Guest Opinion: Rail debate becomes a push to 'Save Our Caltrain!' | November 5, 2010 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - November 5, 2010

Guest Opinion: Rail debate becomes a push to 'Save Our Caltrain!'

by Yoriko Kishimoto

In 1851, officials of the brand-new State of California proposed a rail line to connect the first state capital, San Jose, to the emerging trading center of San Francisco. The three counties of San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara financed the beginning of this railroad nine years later, according to records.

This story contains 882 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Yoriko Kishimoto is a former Palo Alto City Council member and mayor, and co-founder of the Peninsula Cities Consortium to voice common interests in reducing negative impacts of the California High Speed Rail Authority plans for the Peninsula segment of the proposed state high-speed rail system. She can be e-mailed at ykishimoto@earthlink.com.

Comments

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2010 at 6:53 pm

Caltrain needs to become more user friendly.

It needs to advertise, particularly in conjunction with special events, sports, theater, concerts, etc.

It needs to restructure fares to enable cheaper off peak fares for after 10.00 am and family fares to enable an adult to take a couple of kids for a special rate.

These simple ideas and other innovations will make Caltrain more attractive to those who are not using the service.

Public transit should be increasing ridership and accordingly adding service. Public transit should not be decreasing service to save money. It is a service, not a money maker. It should not be losing money, but it should be servicing the public. At present, it is doing nothing to attract riders other than regular commuters. Regular commuters will only continue to use it while it serves their needs. Reducing service will reduce ridership.


Posted by Resident, a resident of University South
on Nov 5, 2010 at 11:41 pm

Resident,

What is the funding source you propose to use to finance better service and operations?


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 6, 2010 at 4:52 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Elevators are paid for by the businesses that benefit from customers using elevators to access them. Perhaps a business model could develop charges that more directly reflect the benefit of the transit, perhaps some shopper rebate to partially cover the transit cost. Businesses that did not opt in would instead bear the total cost of their parking structures.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 6, 2010 at 8:45 am

Resident

Caltrain needs to spend its money on things that actually help.

Eg. New electronic signs have been put up at the stations. They tell you where you are and what the time is. We know where we are and we have our own devices to tell us the time. These signs cost x amount of money and are a waste of effort unless they are useful. The funding of these signs could have been spent on advertising and introducing off peak fares and off peak family tickets.

If the empty seats during the off peak times are filled, then there will be increased revenue to improve service. If there is an advertising budget the increased ridership, particularly for events, will pay for it. Advertising will work because at present there is no advertising to attract new riders. The only new riders are from word of mouth.


Posted by commuter, a resident of Community Center
on Nov 6, 2010 at 10:06 am

Caltrain is just as important part of our transportation infrastructure as Highway 101. Why does Caltrain have to jump through hoops to get funding?


Posted by Self-serving op-ed, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Nov 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm

1) Looks like Kishimoto is all gung ho about Caltrain. Back in 2008 she was all gung ho about HSR. She was in the forefront in promoting a yes vote for the measure--then a month later she did an about face--still no explanation from her about why she changed her mind so quickly. Who knows if she will change her mind about Caltrain when some new "green" initiative catches her eye in a few weeks.

2) She refers to Stanford in a positive manner--yet during her tenure on the council she was the leader in bashing Stanford, while make outrageous demands from them. I guess when it is for a self-serving purpose, saying nice things about Stanford is okay.

3)Once again we hear from Kishimoto about "walkable" communities. This is one of her favorite words--too bad she has done nothing about it. How come two of Palo Alto's shopping centers are gone and during her 8 years on the council nothing was done to save them?
Yes, talking about walkable neighborhoods is okay, but actually doing something is harder than just talking about it.


Posted by William Beaudine, a resident of Professorville
on Nov 6, 2010 at 10:25 pm

I see that the self-titled "Palo Alto queen of Green" will not go quietly away--after her humiliating trouncing in the primaries (more than 70% of the votes against her) you would think she would keepa low profile, but no...
Somehow though I miss seeing her pinched face on the council, with that perennial sour expression of hers, whining all the time about traffic--especially on embarcadero Road (I wonder why).


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 7, 2010 at 4:34 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

My concern is that the animus against HSR will overlap and affect the needed improvement to conventional rail. Elimination of grade crossings and electrification, both piggybacking on HSR, are less likely to interest the politicians who view the present attacks as being anti-rail.


Posted by Occasional user, a resident of Meadow Park
on Nov 7, 2010 at 6:25 am

I think Caltrain should declare bankruptcy; there would be such an outcry along the corridor that Cities would be forced to come forward with more money.

This lurching along with eternal threats of bankruptcy isn't working. We're so tired of hearing about their financial problems that most of us are turned off.

Also, with the possibility of HSR coming what's the incentive for Caltrain to make improvements anyway?

"We are planning a kick-off "Caltrain Summit" With Yoriko in charge bankruptcy is a very real possibility. Let Caltrain go out of business, and see what happens.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields