Editorial: Renewable energy bill a big win for Simitian, state | April 15, 2011 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |


Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - April 15, 2011

Editorial: Renewable energy bill a big win for Simitian, state

Governor signs legislation that will create jobs, boost Valley's economy

Long a devout and successful proponent of alternative energy, Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, hit the jackpot this week when Gov. Jerry Brown signed his Senate Bill 2X, which requires private and public utilities to obtain 33 percent of their electricity from renewable energy sources in nine years, by 2020.

This story contains 371 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Posted by registered user, Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Apr 16, 2011 at 5:36 am

Why not 100% renewables?

Posted by hate it, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Apr 16, 2011 at 5:48 am

Can't wait for the screaming about how much more our energy will cost..as usual affecting the poor and middle class more than the rich..

Or is the next logical step to tax the rich more to subsidize the poor ? ( Leaving the middle class out to dry as usual)???

Stupid law, as usual.

Posted by fireman aj, a resident of another community
on Apr 18, 2011 at 10:06 pm

Stupid laws and special interest butt kissing is what Joe does best.

Posted by al norte sm, a resident of another community
on Apr 20, 2011 at 9:52 am

hate it:
"Or is the next logical step to tax the rich more to subsidize the poor ? ( Leaving the middle class out to dry as usual)???"

How does that leave the middle class out to dry?

A progressive tax code has been (mostly) America's way for years, and is highly supported by the public.

Two out of three Americans support closing the deficit by raising taxes incrementally on those making over 250k a year.

Posted by hate it, a resident of Greenmeadow
on May 1, 2011 at 10:29 am

Well, to answer your question Al Norte:

The "rich", however it is defined du jour, lately at $115,000/year given that is when someone hits the "top 10%" of this nation, pay the lion's share of taxes, have no assistance for anything from anyone and work their whole lives to do this.

The "middle class" who pay the rest of the taxes, given that the "bottom" 47% pays zero in taxes, work hard all their lives and get no help from anyone because they aren't "poor".

When energy prices go up..who will pay them? The "rich" will pay their own and the majority of taxes.

The "middle class" will pay the same rates, and their taxes.

The "poor" will get subsidized by the "rich" and the "middle class" taxes and pay little to none of the costs.

Who feels it the most?

The Middle Class, as usual. That is what I mean by leaving the middle class out to dry.

This is how socialist and marxist countries end up with no middle class, only a few "rich" and a whole bunch of "poor" as the middle class either give up and relax a bit, or get lucky/through hard work and risk get "rich".

I feel the urge myself already when I look at how hard I work, how much I pay, and the very, very small difference between the quality of my life and the quality of those who live in subsidized housing in palo alto, working very little compared to what I am doing.

There was a time when I believed that hard work would pay off, but after the last few years, and seeing where this country is heading, led by leftists like Simitian, I am beginning to think it simply isn't worth it.

After all, if 2/3rds of Americans REALLY believe it is morally acceptable to steal money (not by gun, but by IRS) from others who make more than they do just because they want to, what kind of moral code can I count on in this country, and why should I keep risking my time and money to create a business, only to have my profits stolen if and when I FINALLY make it?

And that is the problem with "taking other people's money", as Thatcher put it so well..eventually you run out of it. By then, you have destroyed your country.