Palo Alto Weekly

News - October 15, 2010

Valley execs support Whitman's 'independent' campaign

Despite area's political leanings, Atherton Republican enjoys local fundraising edge over Democrat Jerry Brown

by Gennady Sheyner

Palo Alto may be a Democratic bastion, but it's the Republican candidate for governor who is leading the race for local campaign cash, records show.

Meg Whitman, the former eBay CEO who constantly portrays herself as an independent outsider, has raked in more contributions from Palo Alto donors than her Democratic opponent, Attorney General Jerry Brown, despite the city's heavy Democratic leanings. By Sept. 30, Whitman has received $526,111 compared to the $328,553 raised by Brown.

In Menlo Park, another Silicon Valley city that normally favors Democrats, Whitman had raised $272,749 from local donors by the end of September, compared to $134,865 raised by Brown.

Whitman's hometown advantage has exaggerated the fundraising difference in Atherton, where she enjoyed a nearly eightfold lead over Brown $738,131 versus $97,143.

The topic of campaign finance re-emerged at this week's gubernatorial debate at the Dominican College in San Rafael. Whitman, a billionaire who has invested about $140 million into her campaign, said her personal contributions allow her to be independent from special interests and accused Brown of being beholden to public-employee unions, who contributed heavily to his campaign.

"The expenditure of my own money allows me to be independent, to go to Sacramento with no strings attached," Whitman said.

Brown countered that in addition to Whitman's own contributions, she has received millions from "the kind of corporate executives who would benefit directly from her key economic plank." Whitman's proposals include eliminating the capital-gains tax and imposing a one-year moratorium on Assembly Bill 32, a 2006 law that restricts greenhouse-gas emissions.

Campaign finance reports show that while Whitman's gubernatorial run is largely self-funded, she has also won the confidence and financial support of dozens of the area's leading venture capitalists and CEOs. Many of Whitman's Midpeninsula donors contributed the maximum $25,900 to her campaign in the last reporting period.

In Palo Alto, that list includes Donald Dixon, partner in Trident Capital; John Gunn, chairman of Dodge & Cox; James Breyer, a venture capitalist with Accel Partners; Marc Andreessen, chairman of Ning; Laura Arrillaga, founder of Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund; Thomas Siebel, chairman of First Virtual Group; and Stratton Sclavos, a partner at Radar Partners.

In Menlo Park, Whitman's top donors include venture capitalists Geoff Yang of Redpoint Ventures; William Bowes, Jr., of U.S. Venture Capital; Ravi Mhatre of Lightspeed Venture Partners; David Marquardt of August Capital; and Brion Applegate of Spectrum Equity Investors. In Atherton, her donors include Doug Leone of Sequoia Capital; Nersi Nazari of Pacific General Ventures; and Jesse Rogers of Altamont Capital Partners.

Whitman also received the endorsement earlier this month from the San Jose/Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce, which lauded her local roots and managerial know-how.

"Of course, Meg comes from Silicon Valley and in her years at eBay displayed the kind of leadership we need in Sacramento," chamber President Pat Dando said in a statement.

Between Jan. 1 and Sept. 30, Whitman outspent Brown $120.6 million to $10.7 million, campaign finance data shows.

At Tuesday's debate, Whitman accused Brown of being beholden to public labor unions and said Brown has been "joined in the hip" with unions for 40 years. If Brown is elected, Whitman said, he would convene a meeting with union bosses who would "collect IOUs for having funded Jerry Brown's entire campaign."

Brown disputed Whitman's allegation that union bosses funded his entire campaign and alluded to the support he received from the business community and individual contributors.

Campaign finance data shows that Brown actually received funds from more contributors in Palo Alto than Whitman, but these contributions tended to be smaller than the ones Whitman collected. Brown received $10,000 from developer George Marcus of the firm Marcus & Millichap Co., and another $10,000 from Alma Plaza developer John McNellis. Ed Bugnion, a vice president at Cisco Systems, contributed $10,000 to Brown's campaign, while attorney Chris Kelly contributed $5,000 and developer Charles "Chop" Keenan gave $1,500.

Brown also received smaller checks from Santa Clara County Supervisor Liz Kniss and former Palo Alto Mayor Peter Drekmeier.

Brown ended the last reporting period with $22.6 million in his campaign chest, compared to Whitman's $9.2 million.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be e-mailed at gsheyner@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by WhitmanRules, a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 15, 2010 at 8:47 pm

Congratulations to Meg Whitman! But I didn't vote for her because she's local to the Peninsula--I voted for her because her business experience is exactly what we need in these times of 12+% California unemployment.


Posted by Palo Parent, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Oct 15, 2010 at 8:54 pm

Plus I 100% guar-ran-tee she's going to kill HSR through her backyard.


Posted by Jake, a resident of another community
on Oct 16, 2010 at 1:34 am

But if the HSR plan is changed to include extending the line into our Southern neighbor Country then Whitman would probably support the HSR project. That way lots of cheap labor could be brought into this area daily, ensuring a sustainable and exploitable workforce for generations to come.
Meg could put her project even, R.A.I.L.
Regional Area Illegal Labor


Posted by anonymous, a resident of another community
on Oct 16, 2010 at 9:49 am

Meg has raised more special interest money than Brown.

Just like Arnold - he said he would be indendent because he wouldn't relies on special interest money cuz he was wealthy.

And then set records for raising special interest money.

Meg = another Arnold.

She just employs more illegals.


Posted by Voter, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 18, 2010 at 10:07 am

It's to bad that the money spent on the election is being used to promote all the bla bla bla Talk. The money could have helped a lot of unemployed people to get jobs.


Posted by Jay, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 18, 2010 at 11:36 am

It's encouraging to see some evidence that my Democratic neighbors are finally wising up to what decades of effective one-party rule have done to this state (And no, Schwarzenegger is not a real Republican. In 1970 the Dems took over the CA legislature which they have held with only one year interruption since. In 1970 CA led the Nation in most categories (eductation, wealth, quality of life, etc.) Now we rank near the bottom-- coincidence? I think not.

Vote Whitman!


Posted by Jaco, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 18, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Jay,

It's called Prop 13. It ruined this state.


Posted by anonymous, a resident of another community
on Oct 18, 2010 at 1:49 pm

Jay:

I would have taken a different tack, although I agree it relates far more to Prop 13, and the give-away to the wealthy of property taxes on commercial buildings.

I was thinking: compare America with other countries since 1970 in the areas mentioned ("eductation, wealth, quality of life, etc.")

It isn't Californian legislators, it's more the "Reaganism" since 1980, and the race to the bottom, Nafta, etc..

But Jaco's right, Prop 13 covers it well enough.


Posted by anonymous, a resident of another community
on Oct 19, 2010 at 4:24 pm

Geez, the new ad just destroys it.

Web Link

Meg: just another Arnold.

And they aired it on TV during the great Giants victory today.

Go Gigantes!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields