Nuclear Power not Efficient Enough
Original post made by Richard on Mar 5, 2008
Here are a couple of excerpts from the article:
"Nuclear energy production must increase by more than 10 percent each year from 2010 to 2050 to meet all future energy demands and replace fossil fuels, but this is an unsustainable prospect. According to a report published in Inderscience's International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology such a large growth rate will require a major improvement in nuclear power efficiency otherwise each new power plant will simply cannibalize the energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants."
"However, it is the whole-of-life cycle analysis that Pearce has investigated that shows nuclear power is far from the "emission-free panacea" claimed by many of its proponents. Each stage of the nuclear-fuel cycle including power plant construction, mining/milling uranium ores, fuel conversion, enrichment (or de-enrichment of nuclear weapons), fabrication, operation, decommissioning, and for short- and long-term waste disposal contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, he explains."
I guess there ain't no such thing as a free lunch, and that includes nukes.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 2,185 views
Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,910 views
It's the End of the World as We Know It: "Snowpiercer"
By Anita Felicelli | 1 comment | 1,463 views