Around Town | October 25, 2013 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - October 25, 2013

Around Town

SIGNS OF THE TIMES ... With just days left until the big vote, the two sides in Palo Alto's bitter Measure D debate are now swapping a familiar Election Day accusation: stolen lawn signs. Cheryl Lilienstein, one of the leaders of the campaign opposing the measure, publicly leveled a series of accusations this week against the "Yes on D" camp. In an email to the City Council, the Palo Alto Housing Corporation (whose residential project on Maybell Avenue is the subject of Measure D) and the Police Department, Lilienstein said she received four separate complaints of "Vote Against D" yard signs being stolen last weekend on Maybell. "Please exercise your wisdom and authority as leaders and request that your volunteers calm down," Lilienstein wrote. She received a response within three hours from Councilwoman Gail Price, who like Lilienstein lives in Barron Park but who unlike her supports the measure. Sign stealing, she noted, is not limited to the measure's proponents. "I had two signs stolen from my front yard on Maybell — as one example," Price wrote. Another victim of sign thievery was Candice Gonzalez, executive director of the Housing Corporation. "Please note that many Yes on D signs have been stolen as well, including in my front yard," Gonzalez wrote.

This story contains 722 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Posted by EASY TO ACCUSE, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 26, 2013 at 11:41 am

"Cheryl Lilienstein, one of the leaders of the campaign opposing the measure, publicly leveled a series of accusations "

the anti-D group has been very active in hurling accusations (false, I may add) at supporters of measure D, as well as the board and executives of PAHC, the city council.
I now call on Ms Lilienstein to provide her proof that it was the Yes on D people that stole the yard signs. It is easy to accuse people, but I bet you we will not hear a word from Ms Cheryl when one asks for proof.
What is her role in the disappearance of the Yes on D signs???

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 26, 2013 at 3:28 pm

I strongly suggest bored teenagers take the signs. It is the sort of thing they think is funny. They don't realize that others will be accused of stealing the signs. They just think it is a prank.

I don't know this for a fact, I just suggest it because it sounds much more likely than any side stealing the other side's signs.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields