Espinosa pledges openness, urges civic involvement | January 28, 2011 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - January 28, 2011

Espinosa pledges openness, urges civic involvement

Mayor celebrates city's accomplishments, lays out plans for 2011 in his State of the City address

by Gennady Sheyner

Palo Alto has much to cheer about in 2011, but challenges that dominated the city's attention last year will remain front and center, Mayor Sid Espinosa told the crowd during his State of the City speech Monday night.

This story contains 738 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Posted by Scott, a resident of Southgate
on Jan 25, 2011 at 7:04 am

Mayor Espinosa, speaking to an overflow audience of nearly 300, was inclusive and hit good notes.

Among the things that impressed me favorably:

1. The mayor seems to have real ideas of how to energize more citizens of all ages and financial means for community service. There are ample opportunities from non-profits to boards and commissions to preparedness and Project Safety Net.

2. City staff seems committed and enthusiastic. Virtually all the leadership and dozens more were in the audience, none in union T-shirts. A cooperative spirit will be important in times ahead.

3. The infrastructure backlog is being attacked like many other Palo Alto challenges, develop thoughtful plans, then work them.

4. Transparency and inclusiveness will be enhanced with new ways for citizens to communicate with the city, and get prompt feedback. The mayor and participating council members will be available at least weekly at various locations around town other than City Hall.

Dozens of city leaders were there including Gary Fazzino and Jim Baer who each overcame health set-backs last year. All in all, an excellent start on the Palo Alto challenges ahead.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Jan 25, 2011 at 9:22 am

Another year, another mayor and another "more of the same speech". I would like to see our elected councilmembers actually deal with the important issues facing the city--the infrastructure repair backlog, the Stanford hospital remodel, the fate of Alma and Edgewood Plaza etc.
How many mayors will bring up this "civic engagement" issue? Maybe there is too much civic engagement in the city--that may explain nothing ever gets resolved.
And wasn't emergency preparedness the goal of Judy Kleinberg when she was mayor? At least we did not hear much about our "green" agenda.

Posted by You-Get-What-You-Pay-For, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 25, 2011 at 10:39 am

> "The way in which people receive and process information are
> fundamentally changing around the world

So .. did Mayor Espinosa insist that this meeting be streamed live on the Internet? Will it be uploaded to Youtube? If "da Mayor" really believed his own words, he would have made certain that his address to the residents of Palo Alto would have been available through the ubiquitous Internet, both live, and on-demand. Additionally, DVDs of his address should be on-file in the library.

Espinosa talks about "transparency", by holding office hours and "traveling around the community". Has he never heard of e-mail? And with the advent of video-phone services, why would anyone want to drive/walk/hop/skateboard downtown to his "office" when they could have a face-2-face with him on their laptops, or smartphones? Guess Espinoza is good with sound-bytes, but not much with what they mean?

The Mayor talked about people calling in pothole locations and other maintenance issues through their mobile phones. Presumably he was talking about an APP for smartphones, but people can do that now--by calling the Field Services number that is staffed 7/24, and ask them to forward the message to public works. It would help if there were a general purpose number with a menu that would allow people to get to a number of infrastructure services, but maybe that's what Espinosa is talking about. (It might be interesting to ask him if he has ever called in a pothole, or a darkened street light?)

This might be a good "4th of July" speech, but what good is it to address the issues of the city for the coming years? All-in-all, another of a long line of "mayors" that is long on "form", and short on "substance".

Posted by Ronna Devincenzi, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 25, 2011 at 11:26 am

RE: "We want you to be engaged."

After having been engaged in Palo Alto for 20 years, I would caution citizens to be leary of "civic engagement" now, for two reasons:

1) no one on City Council, or in City Hall, could define what it is.
2) when you are engaged in Palo Alto, it puts YOU personally, as a volunteer, in an ideal position to be blamed for the city's lack of transparency, public accountability, and basic common sense; justice will not be served, or truth told, due to politics and elbow-rubbing.

Bottom line: a volunteer is an ideal scapegoat, for an overall leaderless city government. Even internal "Executive Summaries" of situations gone bad will prove disappointing & amusing fiction.

I think Sid means well. But one man does not make a well-run city.
Palo Alto needs a complete overhaul, and from the top, down. Perhaps then, civic engagement might work.

But until then, ask what the city will do for you, because citizens pay through the teeth for it, not what you will do for the city.

Posted by Its not a remodel, a resident of Evergreen Park
on Jan 25, 2011 at 11:41 am

When svatoid refers to Stanford's 3.5 BILLION dollar demolition and construction plan as a "remodel" you know he's writing propaganda and public relations.
The developers themselves now call it a "renewal." Cute!
Yes BILLIONS of dollars and it's just a remodel, you know, just like installing a new sink in the kitchen.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 25, 2011 at 11:46 am

"When svatoid refers to Stanford's 3.5 BILLION dollar demolition and construction plan as a "remodel" you know he's writing propaganda and public relations."

Call my comments what you want, Its not a remodel, my point is that it is an issue that has been on the council table for years and needs to be dealt with.Support or opposition of this matter is a topic for another thread.

Posted by Thank you, Mayor., a resident of Greenmeadow
on Jan 25, 2011 at 11:50 am

Mr. Espinoza just stepped into the Mayor's role. Give him a chance to do the job. If you think you can do better, run for office.

I thought he gave a fine speech last night. Mayor Espinoza is strategically focused and extraordinarily productive leader. He has demonstrated this in many other roles. He are lucky to have him.

I'm grateful he has volunteered to take on this mantle of huge responsibility for our community. Many thanks to Mayor Espinoza, Council, and staff. This will be another challenging year, but I know you will do your best to guide us through the challenges in front of us.

Posted by anon, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 25, 2011 at 12:39 pm

You-get-what-you-pay-for, Sorry to make you sound like a fool but the address was streamed live on the internet, it is available on-demand, and can be watched at the library. Having office does not mean one can not have a video conference call. An app for reporting potholes would mean I don't have to use my minutes to place a call.

I think before you spout rhetoric about a person and a situation you clearly have no information what-so-ever on, you should consider how you are discrediting no one but yourself.

I disagree with Ronna's stance on the issues, but at least she speaks with actual knowledge and isn't spewing non-sense.

Posted by You-Get-What-You-Pay-For, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 25, 2011 at 2:33 pm

> Sorry to make you sound like a fool but
> the address was streamed live on the internet,

> it is available on-demand,

Going to the City's web site, there is no evidence that the session was streamed. The City has failed to develop its own digital technology capability, so this is outsource to the Media Center. In the past there have been links to the page on the Media Center's web site where the video stream could be found. This is not present (today). Moreover, there does not seem to be any video-on-demand of last night's session that is obvious on the Media Center's web-pages.

This brings up a bigger issue--which is the failure of the City to embrace video technology, making these sorts of recordings official documents, and giving them protection under the City's records disposition/retention policy. The City does not see videos as official, at the moment. Nor does the Media Center. It has no obligation to keep these files beyond a contracted period of time (if in fact such a period of time has been agreed to by the Media Center). It also has no obligation to produce these videos under a public information request. (They will sell them, however.)

> and can be watched at the library.

The point being made was that the City should create DVDs and the library should enter them into its catalog. That currently is not happening. And if the files are not available on the Media Center's web-site, no one can watch them .. be they in the library, or at home.
Many, many, people have noted that Palo Alto has no "institutional history". One of the reasons is that the records of City business are hard to come by, and few have been digitized, and indexed, for access from the Internet.

> Having office does not mean one can not have a video
> conference call.

Again true. But given that Espinosa has worked for two of the world's technology giants, and he said: "we need to evolve" .. this was a good time to make this sort of suggestion. (Who wants to put money on whether he is using a video app by the end of his term?)

> An app for reporting potholes would mean I don't have
> to use my minutes to place a call.

If the app is on a 3G smartphone, somebody's minutes are going to be used. If not your's, then whose? As someone who has called in many requests for pothole repair, and for out-of-service street lights, I can attest that it takes about 1-2 minutes to call the Field Services representative, tell him/her your location, and any details that might help the service crews understand the problem, and say: "goodbye". Anyone who is so stingy as not wanting to donate a couple of his/her precious cell phone minutes .. well, then they deserve streets with potholes and no street lights.

Call me a fool if you want, but your points don't hold much water.

Posted by anon, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 25, 2011 at 5:17 pm

Mayor's video on media center: Web Link

Mayor's video linked from the city website: Web Link

Video cannot be permanent record as the storage medium changes regularly. Records must be kept on actual phyical paper. Not the city's choice - but their duty. Electronic copies of all meeting agendas and minutes, all ordinances and resolutions are available at the city website - where it will be kept inperpetuity, and is thus a permanent record if you wish. But the legal permanent records are kept on paper - a medium that does not change (and yes it is preserved properly and protected from natural disaster).

I'm not sure about the library making a dvd available, what's the point? That's outdated tech. Why? The library is not the keeper of records, that function resides in city hall. The libraries have access to all the information - why does it have to be on that specific format?

Are you willing to donate video conferencing equipment to the City? Because for every one person saying they should do that, ten people will complain if they spend the money on it. They can have phone conferences which should suffice for anyone too lazy to get to city hall.

What's your point about the app for a phone? As the customer I don't want to spend my money placing a call for a pot hole. An app would not spend my money. This is not a difficult equation - it's cutomer service. It takes a real piece of work to complain about easy wins like this one.

Posted by oy!, a resident of Palo Alto Orchards
on Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 pm

Continued overuse of consultants, senior management incompetence, perks and benefits to a city manager who continues deficit budgets, city council members who forgot they are supposed to represent taxpayers, monthly city hall scandals, .... Wake up Sid!