the apparent attempt to fast-track the massive 27 University Avenue project in downtown Palo Alto was astonishingly ill-advised! Only some combination of hubris and stupidity could have possibly driven Palo Alto officials, including the former Deputy City Manager and several members of the City Council, to think that any attempt to slide a big new development project by a vigilant Palo Alto public would have had the slightest chance of success.


Posted by Sick, sick, sick, a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 28, 2014 at 2:20 pm

So sick of hearing about John Arrillaga and his sub-rosa activities. Sure, he has no ethics, what developer does? Just ignore hom( this includes the city council); maybe he will get the message and go away.


Posted by Ethics, what a concept, a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2014 at 3:40 pm

I haven't heard the word ethics in a long time. Someone, please send the definition to the City Manager. None of this could have happened without his approval.

Former Deputy City Manager Emslie is now working directly for developers - including
Facebook, The Sobrato Organization (owns Fry site), Uniqlo, Republic Services, Genentech, Audi USA, Grocery Outlet, Hearst Corp., CH2M Hill, Shell Oil, Zendesk, and AT&T


Posted by resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2014 at 8:23 pm



this same story has a different thread from June 20?

the title was "Palo Alto slammed for lack of transparency on Arrillaga proposals"

Web Link


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

How Bad Policy Happens
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 1,461 views

The life of Zarf
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 1,110 views

Freshman Blues Don't Mean Wrong College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 890 views

When Grandparents Visit
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 814 views

Background and Ideas for the Comp Plan
By Steve Levy | 14 comments | 814 views