Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 30, 2014
also, note that the Gunn Alumni Association is active and successful. there are still incidents at Gunn High School. it's a great school so treat it with great reverence. best of luck and don't deface or disgrace such a great school, please
Can you tell us what groups or individuals are being targeted by this hate conspiracy?
Asians were targeted as far as I know. [Portion removed.]
No generation if free from the children of Bigots. There are some Parents here that are just as guilty. Is it you?
Were these two students at Gunn?
I question the legitimacy of this story, by Chris Kenrick, and of the case itself.
I compared this to the version in the student newspaper, The Gunn Oracle, plus did a bit of legwork myself.
That one or more of our young people did a misdeed, there is little doubt, and they or their parents should be held accountable. I am questioning the characterization, by Perron, that this is a possible hate crime.
That, as reported in The Oracle, one of the messages started "Thank God..." makes me wonder if the utterance is a type of prayer, a religious utterance.
That it references the fact that Principal Katya Villalobos was re-assigned, from Gunn High to the Palo Alto Adult School, makes me think that the message in part was a political commentary.
That, as I confirmed walking the campus, the message was on the new Math Building, ironically labeled The N Building, -- and I have a strong suspicion that the alleged perpetrator was himself a person of color -- makes me wonder if this act, incomprehensible as it seems to many -- is a statement about Measure A the 2010 "Strong Schools" bond. Maybe this person wonders what part of the $14 million expenditure benefitted he or people like him, from his neighborhood, or with his interests. I too sometimes wonder about our expenditures.
I don't believe that being a member of a historically persecuted group would give one the right to, in turn, harm, harass or belittle others, or other persecuted groups, clearly. But I wonder why the Weekly plays up this angle, or what gives Perron the authority to characterize or judge the message or group of messages.
Also we have the unfortunate context that in 2008 people from certain parts of Palo Alto, near Gunn, and I am only guessing that the person here was from that neighborhood, families said that their sons were systematically harassed and profiled by the police here. This precipitated the replacement of Chief Lynne Johnson with Chief Dennis Burns. My understanding is that Dennis has done a good job, and there is less, maybe much less racial profiling - -of blacks and Latinos - -here.
But I've also seen photos or one photo of youngsters-- our youngsters, local kids -- on the front page of the local press, in handcuffs, if memory serves, and displayed as trophies with the tools of their allegedly illicit trade: spray cans, stickers, stencils. This is before trial, or before the right to defense. As in being tried in the press.
And also contextually to this Gunn "hate crime" incident we have a justice system that, especially in some parts of the U.S. does not guarantee Equal Protection, and that Gideon is not actually enforced, even 40 years later.
So I wonder if mitigating what this article or Officer Perron state about this case that some of what was done was a not-well-educated person doing a poor job of communicating ideas of political or religious nature, that are protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I'd like to know the exact content of these messages, and hear from the person what he was thinking.
And I'd like to know that he is able to mount a defense to charges that the State (which is still We the People) may bring.
And further, I am not sure I'd be so pleased with the cultural vigilante nature of the other math teachers releasing their students from the study of math per se to amend or destroy or react to what they saw, no matter if they found it offensive. Nor am I so proud of school administration asking parents to snitch on each other, as a means to hold someone accountable for the damages, via mass emails.
I think the Weekly could do a better job on this story and not arguably doing a disservice with shoddy reporting and fanning the flames of conflict.
What is done wrong by educated people, the powerful, or We The People -- in my name, in our name -- to me is a lot worse than what a young person, on his worst day, might do.
Unfortunately we are all aware what a young person on his worst day might do.
LITTLE green men, we should disinvite them.
Too obscure for me, Mark.
And for me as well.
Months later I have decided to close out this case rather than push for light to be shed and a remedy.
Another believable theory emerged that rather than a "hate crime" the vandal was, beyond being engaged in prayer and making protected political commentary, was also a whistle blower.
I'm gonna leave it at that. But I think The Weekly could do better. You should delete the comment speculating on what offensive words the writer had created, who as a group he or she might have been attacking.
Engagement Rings: Myths and Options
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 2,304 views
Opening alert: Go Fish Poke Bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,820 views
Talking about baby
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 942 views
Open Food Letter to Donald Trump
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 847 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2017 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.