Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto pulls the plug on proposed billboard

Original post made on Oct 29, 2013

After flickering for just long enough to enrage the public, Palo Alto's plan to install a digital billboard along U.S. Highway 101 quickly fizzled on Monday night.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, October 29, 2013, 2:04 AM

Comments (12)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 29, 2013 at 7:43 am

The billboard would not be consistent with community values, the Mayor
said. He agreed with residents who called it garish, tacky, anti-environment. Now since we established community values and aesthetics
as important, a major step forward, let's apply this to everything else
the City is doing.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Seriously?
a resident of University South
on Oct 29, 2013 at 9:08 am

Wow, Scharff is now concerned with what the community values. Where was his concern when he approved the three PC projects and all the high density office buildings that required rezoning? They violated the Comprehensive Plan which expresses our land use values, so he just amended the Plan. It's legal and his friends and clients made millions at the expense of the residents who suffer the consequences of increased traffic, parking shortages, school overcrowding, limited infrastructure capacities, etc.

I guess Scharff could vote against a billboard because none of his buddies would be making millions of dollars from building it.

Does Scharff really think we believe that he is concerned about community values?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elizabeth
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 29, 2013 at 10:19 am

A glimmer of intelligence from the City!

Now if they can just reprogram those horrible speed signs on Alma so they only start blinking if someone is actually exceeding the speed limit.

Distractingly dangerous and incredibly annoying. Don't nag me if I'm driving several miles below the speed limit to tell me I need to slow down.

We're out in the streets to live life and it feels like we've been dragged back to the virtual world.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kate
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 29, 2013 at 10:28 am

Be careful what you propose, vote for........ There's an election in the future - and this town's collective civic memory is getting shorter and shorter ----tinged with rage. Reminds me of children being "good" six months before Christmas.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Anymouse
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 29, 2013 at 11:38 am

I agree with all above comments, I do believe the City Council is aware that most Palo Altans are of the opinion of poster 'Seriously?"

@Kate, reminds me of house cleaners suddenly cleaning properly a month before Christmas.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 29, 2013 at 12:27 pm

Every day I see another street sign. We are undergoing massive sign proliferation. They are taking over the City. Gratuitous signs, redundant signs,sign clutter just reduces the effectiveness of those signs which are actually needed. We will end up in the Guinness Record Book - small city category - the most signs/linear foot of street.




 +   Like this comment
Posted by Consider the Cost
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Oct 29, 2013 at 1:21 pm

Did the council finally find out the true cost of these billboards?? Apparently, it is $200,000+! And advertising income from it isNOT a sure thing!

That money is needed elsewhere, and spending priorities need to be set first.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by JerryL
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Oct 29, 2013 at 1:25 pm

Sorry not to go along. But I remember when that area had the drive-in
movie screens. I didn't see a problem then and I am not sure I see a problem
now.

In the same general area, we put up huge sound walls, which have to be blocking many folks view of the freeway and distant bay lands. Somehow, that's not a problem. But this money producer apparently would be.

That reminds me of some recent criticisms of cell phone projects. One of the criticisms were that the hosting organization was going to be (ugh) paid for letting a piece of their property be used. As if receiving rent were somehow bad.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Nmc
a resident of Green Acres
on Oct 29, 2013 at 11:13 pm

If this council had not allowed a developer to get away with what was done at Miki's market, we would be getting retail revenue taxes from the revitalized businesses there now, instead of a daily unpleasant reminder of the new Palo Alto values of ugly and dense.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 30, 2013 at 7:51 am

I don't understand what the problem is.

A Vegas-style flashing billboard seems completely consistent with the current Staff and Council's own "stealth Comprehensive Plan" for Palo Alto.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park
on Oct 30, 2013 at 10:35 am

I agree with Elizabeth about the blinking yellow signs on Alma. If I speed up, will they stop? They are annoyingly & possibly dangerously distracting. At 29 mph in a 35 mph zone, northbound in moderate traffic last Sunday afternnon, they were a distraction no drivers needed. Instead of focussing on traffic & cars entering from the right, bright yellow blinking lights pull drivers' attention away from the road.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 30, 2013 at 11:33 am

I am concerned that a lengthy article concerning this topic appeared in the San Jose Mercury News today 10/30/13. It gives the impression that "staff" is investing time, money, and publication in local papers the investigation of these schemes before they are discussed within the overall budget for the city. It is like gaming the system and forcing people's hand in the public. That is totally unnecessary.
Can the city please provide a comprehensive plan and budget for the city review and comment prior to green-lighting the time and expense to take positions on controversial ventures and then forcing the CC to arbitrate the outcome with the public. That calls into question what else the "staff" has on their list of "ideas". It calls into question if the tail is wagging the dog or the dog is wagging the tail.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Sneak peek: Bradley's Fine Diner in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,468 views

Marriage Underachievers
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,697 views

Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,625 views

Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,375 views

It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 883 views