As Palo Alto Online reported Friday, the joint grant application requests funds for five projects — $4 million for the proposed bike bridge at Adobe Creek; $4.5 million for new trails between El Camino Real and the Stanford Dish and along Junipero Serra; $200,000 to create the city's second "bike boulevard" on Park Boulevard; $1.5 million for a new bike-and-pedestrian trail along Matadero Creek, which would link Bryant Street and Greer Road; and $200,000 to enhance a trail along Arastradero Road, between Foothill Expressway and Purissima Road in Los Altos Hills.
The proposal was quickly put together by city staff and Stanford officials after initial disagreements about how the funds should be spent. City planners acknowledged Tuesday that they have much work to do when it comes to public outreach. But given the tight deadline — the application was due Thursday — they urged the council to support the ambitious proposal. Two of the projects in the proposal — the bike bridge at Adobe Creek and the "bike boulevard" on Park — are key components of the city's recently adopted Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, a document that aims to transform Palo Alto into one of the nation's premier biking destinations.
"We think this is a great opportunity for the city to hopefully kick-start our newly adopted Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Plan and to really significantly fund two of our major priorities," Planning Director Curtis Williams said Tuesday.
The council agreed and voted 6-0, with Councilman Sid Espinosa absent and Mayor Yiaway Yeh and Councilman Larry Klein recusing themselves, to support the application.
"I think that this is a strong grant application," Councilwoman Nancy Shepherd said. "I think it really is a great opportunity for Palo Alto to solidify our determination to get our bicycle paths built."
Her colleagues shared her sentiments. Vice Mayor Greg Scharff said he's very pleased that Stanford and Palo Alto were able to form a partnership. Councilwoman Gail Price agreed.
"I think, at the end of the day, a strong partnership among all the parties is very, very important and I think that we can each, in our own way, achieve outcomes that we jointly will be able to enjoy," Price said.
The joint proposal also earned plaudits from another important stakeholder group — Stanford campus residents. Allyn Taylor, vice president of the Stanford Campus Residential Leaseholders, said her group (which is elected to represent the campus community) fully backs the joint application. The homeowners, she said, "are thrilled to be working with Palo Alto" on the grant proposal.
"Stanford homeowners are very much in support of this program that's been outlined to you today," Taylor told the council.
The campus residents hadn't always seen eye to eye with the city on the recreation funds. When Santa Clara County Supervisor Liz Kniss proposed in May to use the Stanford funds to pay for Palo Alto's bike bridge and to spend another $3 million extending the Dumbarton section of the Bay Trail, campus residents protested that the two projects are too distant from the campus. They asked the Board of Supervisors to delay its vote and to consider other projects, including the campus residents' proposal to extend trails around the Dish.
University officials concurred that the process was moving too fast and also asked the county supervisors to set up a more deliberative process for evaluating various grant requests. The Board of Supervisors agreed and is now scheduled to hold a public hearing on the grant proposals on Oct. 9.
The county issued its request for proposals in August, said Jaime Rodriguez, Palo Alto's chief transportation official. This left the city and Stanford with less than a month to put together a grant application.
The new plan differs markedly from the one Kniss pitched in May. The new grant proposal includes a wider range of bike projects than the previous one. It also includes the network of trails by the Dish for which Stanford campus residents have long lobbied. It does not, however, ask for any funds for the 27-mile Dumbarton section in the San Francisco Bay Trail, which would connect Redwood City and Alviso.
Williams said the city decided not to pursue the Dumbarton link because that project would lie in San Mateo County, well outside the city's jurisdiction.
"The application needs to come from the sponsoring agency, and we're not that for the Bay Trail," Williams said. "It's not a project that we would sponsor and build."
Even so, the Bay Trail project could compete with the ones proposed by Palo Alto and Stanford. Adina Levin, a member of the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, said the Midpeninsula Open Space District plans to submit its own application for that plan. The project, she said, would add value to the Palo Alto sections of the Bay Trail by making it possible for people to get from the city to San Mateo and Alameda counties.
But council members agreed that the city would have a better shot at getting county funds with the proposal offered by staff and Stanford. Rodriguez noted that the Dumbarton trail is located too far from the other elements in the proposal. The ones included, on the other hand, all link together in one cohesive network. The argument proved convincing to the council.
"I think the most important thing is putting our best foot forward and making our application as strong as we can make it," Scharff said. "The most important thing is to secure the funds to make this a reality."
So far, the Dumbarton trail link and the bike bridge are the only two projects that have been evaluated by the county's legal staff and deemed acceptable under the criteria of the General Use Permit, Kniss told the Weekly Thursday. It remains to be seen, she said, whether all the projects in the joint Palo Alto and Stanford application will likewise qualify under the conditions of the general-use permit.
"When all applications are in, staff will take a look and decide whether or not they will qualify," Kniss said.
This story contains 1155 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.