Town Square

Post a New Topic

In wake of recent crimes, Palo Alto police may consider public surveillance

Original post made on Feb 7, 2014

The Jan. 23 home-invasion robbery of an elderly Palo Alto couple was the flashpoint for a public meeting that focused on crime prevention and awareness at City Hall Tuesday night, police said.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 7, 2014, 12:00 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by oh my, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Feb 7, 2014 at 3:40 pm

Hopefully the Palo Alto Police Dept. will change their priority of chasing down teenage bicyclists running stop signs and focus instead on rising crime in our city. The Police Chief and City Manager seem to mistakenly believe that every crime can be somehow caught on video and therefore propose to gain public support in spending millions of tax dollars on installing surveillance cameras on light and power poles. How inane and simple minded. Perhaps the Police Chief and City Manager's time would be better spent on educating and training senior and middle management police officials on crime prevention techniques, restoring morale within police ranks, and remedying the exodus of our most qualified police officers.


Posted by CrescentParkAnon., a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 7, 2014 at 9:02 pm

> But the take-home message for residents Tuesday was to do everything they can to protect themselves

Uh, if people are armed and coming into our houses I think that is not a job for people protecting themselves, unless they have weapons and training to use them.

If some kind of surveillance is being thought about to combat this, explain what it is and how it works. For example posting cameras of every person who walks in or drives into the city that is kept for a limited amount of time, or unable to be accessed except by a court warrant in case of a crime would be OK with me. I don't see what kind of privacy invasion that would be ... am I missing something?


Posted by Diff'rent Strokes, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Feb 9, 2014 at 6:30 pm

When we lived in South Palo Alto, we had a neighborhood watch. This included monthly meetings at a different person's home, complete with a potluck dinner.

Now that we live north of Oregon, neighbors apparently feel safe from crime, because absolutely no one we have discussed this with wants anything to do with a neighborhood watch ( claiming it is unneeded, everyone works too late, too busy, too tired, too many kids, &c). About one-third have never even heard of a neighborhood watch and would not want to be involved anyway, because they feel this is the job of the police.

If people do not feel that crime prevention begins at home, and that no one is immune to crime, what can a community do? Apparently in some European countries this is entirely the domain of the government!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Palo Alto quietly gets new evening food truck market
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,550 views

See Me. Hear Me. Donít Fix Me.
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,765 views

Foothills Park: a world away
By Sally Torbey | 11 comments | 1,584 views

Universal Language
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,364 views

Candidate Kickoff Events: Public, not just for supporters
By Douglas Moran | 7 comments | 936 views