Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - February 10, 2012

Letters

Stop high-speed rail

Editor,

In 2008 the people of California approved the funding of California high-speed rail. I confess that I voted for it.

In the greatest bait-and-switch in human history, the $30 billion cost has become $100 billion. The pledge to not start construction until all funding is identified has become "let's start immediately and figure out what to do when we run out of funds." The ridership estimate has been cut in half and is still too high by a factor of 10. The claim that no operating subsidy will be needed when the system is finished is a joke. This system will bankrupt the state and force cuts in education and local public transportation, which is where our transportation dollars should be going.

The No Train Please Act is a ballot initiative to end the high-speed rail project. It has been qualified to gather signatures to put the issue to the people on the November ballot.

850,000 signatures are needed. They must be collected by June 1. There are no wealthy people backing this, so there is no money for paid signature gatherers. Thus, qualifying the initiative will be a stretch.

You can download the petition from the No Train Please website.

David Lieberman

Kingsley Avenue

Track college requirements

Editor,

While a change to Gunn and Paly's graduation requirements necessarily takes years to implement, there is a change in information provided to Gunn and Paly students and parents that can be done quickly.

Unofficial high school transcripts could list progress toward UC and CSU requirements along with progress toward Palo Alto Unified School District graduation requirements.

Such a change could provide the necessary information to current and future students and parents about these requirements and whether they are being met. We might even find that listing progress toward UC and CSU requirements has the desired effect of increasing the percentage of students who meet them, without putting additional stress and hurdles for those who plan to attend colleges that don't have these admission requirements.

Let's provide individualized UC and CSU requirements status information to our high school students now. Information is power. Let's start there first.

Arthur M. Keller

Corina Way

Prop. 8: church and state

Editor,

Justice has been served by the overturn of the Proposition 8 ban on gay marriage. I hope that the value of equal rights for all stands supreme.

To those who disagree, I point out that your church may not recognize gay marriage, however marriage under the eyes of the law, which carries with it many rights and privileges under the law, must be recognized.

To set the law according the standards of religion would be a clear violation of the separation of church and state — the Constitution doesn't just protect the rights we like. Liberty and justice for all. Period.

Timothy Gray

Park Boulevard

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields