Town Square

Post a New Topic

Report: Palo Alto officer taped, released private info

Original post made on Oct 20, 2010

A Palo Alto police officer who secretly recorded a phone conversation between an East Palo Alto tenant activist and an official from Page Mill Properties in December 2008 and then released the transcript to Page Mill violated a department policy, a recently completed internal investigation found.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 8:45 AM

Comments (28)

Posted by Wants-To-Know, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2010 at 9:01 am

> A Palo Alto police officer who secretly recorded a phone
> conversation between an East Palo Alto tenant activist and an
> official from Page Mill Properties in December 2008

While this article focuses on releasing the transcript of this conversation--shouldn't someone be asking how the Officer came to be recording conversations between EPA "activists" and PMP officials? Was this recording under authority of a warrant? Was it an illegal recording? Was a "bug" involved? Just how did the recording come to be, in the first place. Why was the Palo Alto police involved in this in the first place? How many other conversations does the Palo Alto Police Department have on file between various members of the community. Does the Palo Alto Police routine record telephone conversations of other people too?

Too many unanswered questions. Another of the less-than-stellar reporting efforts of the Weekly.


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 20, 2010 at 10:36 am

Many of us, in addition to Dr. Lund, have been waiting for this investigation to be completed. It's a shame that more punishment wasn't leveled at the officers involved. Once again, Page Mill has caused honest taxpayers a waste of money. If Page Mill hadn't been so crooked, this wouldn't have happened. I'm very glad to read that Dr. Lund has forwarded the findings to an attorney. EPA renters have been incredibly fortunate to have Dr. Lund among the many activists, but he has been among the bravest to shine light on Page Mill's nasty deeds.


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 20, 2010 at 10:47 am

@Wants-To-Know - I think this pretext phone call was due to spurious allegations against Dr. Lund that he was trying to extort 20k out of Page Mill. Perhaps, since Lt. Morgan worked for Page Mill, Morgan and Page Mill cooked up the scheme and that false accusation was all that was needed for the pretext call. I wonder how many man hours were involved, overall, in the whole case, and what it cost you good citizens of Palo Alto? Your city, like most, is facing serious budget issues and a waste of money such as was likely involved to investigate this "matter" could've been put to better use. Perhaps residents can request an accounting of the time and cost of this wrongful investigation.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2010 at 10:48 am

The Police Officer was moonlighting for another organization, and was not on duty for the City of PA at the time. He has long ago left the PAPD.


Posted by Shocked!, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 20, 2010 at 11:10 am

Violated a 'department policy'? How about, the LAW.


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 20, 2010 at 11:10 am

@Resident - so what's your point? Others involved in the pretext phone call and leaking information to Page Mill Properties still work for PAPD. Being dismissive of such questionable behavior doesn't serve anyone or any decent means.


Posted by Corey Levens, a resident of Green Acres
on Oct 20, 2010 at 11:37 am

Wants-to-Know has raised the core issue here: Why was this call recorded? Under California law, it is illegal to record a conversation without the consent of the party being recorded. Unless there was a warrant issued in this case, it would appear laws were broken.


Posted by Timothy Gray, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 20, 2010 at 11:43 am

This is not the first time April Wagner's name has been brought up in the context of bad behaviour. Until we have a Independent Police Review that provides independent oversight, this will continue to happen. The current police auditor acts in an important role for taxpayers as a liability mitigation specialist, but by no means plays the role of police auditor.

Let's get some transparency going for our stellar police department. A couple bad apples keep giving Palo Alto a black eye.

Respectfully,

Tim Gray


Posted by Don, a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 20, 2010 at 12:04 pm

Typical irresponsible smearing by Mr. Gray. He takes one incident and uses a broad brush to imply there is more to be found. Facts please, Mr. Gray.


Posted by Shameer, a resident of Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Oct 20, 2010 at 12:13 pm

...and then promoted to Sgt. That's our PAPD. If you are in the right "circle" then the rules don't matter.


Posted by Wants-To-Know, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2010 at 12:46 pm

Ok .. from putting together some of the comments, it seems that:

1) an off-duty PA police officer, working for PMP, recorded a phone conversation, presumably with the permission of at least one PMP official. The use, and distribution, of this recording is unknown, at the moment.

2) A subsequent investigation into the police officer's behavior, reveals to the PA investigator the existence of this recording.

3) For some reason, the PA PD comes into possession of the recording.

4) At a latter time, an office in the PAPD releases this recording to parties unnamed, for reasons unknown. (Note--this many unknowns leaves a lot of room for the hint of money passing hands to fill some of the gaps.)

5) At even a later time, someone (presumably the officer investigating the original officer's activities) learns that the conversation (one of many??) has been improperly (but not illegally?) released to parties unknown.

Wow! What a tangled mess. If the conversation were of no particular interest--this becomes even a bigger waste of time. If there were possibly incriminating evidence on the recording, this opens another can of works.

It would be interesting to see if document/recording/etc. that is considered as "confidential" is actually stamped, or otherwise tagged, so that people who pick up a file folder know what the securing classification of the folder, and its documents, might be?


Posted by Gennady Sheyner, Palo Alto Weekly staff writer
on Oct 20, 2010 at 1:13 pm

Gennady Sheyner is a registered user.

Wants-to-Know,

I updated the story to address some of your questions.

Gennady


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 20, 2010 at 1:45 pm

MS. Sheyner, thank you for updating the story, which clarifies the happenings a bit. Clearly, pretext phone calls are legal. But why the heck would PAPD release the the taped call to Page Mill for any kind of facilitation? Facilitating what? More investigation, which is the job of PAPD? This whole thing stinks to high heaven, giving the strong impression that Page Mill received very, very special treatment by PAPD due to their employment of both Morgan and Shore. is it legal to allow a private company to "facilitate" part of a police investigation? Was it legal to release the tape? Was it legal for Page Mill to leak it to the press?

I hope that Lund's attorneys take action on this if it's actionable.


Posted by who cares, a resident of Triple El
on Oct 20, 2010 at 2:13 pm

Another day-another city department scandel in Palo Alto. Meanwhile city manager Keene is unavailable (again), city attorney Baum won't answer calls, mayor Burt doesn't return e-mails or phone calls. Maybe that's part of the problem, nobody wants to be in charge of a dysfunctional mess.


Posted by Larry S, a resident of Palo Alto Orchards
on Oct 20, 2010 at 2:38 pm

PAPD doesn't come out smelling very good in this affair. First, they have no reason releasing a police dept transcript to one of the involved parties for any reason whatever. Second, the police officer who violated dept policy (and the law?) gets counseling - and a big promotion. (Which sends the bigger message?) The most sinister aspect seems to be the police lieutenant working for Page Mill Properties. Moonlighting in a case like this was clearly inappropriate, but going over to a complainants home and taking pictures is far more than moonlighting - that's intimidation and a violation of privacy! Was this officer ever disciplined before retiring? Should have been!
The fact that a lieutentant - who supposedly knows the rules! - would do such actions on behalf of one of the largest landlords in the area seems to indicate some kind of understanding or collusion on the part of the police department or at least a lack of oversight and training at its highest levels. I like to be a supporter of the police, I really do, but it is for them to be worthy of our support, to be above suspicion. They are certainly not so in this case.


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 20, 2010 at 3:52 pm

@Larry S., thank you for your salient points. Personnel laws prohibit some of the important info being revealed. Those of us on this side of the creek that went to community meetings recall Morgan accompanying Page Mill executives a la bodyguarding, after he'd told the police chief his job was as consultant for emergency preparedness or something like that. The security patrol reported to Morgan and he was their de facto boss. Even though he's now gone from PAPD, the stink remains - and is increased by the actions of the other officers cooperating, perhaps even unknowingly, in this nasty series of events.


Posted by PAPD-Critic, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 20, 2010 at 6:38 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Koa, a resident of Mountain View
on Oct 20, 2010 at 8:09 pm

It sounds to me like Page Mill and their hired Palo Alto cops were conspiring to entrap Lund.


Posted by Adam, a resident of South of Midtown
on Oct 20, 2010 at 8:30 pm

More corruption stories about Palo Alto police and prosecutors. Aren't they ashamed of their deeds? Those are supposedly the ones who bring justice to the nation they supposedly protect, and every day we read a different story about the violation of citizens and their rights. Men of law enforcement of Santa Clara, you bring shame to our society here in Palo Alto, and to the general American nation. We are embarrassed with you.


Posted by Zee, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 21, 2010 at 6:34 am

"Wagner has since been promoted to sergeant."


This speaks volume of how the incompetent and corrupt end up being in charge of our lives. Law enforcement officials (some of them not all) make sure they get everything they think they deserve, but try as an ordinary citizen and make a simple mistake like asking, "Sir, why am I being arrested?" and get your arse thrown in jail for resisting arrest.


Posted by Zee, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 21, 2010 at 6:37 am

By the way, great story Gennady. It is time one of you Palo Alto journalists did the right thing and reported a story without bias. WTG.

Make sure you get to the bottom of every story if you want to be taken seriously. Expect resistance and hatered and don't be afraid to speak the truth.

Thank you again.


Posted by Hmmm, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 21, 2010 at 10:08 am

Koa - I bet you're right. If they could entrap him, that justice oriented thorn would be out of their side. Instead, he complained about his treatment, went public at a city council meeting and continued to expose Page Mills' awful behavior towards tenants, investors and taxpayers. Dr. Lund has a lot of integrity and kept it intact although he'd made a powerful enemy and had a lot at risk.


Posted by Bob O'Connor, a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Oct 21, 2010 at 10:43 am

The officer broke the law! he should be prosecuted to the full extent and fired! Does the local DA have any balls?


Posted by Timothy Gray, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 21, 2010 at 11:33 am

Web Link

To discuss the actions of police is in no way to disrespect and not appreciate the great and noble efforts of law enforcement.

Civil discourse requires openess. This means community discussion without name-calling.

The above link is one more story about a public servant that strayed. Only in this case, accountability was applied. While we lack the details that would surface in due process, so we don't know the whole story -- there seems to be a departure from the accountability most taxpayers expect from their City. Bad behaviour cannot hide behind the shield of respect we offer to Law Enforcement.

Respectfully,

Tim Gray


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 21, 2010 at 12:32 pm

Oh-My-Dog. This transcript is a must read. A total set-up.


Posted by Koa, a resident of Mountain View
on Oct 22, 2010 at 7:18 pm

I read the full transcript. Very troubling indeed. Lund was running out of ways to say no to Russel's repeated attempts to bribe him.


Posted by Finally!, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 23, 2010 at 1:41 pm

Pretext phone calls are a great way to catch a criminal. They're also, apparently, a good way to trip yourself up when you're the lying criminal who's pretending to be innocent. Heads need to roll. What will happen to Jim Shore, former prosecutor and Page Mill's hired gun? Was Wagner's part innocent? Was she duped, or was she a participant in this crookedness? Some residents are complaining about the OT paid to PA officers during Obama's recent visit. How come no one's complaining about all the monies spent on Page Mill's FALSE complaint against Dr. Lund, and the necessary investigation following?? Let's see, so far, we know that there was:

-An investigation into Dr. Lund, incl the pretext phone call

-The investigation following Dr. Lund's complaints about this call and the leaked tape, which involve multiple police personnel (was anything ever sent to the DA to review?)

-Any resulting discipline costs to officers involved

What will the future of this crookedness bring, and what will be the cost to residents? Was there a coverup? Is there now a partial coverup?


Posted by Zee, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 24, 2010 at 7:11 pm

The local DA (dolores) has no balls, unless there is something we don't know about.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Gourmet hot dogs, sausage food truck coming to the Peninsula
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 2,704 views

Allowing Unauthorized Immigrants to Learn and Earn Legally Will Help the Economy
By Steve Levy | 31 comments | 2,136 views

College applications: round three
By Sally Torbey | 24 comments | 1,599 views

Is HBO's Silicon Valley Any Good?
By Anita Felicelli | 14 comments | 1,553 views

PAUSD Leadership Challenges
By Paul Losch | 14 comments | 1,097 views