The board reached a consensus despite major reservations from supervisors Liz Kniss and Dave Cortese, who supported the bike bridge but wanted to provide about half of the funding that Stanford requested for its proposed network of campus-perimeter trails. After Kniss' proposal was rejected 3-2 (with Cortese supporting it), the board voted to entirely fund Stanford's $4.5 million request, which would enhance a 3.4-mile trail along Junipero Serra Boulevard, Stanford Avenue and El Camino Real.
Among the trail's features would be a new path on the block of Stanford Avenue between Raimundo Street and Junipero Serra. The Stanford Avenue block ends at the Stanford Dish, a popular hiking spot that attracts about half a million visits annually. The existing Stanford Avenue path, which stretches from El Camino Real to the Dish, ends at Raimundo, requiring visitors to the Dish to either walk on the road or cross the street to take the path on the south side. The proposal to modify Stanford Avenue would eliminate about 20 parking spaces on that block, according to the county's traffic engineers. Kniss argued that the county should hold a series of meetings before approving the potentially controversial modifications to the heavily used street. The board ultimately directed Stanford to conduct the necessary outreach before it receives the funds.
The $10.4 million was transferred to the county from Stanford as part of an agreement the university made in 2000. In exchange for being allowed to build up to 5 million square feet of development, the university agreed to compensate the community for the potential loss of recreational opportunities caused by the developments. Stanford was required to build two trails, one in Santa Clara County and another in San Mateo County. The latter was ultimately rejected by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors — a decision that remitted the $10.4 million in "recreation funds" back to Santa Clara County earlier this year.
When considering how to distribute the $10.4 million, the supervisors considered 15 projects from six agencies. Two of these agencies — Palo Alto and Stanford — came out as the clear winners, with the county funding most of the items on their collective wish list. There were a few exceptions. Palo Alto had hoped to get some funding for bicycle improvements, including "sharrows" (road marking reminding drivers to share the road with cyclists) and other traffic-calming features, on Park Boulevard. It also hoped the county would help fund improvements to the Arastradero Road trail. The county had determined that neither of these projects meet the criteria for the funds because they would merely upgrade existing facilities, not create new ones.
The board also rejected bids from Menlo Park, Los Altos Hills, Portola Valley and the open space district, most of whom proposed improvements to open space.
The Tuesday vote was a huge boost for Palo Alto's bid to build a new pedestrian and bike bridge over U.S. Highway 101 at Adobe Creek. The bike project, the most ambitious and expensive component in the city's recently approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, aims to provide a new path to the Baylands in the south part of the city.
The new Matadero Creek trail in Palo Alto — a 1.3-mile, east-west path that would cut through the center of the city and link to Stanford through Park Boulevard — will follow Matadero Creek from Alma Street to West Bayshore Road.
Palo Alto City Councilman Sid Espinosa was one of many city residents who urged the board to support the Matadero project, along with others in the city's joint application with Stanford.
"This proposal would greatly expand the recreational opportunities to Stanford residents and campus users and Palo Alto residents as a whole," Espinosa said.
He also said that the city is committed to seeking other funding sources and spending its own money to supplement the county's contributions.
The bike bridge could cost up to $10 million, though Chief Transportation Official Jaime Rodriguez said the city is now in the midst of preliminary design work and should have a better idea of the price tag within six months.
Rodriguez also praised Stanford's trail proposal and called the Stanford Avenue trail "the single most important element of the trail program because of its nexus to Stanford residents."
Stanford officials and campus residents asserted that the projects would create a pristine trail network for area cyclists and employees while, at the same time, greatly enhancing recreational opportunities for the university's population. James Sweeney, president of the Stanford Campus Residential Leaseholders — an elected board representing the campus population — urged the board to support the perimeter-trail proposal.
"The Stanford perimeter trail will give opportunities to people of all ages — and I want to emphasize all ages — for adequate recreation suitable to their physical capabilities," Sweeney said, noting that campus residents include seniors and parents with children.
"It's part of an integrated set of trails in which the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, so I urge you to support the whole Stanford-Palo Alto proposal," Sweeney said.
Penny Ellson, a leading advocate for bike improvements along Palo Alto's routes to schools, said the proposals from Stanford and Palo Alto would greatly enhance commuters' abilities to shift from cars to other means of transportation.
The Palo Alto Unified School District also voted to back the city's and Stanford's proposal. Dana Tom, vice president of the school board, urged the supervisors to support the application.
The biggest disagreement on the board was over the Dumbarton Link in the Ravenswood Open Space Preserve. Kniss said the proposed Ravenswood trail would provide recreational opportunities for East Palo Alto, a city that she said currently has a shortage of parks.
"This would considerably add to that community's ability to have more access, especially to the environment along the bay," Kniss said.
She and Cortese both supported giving the project $2 million. It would have built the last 0.6-mile segment in the South Bay portion of the San Francisco Bay Trail, connecting Redwood City to Alviso. When their proposal failed, they grudgingly voted along with the board majority to give the project $400,000.
"It's all good, but it's a classic case of 'the rich get richer and the poor stay where they're at,'" Cortese said.
Kniss, who is about to conclude her term on the board and return to her former position on the Palo Alto City Council, agreed and said it's "very regrettable that we didn't fund more of the Bay Trail connection."
Supporters of funding Stanford's entire perimeter-trails proposal said they were swayed by the fact that the university had agreed to designate the existing trails for public use.
The list of projects that the board ultimately approved was proposed by Supervisor Ken Yeager and immediately endorsed by board President George Shirakawa. Supervisor Mike Wasserman was the swing vote, while Kniss and Cortese voted along with their colleagues when it became clear the Yeager proposal would pass.
This story contains 1264 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.