Physicist turned filmmaker Mark Levinson gets (and thrillingly shares) VIP access to that moment, as those physicists rev up CERN's Large Hadron Collider to reproduce the conditions just after the Big Bang. Or as David Kaplan of Johns Hopkins University (also a producer on the film) half-jokes, that's what they're telling people. The real reason for the experiments is "trying to understand the basic laws of nature," a goal with no military or commercial application but epochal implications for human knowledge.
Levinson has chosen articulate spokespeople in Dimopoulos, Kaplan, Harvard's Nima Arkani-Hamed, Italy's Fabiola Gianotti, CERN's Martin Aleksa, "Beam Operation Leader" Mike Lamont, and post-doc Monica Dunford. Covering the period between 2007 and 2012, Levinson's film pulls from over 500 hours of footage assembled by legendary editor Walter Murch ("The Conversation," "The English Patient"), a three-time Oscar winner, as it observes CERN's search for the Higgs particle, the center of the standard model of elementary particles.
The spectacularly epic machinery itself makes for a great visual — especially true of the five-story open ATLAS Detector used to collect massive amounts of data (Joss Whedon seemed to be visually alluding to it in the opening scenes of "The Avengers") — and the film occasionally spins off into animated montage to illustrate a point. But the drama is on a human scale: The film efficiently reminds us of how CERN had to play politics, dispel hysterical fears, weather a media frenzy and present its results under intense public scrutiny. On the brighter side, this is a tremendous international success story, made possible by transcending borders and partisanship.
In a way, that's also true of the two types of particle physicists shown in the documentary — experimentalists and theorists — who are given thrilling reason to work side by side. As we learn about each school's competing theories — super symmetry versus the multiverse — tension mounts. Should a winner be declared, the "losing" theorists risk having "wasted" decades intellectually pursuing wild geese down blind alleys.
If the film disappoints, it only does so by not being yet more rigorous in its scientific detail. With six scientists to meet, so much territory to cover, and suspense to build on top of it all, "Particle Fever" inevitably feels as if it's just skimming the surface of a fascinating subject. Still, even a science dunce will walk away with a basic understanding of the project and a strong impression of the community around this important research. Better yet, here is a film about the idealistic pursuit of knowledge: something we should all be able to agree upon admiring.
Not rated. One hour, 39 minutes.
— Peter Canavese