Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 13, 2014
The Comp Plan should be a dynanmic document that is uppdated periodically but it makes sense to do that ONLY if it is going to be followed. Otherwise, the updating is just an expensive exercise. Further, I think I will never understand why a city our size has such a large staff (for a good comparison, check out the org chart for the Sacramento, a city that is about 7x larger than Palo Alto) yet we still need to employ consultants. If our staff is as capable as we are told and we have a good record of volunteerism by highly qualified and experienced residents willing to lend their expertise to various issues, it is questionable, to me, that major issues are delegated outward to consultants instead of internally to existing staff. If you know the answer, please share it. Thank you.
I agree with the above comment. Why does this plan need to be outsourced ? What do the City employees do. This appears to be a giant waste of our money.
City officials claim they want more input yet they continue to ignore the input here.
Maybe we should charge them a few hundred thousand dollars so they'll value our input.
If a project is outsourced to consultants and the public does not like it, staff can distance itself, blaming the outcome on someone else.
Only when a project is deemed good by the vocal few, will staff take credit, sometimes even taking all the credit, even if a project began through a collaboration of public/private efforts, and even if volunteers gave their time to make something happen.
Lots of money here, but too many people are short on memory.
The answer is pretty easy. No one in the city is willing nor capable to take responsibility. When things go wrong, it's a lot easier to blame the consultants. Sort of job security.
Why care when suckers like us pay their salaries? Some may ask what about honesty and integrity? My answer to that question is: wake up from your hibernation, honest people is a rare commodity nowadays.
Basic leadership/management training is that such a process needs to be open, fair and honest. Under the current leadership, the City has demonstrated that it is unwilling/incapable of providing such.
The indications are that this will be yet another instance of that problem. If this is not what the City leaders intend, they need to do something major to build the confidence of residents that this is not yet another rigged process.
This city has obviously learned nothing from the Great Recession. They still keep wasting money like it grows on trees.
While a. Of sultanate may sometimes be needed, there is no way that over half a million dollars should be spent on one.
$1,700,000 / 65,000 = $26 per man, woman, child that is a resident.
The problem is the consultant's work isn't monitored. It seems too many reports are thrown out. Maybe the city should hire a consultant to learn how to hire consultants?
Whether a consultant is hired or not, the city council and city planning staff should be held accountable for the cost and the results.
We don't need a long drawn out consultant project with endless meetings and feedback. The problems and the solutions are clear. We need a down zoning
of commercial floor area ratios, curtailment of exemptions and bonuses,
and enforcement of design review. The infrastructure constraints require it. Quality of life, character, aesthetic values, safety, which have all
been compromised and ignored will not take a back seat to the development
mania which has ruled this City. We need a new perspective, a new focus,
with a time sensitive sense of urgency and purpose.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,426 views
Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,617 views
Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,942 views
Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 1,382 views
It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 405 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.