Since then, the golf-course project has taken on a life of its own, expanding far beyond flood control. Over the past year, the City Council has enthusiastically expanded the reconstruction of the Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course to include all 18 holes as well as a new irrigation system, restroom, golf-cart paths, a "youth golf area," room for up to five athletic playing fields and a reduction of irrigated turf from 135 to 81 acres.
On Monday, as the ambitious golf course overhaul received its final approval from the City Council, members learned that the very flood-control effort that inspired the golf-course project may end up delaying it, with potentially costly ramifications.
Rob de Geus, assistant director of the Community Services Department, said the city has been losing about $100,000 in revenues a month as it prepares the golf course for the renovation. A construction delay of a year could cost about $1 million, he said.
In a letter to the city earlier this month, an official from the regulatory San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board voiced concerns about approving the golf-course reconfiguration, arguing that doing so would preclude possible design changes for the downstream flood project. The latter project is being spearheaded by the regional San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (SFCJPA).
"This agency has significant concerns with the SFCJPA's current design for the flood-control project, and it is possible that the design in the SFCJPA's current application will not be approved by this agency," Dale Bowyer, section leader from the water board's Watershed Division wrote on Jan. 16. "Approving the current design proposal for the golf-course project would have the unfortunate effect of foreclosing potential options for improving the SFCJPA's flood-control design."
Bower cited the "significant overlap" between the two projects and maintained that handling the two projects separately "may constitute piecemealing of the two projects' impacts to San Francisquito Creek and adjacent habitat for listed species in the Faber Tract in East Palo Alto," referring to a Baylands site that is home to endangered species, including the clapper rail and harvest mouse.
City staff, for its part, defended on Monday its determination that the golf project should be reviewed independently from the downstream work.
Joe Teresi, senior engineer with the Public Works Department, encouraged the council to approve the Environmental Impact Review for the golf course project, despite the water board's concerns.
"They think there's a chance that the flood-control project may have to be modified to receive its permits and that might cause a domino effect (that will) affect the golf course," Teresi told the council, referring to water-board staff. "That's all theoretical. We feel strongly that the existing boundary between the creek project and the golf course project is the right boundary and that there is no downside to the council taking action on this item this evening."
City Manager James Keene said that while these issues are being resolved, the city needs to get all of its other approvals in place so that the golf project can start as soon as possible after the issuance of the water-board's permit.
"We're losing revenues this year just due to the reconfiguration we've already made," Keene said, referring to the city's rearrangement of several golf-course holes to accommodate stockpiling of soil. "I think we need to be as ready as possible for the time when we get the permits to be able to begin the project."
Len Materman, executive director of the creek authority, said his agency has modified its project to address concerns about the Faber Tract and endangered species. His agency, like the city, believes that the two projects should be "decoupled" and considered separately.
"We'd like nothing better than for the golf course configuration to be done irrespective of our work," Materman said.
Since the Jan. 16 letter from the water board, officials from the city, creek authority and water board have met to discuss the board's concerns. De Geus said the next two-to-three weeks will be particularly important in getting resolution.
While the council unanimously approved the Environmental Impact Report for the reconfiguration of the golf course on Monday, members expressed some concern about the possibility of delay and directed staff to do more number crunching and make sure the city's investment in the course doesn't end up costing the taxpayers millions of dollars down the road.
Under the current plan, the $9.5 million project would be funded primarily by a $3 million contribution from the creek authority and bonds that would be paid out from golf-course revenues. Councilman Larry Klein on Monday voiced some concerns about the prospect of revenues dipping because of construction delays and the city's General Fund getting stuck with the bill.
"This is really a risky investment by the city in my view," Klein said. "If projections don't play out, it's the General Fund that will be paying the COPs (certificates of participation)."
A delay could also have an even greater impact on residents in nearby flood-prone areas. If the creek authority doesn't get its permit soon, it might lose an entire construction season (work in the channel is restricted during the summer because of the presence of steelhead trout).
"There are a lot of life-safety elements to this decision also," Keene said, adding that he hopes this consideration will factor into the water board's determination.
In approving the environmental review of the golf-course plan, the council also endorsed a strategy for compensating for the loss of 588 trees from the Baylands area. The city plans to plant 300 native trees on the golf course and protect 500 oak saplings at the Arastradero Preserve. It will also restore at least 2 acres of native habitat at Byxbee Park, near the course.
Even with the regulatory complications, council members were unanimous in approving the golf course project, which Pat Burt referred to last year as a "win-win-win-win." For the council, the four wins -- which refer to flood protection, habitat restoration, space for new playing fields and a better golf course -- remain applicable, even with the new regulatory hurdle raising questions about near-term revenues.
In recognition of the new regulatory hurdle, the council directed staff to provide "financial metrics" showing how much revenue would need to be maintained for the golf course to continue to operate. This provision was proposed by Klein, who said it would "place some limitation on how much financial risk the General Fund would take."
Greg Scharff, who seconded Klein's motion, called the reconfiguration an "exciting project."
"I'm glad we're moving forward," Scharff said. "I think it's a win-win situation."
This story contains 1171 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.