Town Square

Post a New Topic

Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi

Original post made by Agree with Guthrie, Greater Miranda, on Feb 16, 2010

If you dare, read this scathing letter to Nancy Pelosi from Dennis L. Guthrie, an attorney,(Mercer University, 1969 JD, Phi Alpha Delta), Vietnam veteran ( National Defense Medal and 2 Bronze Stars), U.S. District Court, Eastern, Middle and Western Districts of North Carolina; U.S. Tax Court; Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals; Vice-Justice, District XIV, 1968 - 1969; Board of Directors of both Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts etc. ( Remaining credentials are listed below the letter)

This story contains 1003 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (20)

Like this comment
Posted by Proud American
a resident of College Terrace
on Feb 16, 2010 at 7:55 am

Well said.

Like this comment
Posted by Guthrie is strange
a resident of Stanford
on Feb 16, 2010 at 8:55 am

My, my , my it seems that Mr Guthrie has really gotten upset. He rants and raves about people who "are exercising their rights upon which this country was founded" (as he puts it). Yet denies Ms Pelosi the same right. He also denigrates Ms Fonda, who also exercised her rights upon which this country was founded. In fact, if you go back to the Vietnam War days people were told to either support america or leave it--no discord or disagreement allowed. Fast forward to the last 8 years and people who dared to question the previous administration were called unpatriotic and accused of aiding Al Qeida.
[Portion removed.]

Like this comment
Posted by John
a resident of Ventura
on Feb 16, 2010 at 9:53 am

If I recall correctly, Speaker Pelosi made those remarks in the midst of the allegedly "spontaneous" demonstrations orchestrated by the ultra-right. Thankfully, after some of the demonstrations started to get very ugly with very racist overtones, the more moderate Republican leadership backed off. Ms. Pelosi was correct, and Mr. Guthrie incorrect.

Also, Mr. Guthrie, who accuses Speaker Pelosi of being a "Marxist" who hasn't read the Constitution, apparently chooses to ignore some key clauses in the Constitution, such as the establishment of the Socialistic institutions of the Post Office and post roads, and, the fact that the Federal Government is indeed established IN THE PREAMBLE to "promote the general Welfare".

David McCullough’s book on John Adams is indeed a fine book, but, apparently Mr. Guthrie needs to re-read it, along with more history, so that he understands the history better.

"Capitalism" was not a well-defined concept back then, but, clearly the Founders envisioned a mix of private enterprise and government enterprise, both at the Federal an individual state level. It was clearly understood, for example, that public roads usually made sense, although private roads and ferries were also common.

However, lest we forget, the Founders were not perfect-- they were unable to resolve the question of slavery, and left it for another day. They also left unresolved the question of banks-- some would say that, in an era of banks "too big to fail", that the question has again become unresolved.

In short, I find Mr. Guthrie's letter shallow, poorly researched, and unconvincing.

Now, the issue that precipitated all this, President Obama's initiative to find a way for all Americans to have at least basic health care, appears to have stalled, in large part due to the willingness of the ultra-right to support the large health insurance providers. I guess the "danger" must be over, considering the huge premium increases recently proposed by Anthem Blue Cross.

Like this comment
Posted by Guthrie is strange
a resident of Stanford
on Feb 16, 2010 at 3:27 pm

"It was written last August, in the midst of her horrifying statements about us who disagreed with her'
Which "horrifying statements" are you referring to?

"He pretty much sums up how I believe most Americans feel about this 3rd most powerful person in the USA"
Please provide some proof for this.

In reading Guthrie's sad diatribe once again, I also notice the derogatory terms he uses for gay people and how he also denigrates immigrants. Sounds to me that Guthrie is the person who is actually "despicable and un-American". I guess he feels that if he lists his long resume, that will somehow make his comments okay. What a sad statement from an irrational person.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 16, 2010 at 3:58 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Captain Guthrie seems to have validated his patriotism in the trenches rather than at academic teas. If Jane Fondas' collaboration was patriotic, then the 911 skyjackers should be given posthumous citizenship and medals. Check your Constitution and see if the printer left out the definition of treason. It is right there in my copy.
Capitalism not well defined? What is to define? I have goods or services, someone desires those goods or services, we agree on a price. Socialism is almost the same without the "I have..."

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Guthrie
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Feb 16, 2010 at 6:12 pm

It is hard for those who don't understand what principles they are supporting to understand the principles of Guthrie. So, they will call this writer "un-American" or "irrational", claim that there is no basis in fact, or claim that the "general welfare" clause refers to their definition of welfare, which is the massive growth of govt and transfer of wealth in hopes of attaining some utopian ideal, while attaining instead the exact opposite of their goals..the destruction of workers across this nation.

I would feel pity for these people and try to educate them, except that I have decided that most people who are belligerantly far left such as some I see in Congress, the media or blogs, are willfully choosing to remain ignorant, so there is no hope for them to learn. And my pity is used up when I remember they vote for people who promote policies that are against our welfare and the welfare of our children. So I no longer feel pity, just anger.

The good news is that most Americans have awoken, and understand what is happening. America will throw out all the socialists/marxists, and rise back up...putting us back to work, raising the level of living back up to where it was etc. In other words, with a conservative ascendency, we will cut unemployment in half again including putting the poor back to work and getting them off of welfare, which will bring more money into the tax coffers for education and help for those who really need other words, we will go back to achieving the the classical liberal dream of every person educated and employed and free to live his life as he sees fit..through right wing policies, ie the America has it has been since 1982.

For the rest of us who already know this, this letter is awesome.

Like this comment
Posted by Anony Mouse
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 16, 2010 at 8:43 pm

Anony Mouse is a registered user.

I know I'm just a dumb liberal, bent on the destruction of the United States, but did this guy win 2 Bronze Star Medals, as claimed in his "Credentials"? A cursory search indicates that maybe he didn't.

Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by Anony Mouse
a resident of Community Center
on Feb 16, 2010 at 9:07 pm


Did Mr. Cheney "validate his patriotism in Vietnam?" Just checking. He had other priorities...

Jane Fonda went to North Vietnam and opposed the war, some Democrats opposed the war. Ergo Democrats are not patriots. Ergo Pelosi is a traitor. Huh? A bit of a stretch isn't it?

Like this comment
Posted by Bogus Like A Three Dollar Bill
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 16, 2010 at 9:11 pm

Another one of these totally-bogus, made-up letters meant to try to inflame folks. They're sent out as email chain letters, encouraging recipients to post it on forums like this.

Like this comment
Posted by Anony Mouse
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Feb 16, 2010 at 9:20 pm

Check Snopes. It's real. He even put it on his law firm's letterhead. I bet his partners loved that move.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 17, 2010 at 2:06 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

The military specifically requested the college deferment to increase the supply of officer candidates. In my opinion the draft was a big mistake and should never be reinstated. Jane Fonda, in violation of the laws then in effect. Her actions were not anti-war, they were pro Vietcong winning. The failure to prosecute her was a slap on the face of our troops and, for those with the prosecutorial responsibility, misprision of a felony. Pelosi is just a fool.

Like this comment
Posted by Guthrie is strange
a resident of Stanford
on Feb 17, 2010 at 6:35 am

I think Mr Guthrie's diatribe should be sent to all the organizations he lists on his resume. See how they feel being associated with a homophobic, racist, ant-free speech individual.

WIth regard to Mr wallis' comments--is the only way to validate your patriotism by serving in the trenches? So what does that say about all the chicken hawks from the Bush years?
While Mr wallis has his opinion about Ms Fonda, we may recall that she was never charged with a crime of treason. It is very nice that Mr Wallis can compare her to the 9/11 hijackers and cry treason--however his claims are empty and without merit.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 18, 2010 at 2:11 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
As I stated in my letter, the failure to prosecute Fonda and her hubby was an inexcusable unforgivable slap in the face of all serving troops. To be anti war one must oppose all war.
To suggest that I implied patriotism can only be served in the trenches is inconsistent with the criticism of my defense of deferments. The whole concept of chickenhawk is silly. One need not run into burning buildings to support fire departments or to consider fighting fires a good thing.

Like this comment
Posted by Guthrie is strange
a resident of Stanford
on Feb 18, 2010 at 7:32 am

"As I stated in my letter, the failure to prosecute Fonda and her hubby was an inexcusable unforgivable slap in the face of all serving troops"
Take that up with the government, Walter. In the meantime, she is not guilty of treason--maybe in your mind, but that does not count.

"To suggest that I implied patriotism can only be served in the trenches is inconsistent with the criticism of my defense of deferments."

You seemed to imply it with the statement you made (Captain Guthrie seems to have validated his patriotism in the trenches rather than at academic teas.)

"The whole concept of chickenhawk is silly."
Yes, especially when you have to defend people like cheney. Of course, you are selective about this concept--when it suit syou , you always bring up military service or point out the service of those you agree with. If you agree with them and they did not serve--not a problem. Hence your continued bitterness towards Jane Fonda--throwing around wild charges, after the fact.

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Guthrie
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Feb 20, 2010 at 5:01 am

Web Link

Above is a perfect example of what Guthrie is talking about..the Orwellian nature of our current Party-in-Charge.

We have heard about "support Obama's plan" for over a year..without having an Obama plan to read...we still don't have an Obama plan to read, but have had a Republican plan to read for months on the GOP site..but we heard OBAMA say in the State of the Union address he hasn't heard any ideas from the party of "No"...but he will meet with the Repubs in a bipartisan open-minded long as they are willing to adapt to HIS plan....and now we are hearing that ..finally...there will be a published plan of some sort before the meeting, being put together ONLY by Dems ( really bipartisan) consisting of more of the same we've had for the last year, and that come hell-or-high-water they will pass it using whatever trick they can.

Ok, all this from Yahoo-news, NOT exactly a "right wing conservative news blog", so...

'splain to me again Lucy how Guthrie's letter has no basis in fact?

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 20, 2010 at 11:52 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Someone is guilty of a crime at the moment they commit the crime. They are punished after the conviction. I did indeed take the failure to prosecute up with the government. I am not bitter about Hanoi Jane, I grieve at the craven incompetence of the poltroonly prosecutors who lacked the cojones to uphold the law.
I was not directly defending Cheney with that statement, I was defending the military's decision to defer students while they gained skills more needed than just a warm body. Ask any doctor from that era about the doctor draft.
I bring up my service only when it is relevant to the discussion. The concept of chickenhawk is silly because of the suggestion that people are not allowed to make mature judgments different than their earlier views.

Like this comment
Posted by The Health Care Show today
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Feb 25, 2010 at 5:46 pm

Down to 25% of all Americans supporting either the Congressional or the Senate bill.

we had 70% supporting the Iraq invasion.

um....ok..let's be real here..does anyone think it is a good idea to keep pounding this dead horse?

What about the public show on health care between the dems and the repubs today, led by BHO...presumably for "bipartisan" progress on health reform, where BHO berated the Repubs bills on the desk, and mandated twice the Dem speaking time as Repub time?

Does anyone really think this was good idea for BHO and the Dems?

Last...does it say anything at all about the "show" being during the time people none of us working folks could actually watch it live?

Who was left to watch it live??


Now watch the polls come out tomorrow "80% of those who watched it live agree with BHO"..and remember the audience left who could watch it.

Like this comment
Posted by John Prevette
a resident of another community
on Mar 27, 2010 at 12:17 pm

If Mr Guthrie finished Law school in 69 then Army service as Officer and claimed to be a Captin in RVN...Was he a JAG attorney and how the hell did he claim "in the trenches" in 70 and discharged in 71? I don't doubt his claim. But he his a disgrace to the grunts who were in the "BUSH". No real Viet Nam Veteran ever used the term in the trenches. And there is documents that show Officers did serve very short tours of duty to get their ticket punched and received awards that were denied to grunts. I find his claim of two Bronze Stars to be a sign of BS. I was a corpman with a Marine Unit and I received a "Combat Action Ribbon", the Army had Combat Infantry Badge", that my friends is the badge that tell it all. Without a "CIB" he has an in the rear, paper pushing non-combat Officer.
John Prevette USN, Ret.

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Guthrie
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Apr 7, 2010 at 6:03 am

The writer of this letter is absolutely correct, the gentleman above who takes exception to the writer's credentials notwithstanding.

We have elected people who have abandoned all that made us great. We have abandoned JFKs "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country", MLKs "judge not by the color of skin, but by the content of character", Reagan's "Peace through Strength"..and reverted back to FDRs assertion that government needs to assure "a chicken in every pot" and cower in the corner as tyranny grows.

Sad times.

Throw every retroactive "progressive" a la FDR out of office, no matter whether they are Repub or Dems. Throw out Pelosi, McCain, Reid, Collins etc. Anyone who wants more government control over us and less federal protection of our security....get them OUT.

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Guthrie
a resident of Meadow Park
on Apr 7, 2010 at 8:59 pm

Web Link

link above is common knowledge amongst conservatives..half of all households pay NO fed income tax..and what exactly is not "fair" to the poor about this? And WHY are we trying to tax the earners yet more??

Just more proof in the pudding to support the assertions of the Dems being socialists, if not flat out marxists...

explain to me again why we have to steal from Peter to pay Paul and how this is "good" for society???

In fact, unbeknownst to most, the percentage of Americans paying FED taxes actually shrank under those horribly selfish Bush Repubs...

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

And one more makes three
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 11,170 views

Sam's Chowder House Palo Alto to become burger chain
By Elena Kadvany | 10 comments | 4,279 views

Secretary of Plate
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 3,478 views

New York College Tours
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 1,375 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 1 comment | 205 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.