Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto Animal Services holding fundraiser

Original post made on Mar 18, 2011

Palo Alto Animal Services will hold a fundraiser Saturday (March 19) from 1 to 4 p.m. at its headquarters at 3281 East Bayshore Road in Palo Alto.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 18, 2011, 2:00 PM

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 18, 2011 at 3:25 pm

> Funds raised will go toward covering the costs of spaying and
> neutering cats and dogs

There is no reason that this City-run operation should not operate on a "cost-neutral" basis. That is to say, charge the people who want these sorts of services the cost of those services. This is not rocket-science, it's basic business.

Moreover, it's really not clear why the City is running this service--since it can clearly be performed equally well (if not better) in the private sector.

Time for Palo Alto local government to stop offering this sort of service.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Shannon
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Mar 18, 2011 at 3:28 pm

Keep in mind they spay and neuter all animals that come in to be adopted. Who pays for those surgeries, when there is no owner??


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Mar 18, 2011 at 4:31 pm

Keeping the cost down also means that people are more likely to get their pet altered, thus keeping overpopulation down to a duller roar. Additionally, many people involved in animal rescue use low cost spay/neuter clinics to alter the animals that they rescue as well as many feral cats. Since they either rely on donations or pay out of pocket, having low cost services such as these are crucial for the animal welfare field - & the public at large. We are very, very lucky that this org & PHS do such a good job.

I wish this was posted earlier because many people won't be able to make it last minute. I hope it's a success nevertheless.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 18, 2011 at 7:18 pm

> Keep in mind they spay and neuter all animals that come in
> to be adopted.

> Who pays for those surgeries, when there is no owner??

The parties doing the adopting. This argument that the taxpayers have an obligation to cleanup after pet owners is getting to be so very tiring. There are a never-ending stream of people with their tin cups out .. looking for other people to pay their bills. Pet owners are just another special interest group that needs to start acting adult, and paying their own bills.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Nora Charles
a resident of Stanford
on Mar 18, 2011 at 11:32 pm

Hmmm,

Well said. And I wish I'd known about this sooner--let's hope it was widely publicized. May many pets find wonderful new homes!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Mar 19, 2011 at 9:13 pm

Joe, the pet owners do pay for the altering, retroactively, in the adoption fee. The cool thing also is when people get a pet another way & bring it there to be altered - I've used them for dogs I've fostered AND donated $$ to them, while paying out of pocket for that stray I picked up.

Of course tax dollars should in part pay for these things because humans have domesticated the animals & we're responsible for them. It's very difficult & frustrating to deal w/ignorant and/or stupid people who aren't responsible about their pets or allow pet overpopulation to get out of hand in their neighborhood. I do a lot of education in this area & have to take breaks because I get burnt out.

Pet owners don't have their tin cups out; we're taxpayers like everyone else. We can all kvetch & complain about our tax dollars going to things we don't personally/individually believe in, so I get your complaints, but that doesn't change the need, or the system. Things aren't evenly distributed on the screwed up end of things, creating that need. For example, you might have someone who moves & let's their cat go stray instead of taking it w/them & it has kittens who are feral, etc. But there are many, many responsible pet owners who contribute to the overall economy vis a vis vet visits, pet food, petsitters, groomers AND pay taxes. There are people who do all of that AND are involved in animal rescue work for which they don't receive a dime (such as moi) but it's walking their/my talk.

The bottom line: most pet owners pay their bills & the bills of others via their tax dollars & donations; it doesn't take many irresponsible pet owners to throw things off track due to how quickly & prolifically our pets breed. Sheesh, it's incredible, from cats to rats, from dogs to frogs, from guinea pigs to the pot bellied variety - populations can spiral out of control very quickly.

Most shelters do fundraisers & receive donations in addition to receiving some tax dollars AND when they also have an animal control contract. Part of it is being humane, but a big part of it is also public safety & vector control.

I really like PA Animal Services.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Mixx, Scott's Seafood replacement, opens in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 9 comments | 2,929 views

Ten Steps to Get Started with Financial Aid
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,900 views

All Parking Permits Should Have a Fee
By Steve Levy | 23 comments | 1,615 views

To Cambodia With Love
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,354 views

Early Campaign Notes: City Council
By Douglas Moran | 3 comments | 196 views