Town Square

Post a New Topic

Measures M & N easily win

Original post made on Nov 7, 2007

Palo Alto city officials expected Measure M and Measure N to easily win Tuesday night, but the margins of victory were larger than anticipated.



Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 11:08 PM

Comments (4)

Posted by Casey, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 7, 2007 at 8:26 am

Raising the hotel tax from 10% to 12% is one way to boost revenues. However, increasing the number of hotels allows the city to widen its tax base instead of just hiking the tax on the same small population of people. Hope this doesn't spark a vicious cycle where fewer people stay at Palo Alto hotels, more Palo Alto hotels close, and we have to keep increasing the tax to keep revenue neutral.


Posted by Marvin, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Nov 7, 2007 at 8:30 am

More hotels=more traffic. Is this what the city wants?

City leaders and neighborhood leaders are constantly whining about too much traffic.

City needs to decide soon which way it wants to go--you cannot have vistors/shoppers/tourists without traffic


Posted by Another Tax Payer, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Nov 7, 2007 at 10:25 am

Well, I voted against the tax increase precisely for the reasons stated by Casey. People won't want to shop or stay here if it's cheaper to go to Menlo Park, Los Altos, or Mountain View, all of which are close by and have lovely downtowns. So fewer car trips can be achieved afterall, with the price that eventually will be paid for with a less vibrant community.

(As it is, when we have guests from out of town, they rarely stay in Palo Alto hotels because we already have an expensive zip code. They just get in their rental cars and *drive* to tour Stanford's campus.)


Posted by Realist, a resident of Professorville
on Nov 9, 2007 at 7:17 pm

Addressing the previous three postings. First of all, when was the last time you called a hotel to find out what their tax rate was before you committed to staying? We are a society of convenience the tax rate means that we are paying $2 to $3 more per room night, so you think that the average person will drive to Menlo or Mt. View to save that amount? What about the gasoline prices?

If you don't have the visitors you wont have the hotel or sales tax to fix the streets that you use, so the traffic generation should not be the only worry. We have one "regular" grocery store, Safeway, in town for a reason. We generate more trips by going to Menlo and Mt. View to do our shopping to bigger stores, not to mention Costco and Home Depot in other Cities. We need to reevaluate our non-in-my-back-yard attitude, if we want things to get fixed.

Don't put all on City Leaders - we are all in the picture!!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Gourmet hot dogs, sausage food truck coming to the Peninsula
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 2,812 views

Allowing Unauthorized Immigrants to Learn and Earn Legally Will Help the Economy
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,238 views

Is HBO's Silicon Valley Any Good?
By Anita Felicelli | 16 comments | 1,665 views

College applications: round three
By Sally Torbey | 24 comments | 1,663 views

PAUSD Leadership Challenges
By Paul Losch | 14 comments | 1,159 views