Town Square

Post a New Topic

Ronald McDonald House expansion clears final hurdle

Original post made on Jun 4, 2013

The Ronald McDonald House, which offers shelter to families of children with life-threatening illnesses, will roughly double in size and add 69 rooms under an expansion plan the Palo Alto City Council enthusiastically approved Monday night.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, June 4, 2013, 1:36 AM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by surfin' usa
a resident of Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Jun 4, 2013 at 2:00 pm

never trust an authority. not even yourself.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not an issue
a resident of Community Center
on Jun 4, 2013 at 3:52 pm

Nice that council okayed tthis without their usual shenaningans.
However if you read the story it may cast a light on why council meetings drag on. You will notice that each council member has to weigh in with their self- congratulatory opinions. Why do they do this? Clearly it will be in the minutes of the meeting, but who reads that?
No, the council knows that a reporter from the personal newspaper of the council will be " reporting" on this and the story will almost certainly contain a portion of their " words of wisdom". Why nt have the reporter just report on the actual story and not include the quotations-- maybe then the council will not waste time pontificating and maybe meetings will end at a normal hour ( and wasn't the a push recently to scale back on length of meetings?-- weekly how about a follow up on that) .

 +   Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jun 4, 2013 at 4:52 pm

If average stay gets to 30 days, does this count toward our ABAG quota?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by neighbor
a resident of another community
on Jun 4, 2013 at 6:07 pm

Musical -- are you serious?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jun 5, 2013 at 10:10 am

Like Kniss said, only the Grinch would be against this. I've known people who've used this facility and I have donated towards it. But development around here has turned into a vicious spiral. My curiosity was piqued by the final paragraph saying the average stay has climbed 500%. Beyond 30 days is no longer "transient occupancy" and if we're mandated 2000 more housing units, we should claim every credit legally conceivable. Though I often fail, I try to keep my comments from being entirely facetious.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Continuation of Office Cap Discussion
By Steve Levy | 9 comments | 2,661 views

By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,933 views

"Itís Not About the Nail"
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 1,329 views

Ramen shop replaces Muracciís in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 1,326 views

Mismanagement of Consultants
By Douglas Moran | 7 comments | 1,085 views