Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto urged not to fund a Catholic nonprofit

Original post made on Apr 18, 2013

With Catholic Charities facing allegations of discrimination from gay-rights advocates in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, D.C., Palo Alto officials found themselves debating on Tuesday night whether the organization's local chapter should continue to draw grant funding from the city.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 11:57 PM

Comments (16)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by local gurl
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Apr 18, 2013 at 10:05 am

That's right, those of you who oppose Catholic Charities. Let's take away services from our most vulnerable citizens for the sake of P.C. politics. YOU get out there and serve those seniors, and maybe we'll take your demands into account.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Garden Gnome
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 18, 2013 at 10:27 am

You go, local gurl!

Agreed - let's hurt senior citizens just because the Catholic church doesn't support gay marriage/adoptions.

By the way, whatever happened to freedom of religion?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 18, 2013 at 10:33 am

I hope those who think this is a good idea never need the services of this charity themselves or for someone near and dear to them.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by KP
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 10:54 am

Whatever the church believes is irrelevant to the fact that they help anyone who needs it. If you don't tell what goes on in your bedroom, they won't know, duh!
You don't cut off support for your own personal feelings, point blank, period!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tip of the iceberg
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 18, 2013 at 10:55 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 18, 2013 at 12:13 pm

If you look hard enough, you'll (or someone else with a differing view point) will find something wrong with any organization out there.

Newsflash: No one is perfect.

Cutting off the seniors doesn't seem to be a wise move. How about this - take your personal concerns to the organization yourself - have a little sit-down and get it off your chest directly.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Silly
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Apr 18, 2013 at 12:52 pm

WHY was the city -- which is supposed to be broke -- funding them at all? Churches already get $71 BILLION a year in tax exemptions and then [portion removed] lobby against the rights of women and gays.

Why do they need mor3e from us???


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gethin
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 1:40 pm

This has nothing to do with freedom of religion, this a question of why should Palo Alto taxpayers fund a program run by one of the wealthiest religious organizations in the country when we have financial problems of our own.
This should be funded by the church and any interested citizens or companies. It should not be funded by taxpayers.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 1:55 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:04 pm

Gethin is correct, why should we be funding one of the richest organizations in the world

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Palo Alto should not be financially supporting a rich organization--their discriminatory practices are just another reason to deny them money


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:13 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by The Terror of the Gay Mafia
a resident of Ohlone School
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:19 pm

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

back to topic: get govt out of my religion, and religion outta my govt.

Cath Char and the churches can start paying property taxes if they want govt help.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:29 pm

Sam--the city should not fund the richest organization in the world--the fact that they discriminate against women and gays is just icing on the cake.

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

The catholic church and the boy scouts happen to practice discrimination--they are not being attacked--their practices are being questioned--as allowed in our country.
But feel free to "fight back"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tip of the iceberg
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:32 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Carl
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:50 pm

Beyond the Cath. Charities thing, what puzzles me is how Palo Alto gets $500,000 from HUD (that is, the feds) to spend locally for charity work, when the feds are deep into deficit spending. Same old, same old, right? Then multiply that $500,000 by all the cities of PA's size and larger across this great land, and you've got serious money (from China?).


 +   Like this comment
Posted by local gurl
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:50 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please click here to Log in

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,764 views

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 33 comments | 1,979 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,901 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,023 views

Mothers, daughters, books, and boxes
By Sally Torbey | 4 comments | 862 views