Town Square

Post a New Topic

East Palo Alto fire station torn down

Original post made on Feb 28, 2014

Fire Station 2, Menlo Park Fire Protection District's busiest station, has been demolished in East Palo Alto and is expected to reopen as a 12,000-square-foot facility by the end of this year, Chief Harold Schapelhouman has announced.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 28, 2014, 9:53 AM

Comments (6)

Posted by Follow-up question, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Feb 28, 2014 at 10:58 am

I'm curious how they are housing and delivering the busy emergency services in that area during the construction period.


Posted by Safer I think, a resident of Midtown
on Feb 28, 2014 at 12:06 pm

I just feel good about the new safety for the people.


Posted by wondering, a resident of Downtown North
on Feb 28, 2014 at 1:33 pm

When Will That Financially Irresponsible City Build A Police Department?


Posted by Josh, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 28, 2014 at 10:20 pm

To wondering,

The fire station is in East PA, not Palo Alto.


Posted by Mr Fischer, a resident of Menlo Park
on Mar 2, 2014 at 1:24 am

Hello, My nieghbors ,...At ","wondering ,.You just keep,.."wondering",.. Kudos to our local fire district,..this is a great upgrade to our fire district . This is a great city lots of improvement has gradually taken place ,..and our city Council is doing a great job ,..SLOWLY BUT SHOWLY,..Its getting done ,..If you do not live here save your negative A** ,..post And just plain shut your trap its simple ,..I love E.P.A. Ca.,


Posted by Steven Kennedy, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Mar 28, 2014 at 6:33 am

I'm just wondering if the new Station II, located in the most densely populated area of the fire district, will be inundated by rising sea levels caused by global warming or if it will survive to the end of its service life, around the year 2084.

With that in mind, wouldn't it be a good idea to place solar PV panels on the roof of the new fire station from the get go?
My rule of thumb is, organizations that delay going solar, whether purchased or leased, will never catch up financially, to the early adopters of the technology.

With the new station costing $6 million, would it hurt to spend another $35,000 for solar PV (or lease it for 20 years for little or no upfront cost through a fixed, net lease that never goes up?)


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,497 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,780 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 967 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 866 views

SJSU Center for Steinbeck Studies to Honor Author Khaled Hosseini on Weds Sept 10
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 587 views