Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 7, 2008
though this project is slated as a "green project" with LEED rating, in my opinion, the rendering of the building is hideous. what on earth does that kind of building have to do with palo alto, the weekly, or mayfield? this project seems to be architectural pollution in a city with already too many fugly "new" and "modern" buildings. as far as i can tell, the building itself doesn't incorporate many sustainable tactics as a whole. i'm sure there will be low VOC paints, recycled carpets, concrete with fly ash, etc.. but from the building shell, the only thing green about it is the glass. the weekly ought to have a design competition or at least hire someone with some sense of design appropriate for the needs. this building is going to look so bland and out of style 10 years within completion.
Looks great to me; modern and very contemporary. It will complement the proposed new granite sculpture at the bottom of California Avenue.
I'm happy to see the PA Weekly looking forward to the future with a "green" contemporary building. Also, you will be improving a very mediocre and uninspiring section of Cambridge Avenue with this new building.
In a slowing economy with a falling real estate market, doesn't seem too wise to be investing money in a new commercial building.
But hey, good luck anyway. Hope you find good tenants that can help you pay for it.
Hmmmm, Weekly reduces their staff to two (2) reporters who also probably get paid less than $35k, but decides to spend millions on a new building?
Most newspapers are cutting costs and reducing staff so it is interesting that our beloved biweekly is actually moving into larger space for its staff of 50. I didn't realise that all the hot air we spout on this Forum was quite so lucrative!
This helps us understand why the Weekly sides with Jim Baer in every development in which he is involved, like Alma Plaza, the Pacific Art League building, Edgewood Plaza and so on.
It is hard to take the opposite side from someone with whom you are so enmeshed.
ar - For clarification: We have more than two reporters on staff.
The Weekly reduced its "staff reporters" down to two (2) sometime last year. Similar to how the Merc reduced its staff size, probably due to loss of ad revenue. I wouldn't be surprised since Google is having the same problems with lost ad revenue.
5 million, how many square feet?
Well, if it's tough making a living pushing out a biweekly newspaper; go into the real estate business - simple, just diversify!!!
story says 10k
seems like no-brainer - they're paying rent so why not buy? Homeowners do it all the time.
10k, you're right, if it had been a snake it would have bit me. thanks dd
So $500 a square foot. Maybe if we can't get Stanford's contractors to build our library at 450 a square foot, we should be taking to the weekly's contractors.
Will they finally hire a copy editor?
I sure hope they add more real estate ads....as it is, they only take up half the paper.
More knitting articles! More stories on retirees that...without any training at all...have taken up "painting". Expanded coverage on "floral designers".
Tyler, Excellent movie reviews!
architecture design lab, You get today's award for the most boring, pompous comment.
So the Weekly has been covering stories about Jim Baer's big developments all over town without telling the reader that he is the Weekly's business partner?
Am I the only one who is troubled by this?
Now I Get It, Did it ever occur to you that the articles on Jim Baer projects were written BEFORE The Weekly became his "business partner"?
Architecture Design Lab, Sounds like you're just jealous because your firm didn't get the job. As my grandmother use to say, "It's not professional to knock the competition."
And my mother still says, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." But I guess she wouldn't feel at home on TownSquare.
I am referring to an important local newspaper which we count on for objective information. And I am referring to current and forthcoming projects.
Did any of the stories about Alma Plaza have a disclaimer so people would know the connection between the Weekly and this particular developer?
In the Weekly article it says, "The project is being managed by local developer Jim Baer, who jointly purchased the land with the Weekly in 2006." I can think of many articles written in 2007 about Alma Plaza that did not carry any disclaimer. Poor journalism practice in not including a disclosure. Oh well it's just the Weekly that seems to have lost its journalistic ethical roots.
Does "jointly" mean 50-50, or some other ratio that might be as little as 95-5?
If I'm not mistaken, the Weekly ran an article last spring when the building was before the ARB for approval saying it might develop it as its office, depending on the costs. So this isn't news...
Some people seem to be uncomfortable with the subject of ethics so they keep changing the subject.
When a developer is building a house or office building for you, you are deeply involved with him. Your relationship with that person is very important. It involves many meetings and conversations, and large amounts of money.
The Weekly has been covering stories about Baer's projects and not mentioning how deeply involved they are with him. It is time to re-read the stories about Alma Plaza and the Pacific Art Building. These are not trivial projects.
The newspaper influences public opinion as well as the city council about how those decisions are made.That's why this is important.
The Weekly is highly regarded around town, so this is a real jolt
The Weekly was hardly kind to JOhn McNellis, the developer of Alma Plaza. Stories and editorials were not supportive of him as I recall. Maybe they bent over backwards to be hard on him because of their dealings with Baer? I think you are trying to make an issue without any facts. Trolling for what?
ar- Trust me, we have more than two reporters on staff. I can't really comment on ad revenue since I'm in the editorial department, but I promise you we have more than two staff writers. Arden Pennell, Becky Trout and Don Kazak are all considered "staff writers." Sue Dremann also does a great deal of writing for the Weekly.
OrangePro- Thanks for the compliment! Although I've had to cut back a bit on writing movie reviews, I still love doing it. There are some intriguing pictures coming out in 2008 (action fans are in for a real treat, as James Bond, Iron Man and Harry Potter all hit the big screen).
Now I get it (and others)- The Palo Alto Weekly takes great pride in presenting fair and balanced news. As long as I've been here (8 years now), and from what I understand since the Weekly's inception in 1979, the newspaper has held an incredibly high journalistic ethic. Editor Jay Thorwaldson and Managing Editor Jocelyn Dong are among the most admirable journalists I've ever met, and both demand the same journalistic ethic that has personified the Weekly for nearly 30 years. The editorial department and the business/advertising side of the operation are kept very separate -- a "firewall" is maintained. It's a shame that the knee-jerk reaction is to immediately assume favoritism or biased reporting is automatically taking place. Every reporter and editor on staff is very respectful of (and takes great pride in) the position we each have. We hold ourselves to the highest standards, which above all else means presenting the news in a fair and balanced way.
Once again, you're skirting the facts.
Fact is the Weekly lost Molly Tannenbaum last year and never replaced her. Hence, the Weekly is down one reporter.
Wish you'd tell the truth!
Molly Tannenbaum also covered Alma Plaza. Coincidentally since she's been gone, there hasn't been much news on it, and coincidentally, not much progress on it either. And who's to suffer? Every time I drive by it all I see are the windows boarded up.
ar- We do miss Molly, she was a terrific reporter. Not trying to skirt the facts here ar, just correcting some misinformation. You stated that we had only two staff reporters and I'm simply clarifying that we have more than two. Yes, we never replaced the land-use beat position that Molly covered, but Becky, Arden, Don and Sue have done a very admirable job in her absence.
I didn't know anything about the controversy about Baer's offer to the Pacific Art League until I read it in the Daily. Then the Weekly got around to it. The Weekly didn't cover the meetings and the controversial issues, namely Baer's low offer for the building.
Firewall or not, the details of that very local, very interesting story were not adequately covered. The controversy didn't reflect well on Baer but it should have been page 1 news while it was going on, not just at the end.
The Weekly has fewer reporters this year than it did last year and the news is suffering for it, yet the publisher would rather spend millions on an investment in real estate than on investigative reporting.
Ofcourse you're only going to come out with positive things to say about your employer, that's why you cannot be a trusted and unbiased voice in this debate.
If you care about news, put your money where your mouth is and invest in investigative reporters. This is the fault of the Weekly, the Mercury News, and many newspapers across the country who seem only too eager to take money away from the newsroom and put it in real estate in a declining real estate market.
As one of the Trustees that sold the property to Jim Baer, it was never obvious during the sale that Mr. Baer was a partner with the Weekly. We were told there was a possibility the Weekly might lease the existing building after it was remodeled.
Mr. Baer may not have been a partner with the Weekly at the time the property was sold.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,774 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,748 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,227 views
A quiet moment
By Sally Torbey | 8 comments | 532 views
Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 465 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.