Town Square

Post a New Topic

Proposed downtown 'gateway' building debated

Original post made on Jun 30, 2011

Palo Alto officials would like to see larger developments near the city's transit stations, but they are still trying to hash out exactly who should occupy these buildings. The issue emerged Wednesday night, when the Planning and Transportation Commission discussed a proposed four-story "gateway" building at the intersection of Alma Street and Lytton Avenue.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 10:53 PM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not in the public interest
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 30, 2011 at 11:23 am

"Vice Chair Lee Lippert was the most enthusiastic". No surprises there. Architect Lippert is a long standing advocate of more development.
Tuma's "Golden opportunity" to break the 50 foot height limit is a golden opportunity to make money for developers, not a golden opportunity for the people who live here and for whom quality of life is important.
The commission is dominated by people who make money off of land development.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gethin
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:13 pm

What's wrong with people making money off land development as long as it follows guidelines?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not in the public interest
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 30, 2011 at 2:31 pm

There is a lot wrong when a government official advocates policies that will benefit himself. There are lots of ways to describe it, like self-dealing, conflict of interest, etc.
For example, when such a person advocates changing the 50 foot height limit that will benefit his friends and indirectly therefore himself, that is wrong and immoral. The majority of the Planning Commissioners work for developers and advocate for their interests. That is wrong. Or they are involved in trading which benefits from greater density. Ethical government officials should not do that.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gethin
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 30, 2011 at 3:09 pm

As I said, "as long as it follows guidelines."
Your point seems to be that the officials responsible for this development are entirely corrupt. An entirely different issue and so I amend my comments to be that I see no reason for developers not to benefit from their developments. I see every reason for our officials to benefit from them


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not in the public interest
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 30, 2011 at 7:12 pm

"As long as it follows guidelines," I agree. Of course making money while obeying the law is fine. Did you really think I oppose that?
I cannot recall a recent project that didn't break the rules (not guidelines, zoning laws) and ask for a zoning change like this one or an exception for height, for reduced setbacks from the street or from the neighbors, a zoning variance, increased density, you name it, they study the code and look for ways to push, push as much as possible.
Jim Baer is an expert at this game, that's why they all hire him. He knows how to manipulate the system better than anyone.
They whitewash by offering a couple of below market rate apartments and green wash it with an electric charging station. Street trees and fixed sidewalks around the project are not public benefits, they are benefits to the project.The city pretends it doesn't know that.
There is unquestionably corruption involved, its just hard to pinpoint. But if the Planning Department said no, these abuses wouldn't happen. And the city council of course, never says no.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Easy Living
By Sally Torbey | 11 comments | 2,375 views

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 10 comments | 2,261 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,402 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 794 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 1 comment | 497 views