Editorial: New massage rules still not right | April 13, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |


http://paloaltoonline.com/print/story/print/2012/04/13/editorial-new-massage-rules-still-not-right


Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - April 13, 2012

Editorial: New massage rules still not right

Skeptical council members continue to question need for client logs and increased regulation

In what is becoming almost an amusing struggle between city staff and the City Council, how Palo Alto regulates massage therapists once again occupied the time and attention this week of the four-member Council Policy and Procedures Committee, police and city administrators and a city attorney.

This story contains 676 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments

Posted by Kate, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 15, 2012 at 9:23 am

The Weekly says "City management missed their chance to demonstrate that on this one." Presumably, the newspaper meant 'common sense'. Is anyone surprised? So what else is new?


Posted by how serious?, a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:44 am

What were those 10 complaints the police logged?


Posted by registered user, Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:18 pm

How about them barbers, and Dental Hygienists, and shoe shine boys. It is way past time to revert Palo Alto to a Municipal Service District.