Palo Alto Weekly

News - September 30, 2011

School board enthusiastic about property deal

Pending environmental tests, school district likely to approve first acquisition in decades

by Chris Kenrick

For the first time in decades, the Palo Alto Unified School District is on the verge of acquiring new property as it contends with rising enrollment, particularly in the southern part of town.

Board of Education members Tuesday night expressed enthusiasm for an $8.5 million deal to acquire a 2.6-acre parcel at 525 San Antonio Road. The property, which housed Peninsula Day Care Center before it closed in June, backs up onto the Greendell School campus, which is contiguous with Cubberley Community Center.

Pending the results of environmental tests, the board is expected to authorize purchase of 525 San Antonio at its next meeting Oct. 11, using funds from Measure A, the $378 million bond voters approved in 2008 for school improvements. The property is currently under contract to be sold to residential developer SummerHill San Antonio Land Holding, but SummerHill has indicated its willingness to sell the property, in turn, to the school district, according to a staff report.

"I'm absolutely thrilled. This is the first proposed addition of public school land in over a generation, ending an old, long streak of school district sales," board member Barb Mitchell said.

She was referring to the sell-off during the 1980s of a number of Palo Alto elementary school sites as enrollment contracted in the post-Baby Boom era.

At its enrollment peak in 1968, Palo Alto had nearly 16,000 students, with three high schools, three middle schools and more than 20 elementary schools. Enrollment declined through the 1970s and '80s, reaching a low of 7,500 in 1989 before trending upward again.

Today, with 12,286 students, Palo Alto has two high schools, three middle schools and 12 elementary schools.

At Tuesday's meeting, board members parsed the nuances of this fall's enrollment data even as they asserted the need for a 20-year long-range plan.

With elementary headcount growing at 4 percent for the past several years, members agreed on the need for new facilities.

But some noted that kindergarten enrollment was flat this fall, wondering whether that should be interpreted as "a blip or a trend."

Despite much discussion of the need for new space in the southern part of Palo Alto, the district has made no formal commitment on how it would use the prospective new property on San Antonio Road. The school board last year also voted to take back the old Garland School site on North California Avenue but has not decided when, or how, that site would come back online.

Board President Melissa Baten Caswell said there's an urgent need for more middle school space.

"We're going to hit a middle school problem before we hit an elementary problem," she said. "We can put a few more kids in a classroom, put a portable here, add another building at (an elementary) site, but we hit maximum at our middle schools faster than that.

"Certainly within the next five years were going to need a solution."

Mitchell said a decision on the use of Garland is also needed.

"The sooner we can make that decision, the longer we have as an implementation and transition period to help community members and staff plan the implementation," she said.

Board Vice President Camille Townsend said she hoped to avoid stirring up premature anxieties about school boundary changes.

"Uncertainty does unnerve people. ... In the past it was a discussion that created great uncertainty and got a lot of anger going. I want to make sure our conversations are taken as conversations, and that things are fluid until we have to make a decision. Otherwise people get positional before they need to," Townsend said.

Staff Writer Chris Kenrick can be emailed at ckenrick@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 28, 2011 at 8:02 am

How would this deal work? Is it for sale on the open market to the highest bidder? I don't think that is the case. Will it be eminent domain?


Posted by Erin, a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 am

I don't understand how increasing class size over the maximum of 20 per class (as our parcel tax states) or having over 550 kids at a site that was built for 360 is not an elementary school problem.

You are well beyond an elementary school problem here, but you have put your blinders on and refuse to look at it because you don't want to move choice schools or redo the boundary lines that seem so sacred in our district. At some point, people have to move to alleviate the pressures on our kids.


Posted by Blip or a Trend, a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Sep 28, 2011 at 10:52 am

Isn't that the big issue to get a grip on? Maybe for middle schools we'll need capacity anyway, but for the high school capacity issue, "blip vs. trend" is the $64 million question.

How do we figure it out??


Posted by Finnaly, a resident of Midtown
on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:57 pm

Finally, we can have a third high school. Once they buy the property, they have no excuse to have such a crowded high school.


Posted by Another great deal, a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:29 pm

"...$8.5 million deal to acquire a 2.6-acre parcel." Such a deal ...and a tear-down to boot. A seller's market for sure ...or some great negotiating on the part of PAUSD.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields