But five parents who waited until the bullying item came up after 1 a.m. expressed frustration that, after a year of work to revise bullying policies, the new policies apply only to legally "protected" classes of students, based on such characteristics as race, disability and sexual preference.
"I believed we were going to protect all students — not just protected classes — and now I stand before you and ask, 'What happened?'" parent Christina Schmidt said.
"You had a well-crafted policy. It took a long time to get to it and a lot of people worked on it and — after sending these documents around and having them approved by everyone — they're now off the table."
Skelly said he would return to the board by March with a general bullying policy.
"I understand the frustration of the speakers but, frankly, we're just not there yet," he said. "I can't bring something to the board that runs the risk of turning every issue that can be a learning experience between two kids in a classroom into something that has to be reported to the district level and run the risk of not having these things resolved where they could be real learning experiences for folks."
This story contains 265 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.