Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Dec 20, 2013
Surprise, surprise, the NIMBYs who claimed they were in favor of senior housing are going to get market rate housing with FAR higher traffic, school, and other impacts than the project they shot down in such ignorance.
Why, oh why, did so many voters fall for such uninformed nonsense propagated by the opponents of the Maybell project? Maybe because local news reporters don't actually do any investigations anymore, just chase headlines?
Through the campaign, I did not see an explanation as to why that site is a good one for seniors.
Now that there is perhaps less pressure to communicate campaign messages with every utterance, can someone describe this?
(I'm not asking if the city needs more senior or low cost housing, just why this is the right spot or a good spot specifically for seniors).
I ask because I do understand why it would be a good spot for families with school-age children.
@Maybell Critics -- Uh, there is plenty of low income housing here already. So the NIMBY label doesn't stick. Residents have even asked the city council and staff to try to save the low income housing that is already here and prevent these units from converting to market rates.
Furthermore, the Maybell site is not a good site for seniors. But then we are just rehashing the same issues which the election settled, like it or not.
And it still doesn't make sense to claim that by upzoning the site there will be less density! That didn't fly either and still doesn't make sense!
Neighbors welcome that the site be developed under existing zoning. What a concept!
I support reprogramming the $5.8 million City loan on the Maybell property to help the residents of the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park to purchase the property and become homeowners in the City we all love. This would show a good faith effort to preserve and maintain the current level of low income housing stock, by saving the largest low income housing project in the City.
My second choice would be housing for families with disabled children.
I supported Measure D, but that's neither here nor there at this point. The voters have spoken: undo the rezoning for the affordable housing project. And so has the city council : the city will not assume an ownership stake in the property and PAHC is free to sell the property, pay off its debts and move on.
As for what happens next, I have my druthers, but the market will determine what goes in there. Competing real estate developers will calculate how to make the most off this valuable property and bid accordingly.
I'm interested but not overly anxious. I do believe there will be more impact on traffic and the schools than under PAHC's proposal, but the "nightmare scenarios" are just that. No one is going to build something truly awful at the Maybell/Clemo site. There's lots of money to be made there in residential real estate priced to the market. Why mess it up?
I can't imagine a developer wasting this opportunity to build high-end housing, whether condos, townhouses or single family homes. Unless, of course, a particular vision of what could be done with the property, like establish a community orchard, inspires one to outbid the field.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,230 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,228 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,563 views
"the Summit" (CompPlan): Forewarned is Forearmed
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 819 views
A quiet moment
By Sally Torbey | 8 comments | 631 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.