Residents catch city wasting water | August 8, 2014 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - August 8, 2014

Residents catch city wasting water

Photographs, calls indicate City of Palo Alto needs to heed its own water restrictions

by Sue Dremann

One day after the City of Palo Alto adopted water-use restrictions for businesses and residents, mushrooms growing in city planter boxes and water cascading onto sidewalks and streets indicate the city will also need to correct its own water waste.

This story contains 1108 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Staff Writer Sue Dremann can be emailed at


Posted by Mike, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 8, 2014 at 8:57 am

I know their is extensive use of non-potable water for irrigation purposes throughout the city. How is someone supposed to know whether the water is potable or not?

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 8, 2014 at 9:07 am

How about the city putting some pressure on the powers that be to demand California build a desalination plant. The cost is moot, water should be charged above a certain level so that consumers can choose how much water they use by cost rather than any other criteria.

It is abysmal to think that a coastal state has never used the water along the coast to alleviate droughts.

Posted by Wayne Martin, a resident of Fairmeadow
on Aug 8, 2014 at 9:50 am

According to the City's Water Quality Plant web-page, about 7 billion gallons of treated water is discharged into the bay. While this water is not potable, it can be used to water grass, and wash sidewalks.

The City is using a significant amount of recycled water on the golf course, but the amount of recycled water used else where by the City is less clear.

The high volume of water output by the recycled plant calls into question what it would cost to upgrade the facility so that potable water is output by the plant?

Posted by Ronald, a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 8, 2014 at 9:59 am

Are basements under construction regulated for water waste? Many new homes are tapping into the aquifer and sending water down storm drains for weeks or months 24/7.

Posted by My lawn is dead, a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:04 am

Those businesses on Page Mill have sprawling green, fluffy lawns so you know they are watering daily. It's beautiful, but shouldn't the city force them to stop watering?

Posted by Concerned, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:13 am

I also noticed that grass was planted in the new Oregon Expressway median and spray heads water this grass. Why doesn't the city replace the grass with drought tolerant plants and a drip irrigation system?

Posted by Desalination only for irrigation, a resident of Jordan Middle School
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:41 am

I don't know if anyone has ever tasted desalinated water... not pleasant by any stretch. If the state does do this, it would be great for irrigation, not drinking. For anyone who has ever had to drink the terrible liquid for medical purposes, that is what desalinated water tastes like.

Remember brown is the new green these days. Let the lawn go so we have clean water to drink.

Posted by Gethin, a resident of Midtown
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:42 am

Gethin is a registered user.

Seale Park around 10 pm - the spray heads are incorrectly set and water is pouring down the gutters. They are probably wasting more water in one day than I use on my two gardens in a month, before I turned them off that is.

Posted by Cheryl Lilienstein, a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:45 am

Frequently, watering the playing fields at Gunn High School produces a rush of water in Barron Creek.

I thought the plan for those fields was astroturf. What happened to that?

Posted by Sparty, a resident of another community
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:48 am

Sparty is a registered user.

Easy way to save water== Don't eat out.

of course this would have to be at the level of putting some places out of business. And the places that are not fast food are going to be the biggest users of water

Posted by Midtown, a resident of Midtown
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:56 am

Until 100% of basement dewatering water is recycled it should be banned. ALL 6 million gallons of it.

Posted by another person, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:12 am

Why do we have to call each other in? Doesn't this sound a little Big Brother or reminiscent of our last world war?? How about the idea of rates increasing if you use more than a certain amount... a very substantial hike might stop people from wasting! If not, and people are willing to over water and spend lots of money, use that money for the upgrades to our city watering systems, desalination plants and other infrastructural needs.

personally, I think it's despicable that we've got to the point of tattle tailing on each other. Next we'll be calling in about a light bulb on for too long.

Posted by common sense, a resident of Atherton
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:19 am

another person---thanks so much for your post! I agree 100%!

Posted by dave, a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:32 am

Desal takes a lot of energy input, and unless that is solar or wind, the energy used for desal contributes to climate change, which quite arguably is a contributing factor to the current drought. There ain't no free lunch. reduce. reuse. recycle. now more than ever.

Posted by Sparty, a resident of another community
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:36 am

Sparty is a registered user.

"Why do we have to call each other in? Doesn't this sound a little Big Brother or reminiscent of our last world war?? How about the idea of rates increasing if you use more than a certain amount... a very substantial hike might stop people from wasting! "

This would unfairly target minorities who are statistically have larger families--not just children but extended families living in the same home.

[Portion removed.]

Posted by Jomad, a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:36 am

Who is hiring these bright landscapers and urban planners that are planting these thirsty grasses and bushes along our roadways??? Use native plants and grasses. We are all going to did of thirst, but at least we will have lush green grass.

City of Palo Alto hires some serious nitwits, especially considering their reputation for being such an intelligent and progressive town.

Posted by Lynne, a resident of Professorville
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:37 am

I have just been walking outside and came across guinda and channing there is a church that is completely wasting water who do we put people into as the water is running onto the concrete and down the drain.......

Posted by Midtown Resident, a resident of Midtown
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:41 am

I am a little confused about this article. If the City staff are proposing a series of fines and citations for watering offenses, are they planning on citing and fining themselves, considering the list of violations posted in this article? And if they are considering exceptions to the fountain bans for aesthetic purposes, aren't all fountains for aesthetic purposes? Or are these water regulations only to enable people to snitch on each other but not for the City? Seems to me this creates a pretty poisonous atmosphere for Palo Alto.

Posted by Jenny, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:58 am

It is my understanding that most of the water used for watering parks, medians and landscaping in Palo Alto is recycled water.

Desalinization is a hugely expensive way of providing water. Re-cycling waste water is much cheaper. In the 1980s my husband was involved in the technology to re-cycle water. Unfortunately, the public rejected recycled water and the first plant that was ever built for this purpose sent all its water down a hillside in the Sierras.

If humans will not accept recycled water for drinking, it can be used for landscaping on private property. However, this would require a whole different set of infrastructure and another set piping would need to be built throughout the City.

Posted by Julian, a resident of Midtown
on Aug 8, 2014 at 12:05 pm

@Jomad: first sensible comment in this whole thread. Unfortunately, as with pretty much all civic subjects in Palo Alto, it goes back to getting rid of the idiots downtown.

@Midtown Resident: You're kidding, right?! Public employees holding themselves accountable to public rules?! That's today's laugh, thanks! As Orwell put it: Some animals are more equal than others.

Posted by Lorraine, a resident of Portola Valley
on Aug 8, 2014 at 12:17 pm

I don't think we should be pumping ground water out for basement construction. It's more than water wasteful, we are going to have major subsidence from removing the aquifers. Soon all of Eastern Palo Alto will be below sea level!

Posted by citizen, a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 pm

I agree with Ronald. Basement construction has been a shameful waste of water.

Saving it for street sweepers?! Sounds like a bogus feel-good response.
A drop out of the bucket, so to speak.
I've watched so many basements go in... A strong stream of water tends to run down
the sewer 24/7 for months while they build.

How big a water tank are they gonna build to store all this dewatered water?

Posted by Hermia, a resident of Triple El
on Aug 8, 2014 at 12:59 pm

It makes sense to me that fountains in public areas and grass at the parks be left till pretty late in the scheme of things to restrict. Those are providing benefit to the whole community, or at least as many as desire it. I'd rather have the city use the water that would fuel ten private fountains to make a fountain available to hundreds or thousands than start by cutting them off but keeping our individual aesthetic islands going.

Start with waste, in all its many manifestations. Plan for less use by planting for climate.
But a few soft public spaces that serve the whole community is not the place to *start*, even if eventually they have to go too.

Posted by Old Codger, a resident of Professorville
on Aug 8, 2014 at 1:30 pm

Well for the record, my little lawn is toasty brown and I am thinking of replacing it, but if I did want to irrigate it two days a week, the new city restrictions are clueless and confusing. Even numbered addresses can water on Tuesday and Saturday and odd numbered addresses can water on Wednesday and Sunday, between the hours of 7pm and 7am. Suppose I have an even numbered address and I want to water on Tuesday. Does that mean I can water from 7pm Tuesday night to 7am Wednesday morning or does it mean I can water from midnight Monday night to 7am Tuesday morning and 7pm Tuesday night to midnight Tuesday night? Not clear! The second interpretation may be the most accurate, but that would mean I could water 4 times a week, which I don't think was the intent. Come on Palo Alto, we can do better than this!

Posted by anonymous, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 8, 2014 at 1:52 pm

I agree with Hermia's post. There are valid examples of unnecessary water waste all over, public and private, and these should be fixed.
I don't agree with tattling on others.
From the article it sounded like the city is pretty slow to correct situations that they have been alerted to about CITY water waste - like water running down the street from city park overwatering. Meantime, I do NOT want to destroy my valuable landscaping that I have worked very hard on and that adds beauty to my neighborhood and city. I do NOT want everyone else to destroy theirs, to let city parks go dry and brown and be fire hazards and to have an ugly city. Of course, new landscaping (whether commercial or residential) should be sensitive/aware to the challenges we have periodically with water availability. I have lived here a couple of time periods with flooding and excessive rainfall. How about planning ahead to capture some of that, advise us on installing rain barrels, making info available so we can plan for that properly.
I disagree with neighbors tattling on neighbors, as they may be unaware of watering practices. (I don't mean water running down the street, that should be phoned it, I meant someone believing that a neighbor is watering "too often" by that person's judgement). I refuse to water in the middle of the night, it is noisy and leads to disease in many plants as well as snails and slugs. Yes, one should water early AM, fine.
Also, how about that fact that while I take good care of my landscaping, and do not waste water, but wish to have an attractive garden, I take OTHER steps to conserve water in other areas of my life???
Example: I had a neighbor with the PA sign" PA Green" on their front yard, all the while this person would hand wash with hose/running water his luxury vehicle. Ironic, isn't it.

Posted by Quercus, a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 8, 2014 at 1:56 pm

I don't think there is much use of non-potable water for irrigation in Palo Alto except for Greer park and the golf course:
Web Link

"In the Palo Alto Region, recycled water is used for irrigation of parks and golf courses and habitat restoration. Recycled water is used for landscape irrigation at Palo Alto Golf Course, Shoreline Golf Course and Greer Park. In 1993, the Emily Renzel Marsh was formed, which is a freshwater marsh filled with recycled water."

Posted by anonymous, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 8, 2014 at 1:57 pm

Not to lay it on too thick, but what I meant is that unless someone like Big Brother were to do a comprehensive analysis of our individual lives, it is unclear how much we are wasting water. Just looking at someone's garden is not a full or valid analysis of that, UNLESS there is a violation NOW such as water running down the street, into the gutter. I think it's amusing some pat themselves on the back for having lower water bills because they are not showering at home...they shower at the gym! As if that made a difference in the long run. I haven't paid for gym membership and so shower at home, and I should be reprimanded because my water bill is higher?!

Posted by anonymous, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 8, 2014 at 2:00 pm

Near my residence, Duveneck Elementary School is completing a long-running major construction and remodeling project. I understand they will have a new field (sod or seed?) which will be watered and I thought not even available to the children until sometime in October. I think elementary schools SHOULD have fields, yes use good practices, but with a brand-new field I assume the grass will have to be babied and heavily watered, should be stop that??? I think not. Let's all be reasonable and fix egregious problems such as shown in the initial article but not take away children's schools' natural grass.

Posted by anciana, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 8, 2014 at 3:18 pm

During the last really bad drought, I let all of my side landscaping on one side of the house, except for a large camellia, go dry, and since it isn't visible from the street, it is not an eyesore to anyone but me.

For this drought, I have let my back yard lawn go. There it sits, brown, brown, brown. Inside the house, I save all the water in the kitchen and shower while waiting for it to change to hot or to cold. This usually gives me enough water, for watering my patio pots. I never let the water run while I am brushing my teeth. little things make a difference.

In both the front and the back, I have some gorgeous 50-year-old rhododendrons which I planted, and I'm not going to let them go dry. Period. I have a rain barrel, I do everything else that I possible can, but there are some limits. I do hand water most areas in front of my house, which has a variety of plants, but no lawn, for the pleasure of myself, my friends and my neighbors.

I'm waiting, and hoping, and waiting, for a wet winter. May that happen!

Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 8, 2014 at 4:16 pm

To those criticizing PA for the plantings in the new Oregon Expressway medians...please redirect your anger at the County of Santa Clara. OrEx is a county road...PA has no control and no responsibilities on this project.

Posted by HUTCH 7.62, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 8, 2014 at 5:14 pm

Not to long ago most of South Palo Alto was on wells. In fact the city still owns several wells. There is one next to peers park. During the last major drought the city often used these wells.

Posted by Catherine Elvert, a resident of another community
on Aug 8, 2014 at 9:40 pm

I normally do not reply to online blogs like this, but I thought it would be good to address a few questions and clear up some inaccuracies. - Catherine Elvert, Communications Manager for the City of Palo Alto Utilities

To Mike, non-potable water (i.e. water that has been used at least once, is untreated, or has been used but not treated to drinking water standards) such as recycled water, rainwater or graywater needs to be marked with a sign labeling it as unpotable. Identification is supposed to include the indistinguishable lavender color for signage and piping such as irrigation lines. The City will use recycled water for irrigation or other non-potable purposes in areas where it is available. We has a Recycled Water Master Plan for expansion of the distribution system. With your continued support, hopefully we can continue to progress on this capital improvement project, which also serves as a sustainable, drought-proof water supply for a semi-arid Palo Alto city.

To Midtown Resident (and others), these new restrictions apply to City facilities and parks. Our staff is working hard around the clock to upgrade, replace or otherwise tune and fix irrigation systems to ensure highest efficiency of water use. Please continue to let us know when you see problems. We can't be everywhere all the time, so we appreciate your eyes and ears on the street. Thank you for your diligence in helping us keep care of these areas.

We try to encourage all businesses and residents to landscape appropriately with plants that are suited for use at a particular site and work well with our natural environment. There are times when turf grass is appropriate and we encourage all to work hard to ensure that irrigation water is applied as efficiently as possible. In areas where turf grass is not appropriate, we encourage people to consider replacing it with native, low water use plants. We'll pay you to do it! Right now, turf grass rebates are the highest they've ever been and the highest in the world! We also pay rebates for upgrading or replacing irrigation hardware to modern, efficient hardware.

Please take advantage of these resources and/or let your friends and neighbors know about them! All information on water supply conditions, usage restrictions and important resources can be found at

Thank you to all for helping us do everything to help stretch our water supplies. Every individual makes a difference. You all have impacts on your family and friends. Let's spread the word and take care of this precious resource.

-Catherine Elvert, Communications Manager, City of Palo Alto Utilities

Posted by Early morning walker, a resident of Ventura
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:06 pm

Thanks, Catherine, Elvert, for your thoughtful response. Time for all of us to replace those lawns.

Fyi, seems like Mitchell Park is getting overwatered. At 6:30 AM this Thursday, there were some big wet muddy patches. Possible to cut back on the watering?

Posted by Daddy'O, a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:12 pm

The maintenance of the median on Oregon Expressway is the responsibility of The City Of Palo Alto. The contractors have installed "top soil" from Stevens Creek Reservoir Quarry. This is not top-soil, just clay that is ground up. After one year this product will turn into a cement like product not suitable for plantlike material. Trust me, I learned the hard way about this product.
So please, stick with what you know.

As my neighbor has always said about Palo Alto residents; Over educated under intelligent.

Posted by HUTCH 7.62, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 8, 2014 at 11:43 pm

"As my neighbor has always said about Palo Alto residents; Over educated under intelligent."

LMAO well that just about sum's it up.

Posted by musical, a resident of Palo Verde
on Aug 9, 2014 at 3:54 am

I got a kick out of that one too.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields