Palo Alto's young mayor packs policy experience | January 6, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - January 6, 2012

Palo Alto's young mayor packs policy experience

Yiaway Yeh brings understanding of government, history of community building to position

by Gennady Sheyner

When Yiaway Yeh cast the deciding vote last July to send a labor-reform measure on the November ballot, just about everyone in the Council Chambers raised an eyebrow or two in disbelief.

This story contains 996 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at


Posted by Public-Policy-Is-More-Than-What-I-Say-It-Is, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 6, 2012 at 8:54 am

> "I kind of reached a point where I want clarity," Yeh said
> at the July 18 meeting. "I want to know where the voters
> ultimately are."

While Yeh’s vote to allow the electorate to decide whether to rescind their mid-70s vote on binding arbitration was a surprise, given the heavy support provide to Yeh by labor unions when he ran for Council in 2007, claiming that “his own personal clarity” is “policy” is ludicrous. Yeh is to be complimented for his decision (maybe even courage) to allow the voters to rethink the binding arbitration question—seeking “personal clarity” is not remotely the basis for making public policy.

If Yeh has suggested that questions decided by the voters should be redecided every thirty years, or when the need calls for a re-vote—this would have been the basis for “public policy”. If Yeh had authored some white papers about the impacts of rising labor costs on public services, or future taxation requirements needed to pay all public employees more than $200K per year (which is possible within a decade or so)—then this practice, and the information revealed by such studies/reports, etc. would be the basis for “public policy”.

But Yeh has done nothing to communicate with the electorate, the business owners, and the property owners. In all fairness—neither has any other Council Member. But Yeh is now Mayor, and has shown nothing in terms of a paper trail to justify the claims of the so-called “Inner Circle” to be prepared for this role.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 6, 2012 at 9:22 am

Not sure why the Weekly is wasting so much space on the issue of Palo Alto mayor. Let us be clear this is a popularity contest, nothing more. What we have is a story full of present and former council members taking turns patting each other on the back and saying what a wonderful job they are doing. This happens every year.
Another poor story from Gennady Sheynar. Perhaps he should consider pursuing real stories--like the HSR fiasco, the infrastructure backlog in the city, with a focus on why the people in charge are negligent in their duties and are more interested in bike bridges and electric charging stations

Posted by Phil, a resident of Downtown North
on Jan 6, 2012 at 10:31 am

Let me see. A politician reversing course. How shocking!

Posted by bill g, a resident of Barron Park
on Jan 6, 2012 at 11:37 am

The comment Mr. Yeh made about it being "Greg Schmid's turn" to become Mayor (presumably by becoming vice mayor this year), bothers me. The job is more important than to be passed along on the basis of seniority alone. We've had several mayors who did a poor job - either by only focusing on one program, by letting council members ramble on repeating points they've made, or by plainly not sure how to run a meeting.

I do agree that Mr. Yeh has not shown he can lead with a firm hand, but seems to look to others for direction. The one great thing he did was to permit the thousands of voters to repeal arbitration rather than only 5 council members making the decision.

Public-policy-.... Mr. Espinosa communicated with the business community, electorate and property owners more than the past three mayors combined and was one of the better mayors in recent history.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 6, 2012 at 12:04 pm

"The comment Mr. Yeh made about it being "Greg Schmid's turn" to become Mayor (presumably by becoming vice mayor this year), bothers me. "

That is the way things go here. You will note Karen Holman felt that her choice for vice mayor was worthy because he "had served his time" on the council. I am sure Holman will feel that she deserves to be vice mayor and mayor when she has served x number of year son the council. Unless you are Jack Morton, you get elected mayor and get to parade around pushing your agenda (climate change, emergency preparedness, traffic, community involvement etc) for a year, while blissfully ignoring our infrastructure backlog.
As I stated earlier, this is a popularity contest with plenty of back slapping and self-serving praise

Posted by PA Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 6, 2012 at 2:22 pm

"That is the way things go here." No it isn't, Mayor and Vice-mayors are not elected to serve in those positions because of seniority or longest elected Councilperson.

Several Councilpersons have been passed over in the past because they were not considered able to serve as Mayor or Vice-mayor. They were good Councilpersons but running those Council Meetings requires a nimble mind and orderly control not someone who stalls and speaks forever.

We have even had Mayors who, after nine months, still could not run a meeting according to protocol.

As for Karen Holman, she will probably be Vice-Mayor next year, I hope so.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Jan 6, 2012 at 2:40 pm

"No it isn't, Mayor and Vice-mayors are not elected to serve in those positions because of seniority or longest elected Councilperson."
Well, i think the only exception you will find in recent times is when Jack Morton was passed over in favor of Peter Drekmeier a few years back. I f you look at all the mayors we have had over the past decade (Mossar, Burch, Kishimoto, Klein, Burt, Kleinberg, Ojakian and others) it all comes down to seniority. It is an opportunity, as I have stated, for the council to engage in back slapping and self-serving praise. Generally you become mayor/vie-mayor in your second term--recently due to a higher than usual turnover (or the fact that Jack Morton was not trusted to be mayor) first termers are filling the positions.
Woe is us when Holman becomes mayor--the focus will be on historic issues and aesthetically pleasing structures.

Posted by pat, a resident of Midtown
on Jan 6, 2012 at 5:40 pm

Re seniority: Let’s not forget when the council gave Jim Burch the mayorship because he was 79 years old and was not going to run for another term.

Posted by Too Tame, a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Jan 9, 2012 at 11:41 am

Glad that pat has weighed in here, although her comments are far too tame to be entertaining. Let's have the vintage pat, please.

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 9, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Hey Too Tame--having fun being a troll?? You are posting as Dial It up on another thread:
Web Link
Try posting something of interest.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields