Town Square

Post a New Topic

Sex-offender ban eyed near colleges

Original post made by sue, Gunn High School, on Aug 16, 2008

This story contains 131 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by john
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 16, 2008 at 1:50 pm

I certainly support keeping sex offenders away from campuses, some students are under 18 and the 18-21yrs old are vulnerable more so with alcohol around.

There should be a technical solution such as implanting an identification chip or a GPS monitoring system.

I realize these felons have to live somewhere, probably some sort of camp would be best, far away from kids and vulnerable young people.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter E. Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 16, 2008 at 2:41 pm

Devil's Island? Yes, the technological solution is the best hope. Internal exile - let's ask the Tsar how well that worked out.
Another solution is to get away from this Nancy-pants coddling and bring back penal servitude that is indeed servitude.

Like this comment
Posted by mary
a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 16, 2008 at 4:47 pm

A few of the vagrants on University or on the offenders website and one hangs around Pete's by Whole Foods.

What sort of area is proposed for the ban? one mile from campus?

Off campus Stanford student housing extends to MV, RWC and MP how practical is that?

Like this comment
Posted by sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 16, 2008 at 11:58 pm

I believe Stanford has as strong policy, but Palo Alto does not, the predators have free range here, why is that?

Like this comment
Posted by Ben
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 17, 2008 at 7:25 am

Sharon: Sex Offenders must comply with California law. Both Stanford and Palo Alto must also comply with California law. An initiative was passed by the voters of California which says where sex offenders may and may not live. However, that does not stop an initiative regarding colleges being placed on the ballot at some future time.

Like this comment
Posted by tj
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 17, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Sex offenders have rights. Society has rights. Balancing the two is the issue.

Felons lose their right to vote. Sex offenders lose their right to privacy. Both are the result of having been convicted of a crime in a court of law.

Whose rights demand greater protection, a young female sexually assaulted or the person convicted of sexually assaulting her?

Both have rights which should be protected in a democratic system of laws. If we must err, I would err on the side of the victim. The perpertrator chose the course of action, the victim did not. A choice which will be wrong in some cases, but right in most.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Tava Kitchen shutters in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 20,982 views

Top 6 Issues Affecting Seniors to keep an eye on as Donald Trump takes over
By Max Greenberg | 6 comments | 3,386 views

By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,352 views

Packing for the Women's March
By Sally Torbey | 9 comments | 805 views