Palo Alto Weekly

News - January 6, 2012

Cubberley, growing enrollment, budget top 2012 school concerns

City looks to end Cubberley lease, but will school district be ready?

by Chris Kenrick

Planning for the future of Cubberley Community Center will likely take center stage in 2012, along with growing school-district enrollment and a shrinking budget, according to school-district officials.

A citizen commission in December recommended the City of Palo Alto terminate its lease of district-owned Cubberley, located at 4000 Middlefield Road, a move that would have a significant impact on Palo Alto school finances, said Camille Townsend, president of the Board of Education.

"It would be huge," Townsend said of the proposals put forth by the city's Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission. She spoke in a wide-ranging Dec. 31 interview on topics likely to come before the school board in 2012.

Termination of the city's $6.1 million in annual payments to the school district is one of the major recommendations in the city Blue Ribbon Commission's 170-page report on how to deal with the city's mounting infrastructure problems.

The city has scheduled a Jan. 17 public hearing on the recommendations.

The current Cubberley lease agreement between the school district and the city expires in 2014.

The school board and City Council have pledged to hold talks on the future of the 35-acre campus, but Townsend said, "I think the city is under a tighter timeline than the school district, but obviously we all need to sit down and work through those timelines together.

"I think the City Council will ask what impact this will have on the schools. The Council as much as the school board wants to maintain the integrity of the schools."

Last summer, the Board of Education successfully dissuaded the council from selling the 8 city-owned acres of Cubberley, insisting that with growing enrollment the district eventually would need to reclaim the full property for schools.

But contending with budget cuts and uncertain enrollment projections, school leaders have kept mum on exactly how and when the land will be needed.

At its peak in 1968, Palo Alto had an enrollment of 15,000 students, with three high schools, three middle schools and more than 20 elementary campuses.

Student headcount fell to a low of 7,500 in 1989 and then began creeping steadily back upward. For the current school year it stands at 12,286, with two high schools, three middle schools and 12 elementary schools.

The school board is scheduled to hear the latest demographic projections for enrollment Tuesday (Jan. 10).

But, she said, the district needs to stay flexible "given operating budget fluctuations and uncertainty about how much money we actually have to educate kids.

"There's always the argument that if you open a whole new school you have all the administrative costs. And if our operating budget is going down, well, sometimes numbers talk. So if we were to open another school, we have to look at what it costs and where the money's going to come from.

"On the other hand, I understand people's concern that Cubberley is not looking as good as it should and everyone wants to tackle that."

The school district has been in cautious, budget-cutting mode since 2009, while maintaining what it calls an "unrestricted, undesignated fund balance" to cover so-called "ongoing structural deficits."

The district made $3.8 million in cuts to the roughly $160 million operating budget in 2010-11 and another $2.7 million reflected in the current year's budget.

By February, school administrators said they'll recommend between $1.2 million and $2.8 million in cuts to the current year's budget.

Much of the earlier reductions were achieved through incremental increases in elementary class sizes, which have bumped up from 20 to 22 in grades K-3, and from 23 to 24 in grades 4-5.

"In the last two rounds we could shield out instructional programs from deep cuts, but this may not be possible for the upcoming cuts," the school district's Co-Chief Business Official Cathy Mak has told the board.

Townsend is worried now about class sizes in the high schools which, in some Advanced Placement classes, are as high as 39, she said.

As a so-called "basic aid" district funded primarily through property tax, Palo Alto does not collect revenue based on headcount, so enrollment growth means less money per student.

"As a result of state funding cuts, enrollment growth and relatively flat property-tax growth, the district now receives $939 less per student compared to three years ago," Mak said.

Cooperation between the city and school district on Cubberley dates back to the 1980s when following the 1979 closure of the high school due to declining enrollment community leaders crafted a plan to preserve the Cubberley acreage while providing a revenue stream to the schools.

The city pays the school district $4.48 million a year to lease Cubberley, which it in turn leases out as a community center. Additionally, the city pays the schools $1.73 million a year under a "covenant" in which the district promises not to sell any district-owned land for housing development, as well as $600,000 to ensure the schools offer after-school day care on elementary campuses.

But the infrastructure commission said the city no longer can afford the Cubberley deal.

"With our city struggling to meet the financial requirements of the General Fund, let alone catching up and keeping up with the maintenance of the city's infrastructure demands, now is the appropriate time for the school district to re-establish its management and financial responsibilities of and for the Cubberley site," commissioners said.

Staff Writer Chris Kenrick can be emailed ckenrick@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 6, 2012 at 10:38 am

This is long overdue, but I am so pleased to see that the school board is talking about this at last.

Interestingly, it is not the present board that will ultimately make any decisions but the next board which means that all candidates will have to make their views on this known from the starting block.

For the elections, candidates need to know and publicise on their views on Cubberley, rising enrollment and school calendar. No wishywashy feel good candidates need apply.


Posted by Marool, a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jan 6, 2012 at 11:13 am

Good to see the city moving toward some common sense decision making and planning. The city can no longer afford the Cubberley deal, along with many other high price niche projects that need to be shelved.


Posted by We need a master plan, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 6, 2012 at 12:39 pm

PAUSD needs a long-term master plan for facilities. I would like the Board of Education to stop wringing their hands over lack of certainty about enrollment projections (projections are ALWAYS uncertain--everyone uses them for planning purposes). Direct PAUSD staff to create a plan and make sure they get it done in a time frame that will allow informed collaboration about the Cubberley site with the city.

Ms. Townsend, the city and school district don't have different schedules. The city is your tenant and can opt to end the lease covenant agreement when its term is up. That schedule IS the schedule. If the district does not responsibly demonstrate a strong effort to collaborate in this process, they should not be surprised about political and financial repurcussions.

Direct staff to create a master plan. It is long overdue.


Posted by PA Neighbor, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 6, 2012 at 12:59 pm

With regard to the future of Cubberley. Since the School District stopped the City selling their 8 acres to Foothill College, the PAUSD should either buy back those 8 acres from the City; or negotiate a land swap whereby the School District takes back those buildable 8 acres and exchanges them for 8 acres of Cubberley's playing fields.

The City should then sign a Covernent to maintain their 8 acres of playing fields in the same way they maintain Terman's playing fields.

The School District will then regain control of all the buildings at Cubberley together with the tenants, and the tenant's rental income. It may not be $6.1 Million but it will allow the School District flexibility in deciding it's future educational requirements.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields