Both factors did not add up to a winnable case under the law, Hendrickson said.
"When a little boy on his bike gets hit by a vehicle and grievously injured through no fault of his own, the tragic nature and unfairness of that incident cry out for someone to be held accountable.
"But not all wrongs can be righted or even addressed by the criminal justice system. We are constrained by the law and by our ethical obligation as district attorneys to enforce the laws fairly and without regard for sympathy or bias for or against any particular party," she said.
The DA's office has studied the case since March. Deputy District Attorney Duffy Magilligan, who is in charge of the case, did an exhaustive search of all permutations of the law for any that could be applied to the case, she said. But ultimately, only a misdemeanor charge for driving with a suspended license with a prior conviction for the same charge could be applied. If convicted, Hau could face up to a year in county jail, she said.
Lerrick was on his way to school at 7:19 a.m. when Hau's Nissan Quest struck him from behind, breaking his bicycle frame in two and damaging the Nissan's front bumper, hood and windshield. The boy was wearing a bike helmet, but he sustained a leg and wrist fracture, a broken jaw, broken teeth and brain swelling, according to a police report. He still suffers traumatic brain injuries, resulting in physical, cognitive, psychological and emotional issues, according to a $17 million claim the family filed against the City of Palo Alto.
Hau told police he was driving at between 25 and 35 mph. The speed limit is 25 mph, Hendrickson said.
Hau's license was suspended in May 2009 for failure to pay a fine, and he was later convicted for driving with a suspended license in September 2009, Hendrickson said.
A toxicology analysis at the time of the November collision found that Hau had a trace amount of methamphetamine in his blood, according to the police report.
But such a trace amount of the drug is not believed to have impaired his driving or contributed to the accident, Hendrickson said. Hau did not exhibit signs of being under the influence and thus cannot be charged under Vehicle Code Section 23153, driving under the influence causing injury.
Similarly, Hau's actions did not constitute reckless driving under the law, she said.
"We could not find a single case where similar driving was found to be 'reckless.' The evidence here supports at most a finding that the driver violated two California vehicle codes: unsafe speed for the conditions, assuming the sun impaired the driver's vision and the safe speed was therefore 0 mph; and improper driving in a bike lane.
Although driving while being blinded by the sun at any speed is unsafe, Hendrickson pointed out that it is a common experience.
"People don't customarily stop in the middle of the road and slam on the brakes because the sun is in your eyes. ... Sometimes bad things happen, and they aren't addressed in the criminal courts," she said.
There is no evidence Hau was speeding. Cell phone records showed he placed calls only after the accident to alert relatives that he had been in an accident," she said.
In coming to its decision, the DA's office realized that not charging Hau in this case would be strongly at odds with public opinion, particularly since he had methamphetamine in his blood, Hendrickson said.
"In situations like this one where there is a disparity between public perception and the law, it can be tempting to file charges and let a jury decide. To do that in this instance would satisfy many people at least for the moment, and make the district attorney's office look strong. But to do so would be shirking our responsibility and our ethical obligation to prosecute cases only when we can say with integrity and belief that the law has been violated and that the only reasonable interpretation of all the evidence points to a defendant's guilt. We simply cannot do that in this instance," she said.
The DA's office has until Nov. 5 to file the suspended-license charge, after which the statute of limitations would kick in, she said. Out of courtesy to Lerrick's family, the DA is not immediately filing charges. Lerrick's father wants to look at options for redress regarding filing other charges. He could possibly get a state Attorney General's opinion regarding additional charges, but Hendrickson said it is unlikely the Attorney General's office would instruct any changes. Her office met with Lerrick's father on Wednesday, and he strongly disagrees with the DA's opinion, she said.
"They are dealing with a horrible tragedy," she said.
Lerrick's father could not be reached by press time. The family's claim against the City of Palo Alto alleges negligent design of the bike route on the road.
This story contains 931 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.