Palo Alto Weekly

News - November 11, 2011

PG&E pipeline may have been damaged by backhoe

Natural gas line burst near I-280 in Woodside Sunday afternoon

A PG&E natural gas pipeline that exploded during pressure testing on Sunday afternoon (Nov. 6), causing a mudslide across Interstate Highway 280 in Woodside, was likely damaged by a backhoe, a utility spokesman said Monday.

Line 132 ruptured during hydrostatic testing on a knoll above Highway 280 near Farm Hill Boulevard at about 3:20 p.m., PG&E spokesman David Eisenhauer said.

A preliminary investigation indicated that the section of pipe had been damaged by a backhoe sometime after the line was installed in 1947. PG&E is looking into when that damage might have occurred and what agency might have been responsible, Eisenhauer said.

The explosion left a 5-foot-by-5-foot crater in the hillside, and water from inside the pipeline caused a mudslide that reached northbound Highway 280 and blocked two lanes for about four hours, California Highway Patrol Officer Art Montiel said. No one was injured.

The test was being conducted as part of an ongoing safety evaluation of natural gas transmission lines in "high consequence" or highly populated areas, Eisenhauer said.

"That's exactly why we do these type of safety tests, to find weaknesses in the pipeline," he said.

PG&E crews have conducted pressure tests on more than 120 miles of pipeline since April. Eisenhauer said no homes or buildings were damaged by Sunday's rupture and that the utility employs different testing strategies on pipelines that run directly through neighborhoods, such as placing cameras or "pigs" that run inside the pipes to detect corrosion or faulty seams.

Bay City News Service

Comments

Posted by Janet, a resident of Menlo Park
on Nov 7, 2011 at 5:02 pm

Something happened in 1947 and they just now discovered it! Give me a break.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 7, 2011 at 6:07 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

If the protective coating of the pipeline was breached in 1947 [PG&E said sometime after] it could conceivably take 64 years to corrode through.


Posted by responsibility, a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Nov 7, 2011 at 6:23 pm

"PG&E is looking into when that damage might have occurred and what agency might have been responsible, Eisenhauer said."

Is PG&E refusing to take responsibility for the integrity of their pipeline? I am getting sick and tired of all this finger pointing.


Posted by reader, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Nov 7, 2011 at 10:36 pm

"A preliminary investigation indicated that the section of pipe that ruptured had been damaged by a backhoe sometime after the line was installed in 1947."

That means it could have been damaged by road or telecom or PG&E crews 5 years ago, NOT that it was damaged before/during installation.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 8, 2011 at 8:49 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

"Is PG&E refusing to take responsibility for the integrity of their pipeline? I am getting sick and tired of all this finger pointing."
Short of posting guards every 500 feet, PG&E has to rely on the many signs and the integrity of equipment operators. Usually that works.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields