Town Square

Post a New Topic

Internet and TV/Cable Service issues?

Original post made by Al Henning, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Jun 7, 2010

I have been trying to upgrade my AT&T DSL internet service, without success.

This story contains 205 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 7, 2010 at 5:34 pm

If you're located in the Duveneck/St. Francis area, I'm not sure how you were quoted a distance 19,000 ft. You may want to try contacting an alternative DSL provider such as Sonic.net and see what they can offer.

Comcast Teleworker might be another option, assuming you're associated with a company that has an arrangement with Comcast. Teleworker is business class service (unlimited) for about $39/month, modem included.


Like this comment
Posted by Comcast Is A Naughty Word
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 7, 2010 at 6:26 pm

My suggestion: Unless under pain of death, do NOT sign up with Comcast for anything. You WILL regret it, typically sooner than later.

Not sure what's happening with your DSL. Sounds fishy to me that ATT says you're too far away to get high speeds, then turns around and says, sure you can have it but only if you bundle it with UVerse. I'd call and threaten to cut the service unless you're given an acceptable choice.


Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 7, 2010 at 6:47 pm

We've been mostly happy with how Comcast works, but the prices are insane, even for the bundled services.

With no competition, they just gouge you.


Like this comment
Posted by covad?
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 7, 2010 at 7:48 pm

I've been using Covad.net for many years. I pay $25/month for a very reliable 1500 kbps DSL download speed. Don't remember how much the setup fee was. AT&T sucks.


Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 8, 2010 at 10:13 pm

For TV, consider over-the-air (ATSC). You get the three major networks, indepedents, and 5 digital PBS stations with about 12-14 channels among them. No ESPN-- a problem for sports fans, but otherwise, I like it better than cable. And, it is free.

AS for DSL -- DSL technology really does have problems over distance, but, it sounds like you should still be getting better than you are.


Like this comment
Posted by Al Henning
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 9, 2010 at 12:30 pm

Thanks to all for the feedback.

AT&T ran a diagnostic test (time domain reflectometry), and our distance from the hub is over 19,000 ft. AT&T sold this to us in the earliest days of DSL, before the technical issues of speed over distance were fully appreciated. Today, they would not sell us DSL, if we were a new customer.

The distance to the hub from one house to the next can vary dramatically, by over 10,000 ft. There is no rationality to how the lines are run: clearly some sort of legacy problem with the wiring. A neighbor with two lines reported that one line was over 15,000 ft, the other under 5,000 ft.

Resolution: 1) AT&T has been sued for underdelivery of DSL performance. There's some sort of class action, and we may get a small amount of money back via that route. 2) I have signed up for UVerse Pro Internet. AT&T finally said I did not also have to sign up for TV, but that the installation fee ($149) would not then be waived. Cost is $35/mo, plus $3/mo eqpt lease, compared to the $25/mo I now pay (and my DSL hasn't worked at all the last two days). I pushed hard on the $149 installation charge; they refused to waive, but gave a rebate of $60 on the old DSL service, in recognition of poor performance over the last year, documented by my technical service calls.

With only one or two exceptions, I've heard consistently that Comcast is 1) expensive, and 2) doesn't necessarily perform. FWIW.

I have tried digital broadcast TV via amplified antenna. Doesn't work well where we live; signal strength too low, despite what I read online about what it *should* be. Only recourse seems to be to mount a rooftop antenna. Not sure I want, or need, to do that.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

And one more makes three
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 16,378 views

Sam's Chowder House Palo Alto to become burger chain
By Elena Kadvany | 20 comments | 7,949 views

Secretary of Plate
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 4,113 views

New York College Tours
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,551 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 3 comments | 379 views

 

Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.

DONATE HERE