Town Square

Post a New Topic

Should Peninsula Cities Consider Congestion Pricing

Original post made by Mike, College Terrace, on Mar 31, 2008

Web Link

Why not?

Would lit help us qualify for Federal mass transport funds?

Would it stimulate a further development in better mass transit - even if privately run?

Let's think about this.

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter E. Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 31, 2008 at 8:53 pm

Congestion pricing would be just one more reason for me to stay away. I see little reason, now, to mass workers in one location. If your product is information you can work anywhere.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Becky Trout
Palo Alto Weekly staff writer
on Apr 1, 2008 at 12:21 pm

Becky Trout is a registered user.

Hi all,

Just thought I'd weigh in -- congestion pricing, or variable-priced toll lanes, is being seriously considered for the Bay Area. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission is the agency in charge. Councilwoman Yoriko Kishimoto is PA's rep on this.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jane
a resident of Professorville
on Apr 1, 2008 at 2:04 pm



a terrible idea, another socialist means of raising taxes. i am in favor of private toll roads or lanes in some areas, but keep the government out of that business


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 1, 2008 at 3:35 pm

They don't charge you to rid elevators whose only function is to make that building tenable. Transit is to make high rise work, so let high rise pay for it.
I am a railfan from way back, but get real.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 1, 2008 at 4:01 pm

The only place I could see it work on the Peninsula, apart from freeways, would be places like University Ave, Castro Street or other downtown type streets, possibly El Camino. The reason, I would then easily avoid them and those that feel they must drive them to park outside their favorite store(?) could pay for the privilege and the rest of us would be safer while we walked there.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Future Driving
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2008 at 7:53 am

At some stage in the future all cars will be wearing "fast track" just to drive down the street - I see the future and it is here!!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Paul
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 2, 2008 at 1:31 pm

This is simply another way to fleece and torture people who must navigate jammed roads get to an 8:00 AM job.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wilson
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 4, 2008 at 11:32 am

Anything that will help to get business to move from Palo Alto and help us return to the nice pastoral ways of the past should be tried! and Retried until most of the people are out of our face.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by FasTrak
a resident of Professorville
on Apr 4, 2008 at 5:37 pm

Paying bridge tolls has been traditional in the Bay Area for over 70 years. Electronic toll collection, the FasTrak system, now makes it easy and efficient to include designated freeway lanes and city streets as toll roads during commute hours. When toll money goes directly to maintain the roads and bridges in the toll program, I am all for it.

Just a 3% change in vehicle count makes the difference between bumper-to-bumper traffic and free-flowing traffic.

During commute hours, freeway diamond lanes should be available for use by toll-paying single passenger vehicles and free for vehicles with 2 passengers or more.

In Palo Alto, the streets designated as traffic arteries seem the most logical to include in congestion pricing toll programs; same deal, free for vehicles with 2 passengers or more; otherwise, toll.

With wireless electronic sensors, fiber optics, and sophisticated data base software, a fair and flexible toll system should be easy and cost-effective to design, install, and maintain.

Let's do it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Donald
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 4, 2008 at 9:43 pm

This is not a matter of punishing those who must drive. It is a matter of making people pay for the costs they impose on society. We have subsidized car drivers for far too long and abosrbed their costs into general funds. When I buy a tire for my bicycle the sales tax is used to build freeways that prohibit bikes. When a car driver's pollution causes lung disease we all pay for higher medical insurance. When car drivers crash into each other we all pay for the police and paramedics who deal with the afermath. We need to stop subsidizing single occupant vehicles and make them pay their fair share. The funds raised can help mitigate the negative consequences of automobile use.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 1,534 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,175 views

The Future of our Parks: Public Workshops this Week
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 582 views

NO MEAT ATHLETE Workout/Running Group
By Max Greenberg | 2 comments | 510 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 485 views