Town Square

Post a New Topic

City to pay for repairs of Roth Building

Original post made by Bill D'Agostino, Palo Alto Weekly reporter, on Jun 6, 2006

The City of Palo Alto failed to prevent water damage to its historic Roth Building during the past two winters and will now have to take $415,000 from its reserves for needed repairs and improvements.


The City Council unanimously agreed to spend that money Monday night.


"The purpose of the improvements is to prevent further structural deterioration until the building is improved and developed for its long-term use," according to a staff report.


The Palo Alto Historical Association hopes to turn the Spanish Colonial-style building, at 300 Homer Avenue, into the city's first local history museum. In March 2004, the council accepted a proposal from the group, and asked city staff to negotiate a lease.


But those negotiations have taken longer than anyone expected, at least in part because of the water damage. Originally, the city offered the building to a nonprofit "as is," but the group argued the city should pay for harm caused because the city failed to properly protect it from the elements.


The $415,000 will be used to install a new drain system, fix the roof and basement, seal the windows and make other repairs.


The final agreement with the history museum is expected to return to the council in July. The group will need to raise approximately $5.5 million to renovate the building. So far, it's raised $2 million, according to city staff.


Birge Clark, one of the area's preeminent architects, designed the 1932 building. For nearly 70 years, it housed the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.


(Published on Palo Alto Online 6/6/06)

Comments (1)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Steven M
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 6, 2006 at 5:16 pm

Why in the world didn't the city immediately repair the roof and whatever else necessary to protect this building from further damage when it received it from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation? If this had been done at that point, the taxpayers wouldn't now be having to spend even more money. It's a tragedy to see the Roth building rot away, knowing that someone was eventually going to have to pour money into rehabilitating it.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,912 views

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 36 comments | 2,546 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,989 views

Mothers, daughters, books, and boxes
By Sally Torbey | 4 comments | 1,171 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,060 views