Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Dec 12, 2007
A Google search yesterday provided links into the Palo Alto web site, which had not happened in the recent past. Figured that something had changed, but given how uncommunicative the city was when the original web site was launched, trying to talk to anyone at City Hall about it proved difficult.
The fact that the Civica software was incompatible with Google's "crawlers" certainly should have been determined by the city prior to signing any contracts.
Guess the old adage "live and learn" applies here. (This is if the city actually learned anything.)
"Civica software was incompatible with Google's "crawlers"
And pundits are saying that Palo Alto should not sue Civica? Can someone tell me what enterprise - public or private - is served by not being able to be accessed by Google?
This is an egregious contract breach. Civica should be sent a demand letter.
> This is an egregious contract breach. Civica should
> be sent a demand letter.
This is the City's fault, or at least, its lack of technical expertise is/was showing.
Even if the City had a claim, the legal fees alone would not make this worth the effort.
However, by removing the Civica code, the access to the other modules which Civica offered makes any future expansion of this site problematic without a lot of work.
There's not much satisfaction in saying, "We told you so," when all the money has already been paid to Civica.
And yes, it is the city's fault. Civica provides plenty of information about its "capabilities" on its site, along with examples of cities using its software. If we had any web-savvy staffers, this would never have happened.
Maybe we would have had some web-savvy staffers if certain citizens weren't always trying to nickel and dime city operations in a way that is penny wise, and pound foolish
I give them credit for making some progress. I searched for "my" heritage tree, and it showed up easily in the listings, plus, unlike the first edition of the web site, they now have the tree report and photos up.
Also I searched for creek monitor, and that showed up as the second result (google itself popped it up in first place.)
Lots more work to do, but they have done something. I suspect the reason they got no positive feedback is that people gave up on the site and haven't been visiting it.
Another 30 THOUSAND to fix this?? We're still being duped.
> Maybe we would have had some web-savvy staffers
> if certain citizens weren't always trying to nickel
> and dime city operations in a way that is penny wise,
> and pound foolish
City financing doesn't work that way. The City has a lot of money and IT people are well paid. This is a management issue that goes to the top of the management chain.
I would have done the whole thing for 25k. Nice work PA.
Palo Alto isn't learning a thing. Someone made out like a bandit. Maybe there is a connection between a decision maker in Palo Alto and the web design firm?
Who in their crazy mind would pay $500k for a stupid website? Even paying $25k is a waste. It is a website for a city, not a business. Files aren't being uploaded and downloaded by users, supply chains are not reacting to user data. Spending 5 figures for a website is crazy enough...but $500k?
The fact that no heads rolled or jobs were terminated at Palo Alto is a testament to apathy of Palo Alto residents. In Menlo Park (I'm on the border), we supported a recall of some Council members for buying into real estate and into a private business. While that is outright criminal, paying $500k for monkey work coding of a website is just insane.
I don't think we have any right to criticize those idiots in City Hall. We let them get away with it. There is no outcry. There is no angry letter writing campaign. You just gave them a blank check for another stupid project. Sorry for being harsh, but you know we deserve it for sitting on our hands.
Search has hugely improved. Not only does the search take less than 10 seconds, it actually provides links. The old search used to return blank pages on the same keywords.
Now if the city would only replace the rest of the Civica CMS and use a non-proprietary content management system so they could rebid the website contract.
It is interesting how naive the comments are in this blog. People want to focus only on things that don't work or mistakes City staffers make, but what about all the other things that work? Did your property value not stay up in the top in the current downturn? Yes, the school district has much to do with it, but it is not the only thing. What about all the community services offers? go search the beautiful websites of other cities and tell me which city offers a $22 million budget for such services. If you don't like what you get.......move!!!
Maslow, perhaps you can start a thread to list items the government deserves praise for. That would be more constructive than suggesting your neighbors move rather than object to things they don't like.
Personally I doubt that "city services" are a huge factor in maintaining housing values in PA. But maybe I'm wrong. Which community services do you think are so stellar that they drive housing values?
The search has vastly improved, sure. But it brings up quantities of irrelevant matter, unlike Google itself which usually has the most pertinent items right on top.
Look for something happening this week and you get 2004, 2002 etc.
The organization of the material is screwy. Usually not in time order.
And the introductory material was written for strangers or children. You have to page down through lots of useless text again and again to find something you specifically searched for.
And you can't find things that aren't posted. Whose job is that? The city calendar is useless unless you are looking for children's stuff.
For what audience was this thing designed?
I was just searching for a meeting and the text says (several times) that the meeting will be televised on Channel 16. Is anything televised on 16? I assume they meant Channel 26.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Sneak peek: Bradley's Fine Diner in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,312 views
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,631 views
Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,598 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,524 views
It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 811 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.