Palo Alto Weekly

News - November 19, 2010

E-books spark outcry at Palo Alto libraries

As city plans to reduce print collection in favor of e-books, some see move as 'betrayal' of city's earlier promise

by Gennady Sheyner

Palo Alto City Councilman Greg Scharff announced earlier this month that he has given up on "real books."

It's not that he doesn't read. He just finds print books too unwieldy and prefers to do his reading on his Kindle or his iPad.

"I don't like holding hard-cover books in my hand anymore — they're too heavy," Scharff said at a Nov. 1 meeting between the council and the Library Advisory Commission.

Scharff, who said he reads three to four books a month, said his three children have also made the switch, to varying degrees. His 18-year-old still reads paper books, while his 15-year-old has largely made the switch to digital. His youngest, who is 13, gets all his information from digital media.

Scharff called the e-book phenomenon "amazing" and predicted that books will "become anachronistic." He had even fiercer words for print periodicals.

"I think they'll just go away, and we'll end up purely with electronic periodicals," Scharff said, while Councilwoman Gail Price displayed her disagreement with a jocular you-just-stuck-a-knife-into-my-heart gesture.

The tension between print and e-books has particular resonance in Palo Alto these days. Library officials and council members acknowledge (most to a lesser extent that Scharff) that the publishing world is quickly transforming. Mayor Pat Burt told the library commission that the "only constant you'll see is change" and predicted, "Right now we may be at the tipping point for electronic books."

This nationwide transformation is looming large in the minds of local library officials because it happens to coincide with Palo Alto's own physical transformation of its aged library facilities. Now, the city must decide where its library's future will lie: in print or in digital volumes.

When city officials asked residents in 2008 to approve a $76 million bond (which voters did), they touted a larger collection as one of the major benefits of the project. But library officials and project architects are increasingly arguing that the "collection" does not necessarily mean print volumes.

The heated conversation about electronic books began in earnest in March and hit a fever pitch in the past month, as city officials began to finalize the new design of the Main Library — the last of the three libraries slated for renovations. Members of the group Friends of the Palo Alto Library (FOPAL), which sells books (the traditional kind) to raise money for local libraries, have come out swinging against a new proposal by the library staff and consulting architects to reduce shelving and increase seating at the Main Library — a setup that would lead to fewer print volumes at the library.

The group led a similar revolt last year, when staff proposed reducing the book collection at the Downtown branch. Staff ultimately agreed to add books to the small and central library.

The design work for the new and improved Main Library was largely completed in 2007, when e-books were just a speck on the horizon. In March of this year, Kathy Page, the city's space consultant for libraries, warned the Library Advisory Commission that this trend wasn't considered at the time officials were putting the designs together.

In a memo to former Library Director Diane Jennings and the city's architect, Group 4 Architecture, Page said that two library projects she has recently worked on estimated that 10 to 20 percent of the future collection would be electronic only. She recommended that 5 to 10 percent of the collection in the new Mitchell Park library be solely in electronic format. She also predicted the growth of e-readers, MP3 players, smart phones and personal computers would "continue to push public demand for digital content."

"As we plan facilities designed to serve the next generations of library users, factoring out a portion of shelving is not only valid but the responsible thing to do," Page wrote.

In April and again at the Oct. 28 meeting, when the library commission held a long and thorough discussion on design modification at Mitchell Park and Main libraries, Page emphasized the changing desires of libraries.

"There's a growing interest in electronic material with Kindles, iBooks and all these things," Page said at the October meeting. "We're moving into a direction where it's commonplace for long-term planning in the library to assume that a certain fraction of the collection would be digital."

Group 4 Architecture, which is designing all three bond-funded libraries, proposed a series of revisions to accommodate the new trend — namely, more seating, less shelving and fewer bound volumes. The goal for the city collection remains at 338,000 books and materials. But at Mitchell Park, the adult nonfiction print collection would increase from 17,080 volumes to 30,960 volumes rather than the originally planned 37,872. The adult fiction print collection would go from 8,000 volumes to 16,128 volumes rather than 17,856. The rest would be e-books.

At the Main Library, the changes would be more dramatic and hence more controversial. The adult collections, under the revisions, would actually shrink from the current 72,528 volumes to about 60,000. The branch would, however, pick up more seats, larger shelves and wider aisles than under the previous design.

This week, the plan ran into a wave of opposition from FOPAL members, who characterized the proposal to reduce shelves as a betrayal of the city's promise to its residents to expand the collection. Jim Schmidt, president of the FOPAL board, noted at Tuesday's community meeting at the Main Library that about 80 percent of the surveyed residents said before the 2008 vote that they view an expanded collection as the most important aspect of the colossal library project.

Tom Wyman, a member of FOPAL, warned city officials and architects that the changes could be interpreted as a "bait and switch" by residents who supported the bond because they wanted more volumes.

"We're all looking at it as potential for creating ill will," Wyman said, referring to the proposed revisions to the Main Library design. "Right now, there's a lot of people here who see this as a retrograde step — cutting the collection at this library."

His wife, Ellen, who is also on the FOPAL board, said she and many other people would see the cutback at the Main Library as a "simply dishonest" act by the city.

"If they want to pass another bond measure in the next eon, they better not do it," she said.

Jeff Levinsky, former president of FOPAL, also downplayed the rise of the e-books, noting that these books still make up only 0.6 percent of the library system's total circulation. Levinsky, who said he reads e-books, also characterized the decrease of print books as a "broken promise."

"Growth (in e-books) may seem large, but it's still a tiny, tiny share," Levinsky said Tuesday.

Others reject FOPAL's perspective, however. Valerie Stinger, vice chair of the commission, recalled a recent technology forum during which a woman from Channing House, a senior facility, approached her to inquire when books will become available for the iPad. The woman said the iPad makes it easier for her to see the reading material.

Leif Schaumann went a step further and said at Tuesday's meeting that the entire premise of the city's library-renovation project is misguided. He suggested the city consult with tech giants such as Google and Yahoo to figure out what the future will bring.

"I'd propose that five to 10 years from now, there will be no need for libraries or for staffing," Schaumann said, prompting another audience member to remind him that he was stating an opinion rather than fact. "All that you're seeing here is an extension of the past."

To honor its promise to the voters, yet also accept burgeoning digital preferences, the Library Advisory Commission has chosen to take the middle path and make "flexibility" the defining feature of the new designs. Last month, the commission unanimously adopted the plans recommended by Group 4 for the city libraries, but specified that the design should make it easy for the city to add shelving should the need arise.

Commissioner Bob Moss acknowledged the commission doesn't know how prominent e-books will be in the next few years, when the new and renovated libraries are finished.

"We made some assumptions, one of which is that we'll have an increase in e-books and a decrease in paper books over the next three or four years, which means you can put more things physically into a small space," Moss said. "We also said, 'We could be wrong.'

"The layout was designed so if we need more book spaces, they could be put back in."

Library officials and project architects also stress that the new libraries will provide the city with more than just bookshelves. They will also feature more seating space, better lighting, an outlet for a laptop at every table and new community and program rooms — places where residents can hold meetings and socialize.

Local libraries remain hugely popular, despite the changing trends in users' behavior, architect Dawn Merkes of Group 4 said at the Oct. 28 meeting of the library commission. Renovated libraries in cities such as Milpitas and Mountain View have been bringing in crowds, she said, and so will Palo Alto's.

"My understanding of the community that this library will serve is that every seat will be taken no matter how many seats you will have," Merkes said of the new Mitchell Park Library. "You can use every seat you can get and there will still be a teen sitting outside on the patio — just like now."

TALK ABOUT IT

What do you think the future of the Palo Alto Library should be? Do you read print or e-books? Share your opinion on Town Square, the community discussion forum, on Palo Alto Online.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be e-mailed at gsheyner@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Nov 19, 2010 at 6:48 am

"Members of the group Friends of the Palo Alto Library (FOPAL), which sells books (the traditional kind) to raise money for local libraries, have come out swinging against a new proposal by the library staff and consulting architects to reduce shelving and increase seating at the Main Library — a setup that would lead to fewer print volumes at the library."

Naturally FOPAL is against e-books. AS the use of e-books rises, the need for traditional books will decline--and with that the influence of FOPAL. They are trying to protect their turf. That means that our libraries should remain as quaint 19th century structures. I am surprised they have not come out against wi-fi and computers in the library.
Too bad that FOPAL ha sto resort to threats to get their point across (""If they want to pass another bond measure in the next eon, they better not do it," she said.")
This is another example of where a small vocal group has forced their mindset on the community at large. Time for FOPAL to step into the 21st century


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 19, 2010 at 7:46 am

This argument was made by many before the vote on the bond, but it was made to deaf ears. Now we are being forced to pay for a library we don't have and won't have.

This is just like paying off a car loan on a car that has been totalled.


Posted by Anon, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 19, 2010 at 8:16 am

I don't see printed books disappearing myself-- but, if they do, then, we don't need "libraries". Let Starbucks deal with coffee-guzzling business people and their laptops.


Posted by Neighbor, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Nov 19, 2010 at 12:53 pm

I'm glad the Mitchell Park library is being built as part of a larger Community Center. If digital reading obsoletes libraries, the library section at MP can become part of a larger Community Center facility.

The lease with the School District for Cubberley ends in January 2014, I don't think the City should either renew or even consider extending that lease; let the PAUSD have that deteriorating bunch of 1950s classrooms back.

The local south PA community will have the new Mitchell Park library and community center facility anyway, to use well into the future.


Posted by What was the poll for?, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Nov 19, 2010 at 3:10 pm

If the library was going to continue to reduce its collections, why did it misrepresent the purpose of the bond, which they said was to make more space for collections.
That's what we said we wanted in the poll they did before the bond election. Were we snookered into spending 78 million dollars for public living rooms and childcare centers? Was the poll just to give them strategies for promoting the bond?
The announcement of the death of the book is premature, Greg Scharff's silly experience notwithstanding.


Posted by Anon, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 20, 2010 at 2:00 pm

As previously stated, I don't agree that printed materials are dead. But, if they really are, then, we are building the wrong buildings. Libraries are slightly unusual, with the need to support heavy floor loadings and bookshelves that don't tip over in earthquakes. If we need to build a large coffee shop/laptop room, the construction costs will be lower.

Let's finish the library rebuild/renovation for books, and, deal with the coffee shop/laptop building later if we need to.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields