In Proposition 22, a Cautionary Tale of Piecemeal Reform
Original post made by Resident, Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Oct 19, 2010
Proposition 22 would close this loophole, prohibiting the state from taking further redevelopment tax increment. It would also amend Proposition 1A, no longer allowing the state to borrow local property taxes at times of fiscal distress.
What Proposition 22 does not do, however, is say how the state legislature is supposed to balance the state budget, provide funding for all of the important programs the state pays for, and also give voters the kind of schools they want. In short, while local governments may win, someone else is going to have to lose. State lawmakers will certainly find some other loophole or some other revenue source not covered by Proposition 22 -- because the alternative, cutting basic public services, is both unattractive and highly unpopular among voters. [Act V]
So, no matter what happens this November, stay tuned for Act VI.
Employees-turned-owners revamp Cafe Alto, open new restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 3,822 views
Reducing Congestion and Parking Challenges While Respecting the Mobility Advantages of Cars
By Steve Levy | 13 comments | 2,132 views
Council Priorities 2015: Honesty, Focus, and Listening about Listening
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,336 views