Schwarzenegger vetoes rail-accountability measure | October 15, 2010 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - October 15, 2010

Schwarzenegger vetoes rail-accountability measure

Budget provisions would have required rail authority to respond the critical reports before receiving funding

by Gennady Sheyner

With a stroke of his line-veto pen, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Monday killed a budget provision that would have forced the California High-Speed Rail Authority to improve its business plan and strengthen its outreach efforts by Feb. 1 or have about a quarter of its annual budget withheld.

This story contains 856 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be e-mailed at gsheyner@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by Frank, a resident of Ventura
on Oct 13, 2010 at 12:30 pm

So what is involved in replacing members of the HSR board with better ones? How did these guys get there? I didn't vote for them...

In general I like the idea of replacing them if we think they are doing a poor job better than withholding funding.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 13, 2010 at 12:38 pm

I was under the impression that Arnold was all for HSR. Not sure where he stands now.


Posted by jardins, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 13, 2010 at 4:06 pm

Arnold is clearly more taken with the magic of what he saw in China and Japan recently, rather than with reality or fiscal and built-environmental responsibility.


Posted by Geoff, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Oct 13, 2010 at 4:45 pm

Arnold's veto means the fix is currently in for HSR at the highest level of State government.

Electing Meg Whitman may be the only way to change HSR support coming from the Governor's office. I'm not advocating Whitman, just reporting the relative support of HSR by Jerry Brown (supports) vs Meg Whitman (does not support).

Supporting those representatives who favor holding HSR Authority to its earlier promises would also be a positive step.


Posted by bill, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 13, 2010 at 5:19 pm

I wonder how the report by Professor Emeritus Eccles, Silicon Valley Manager will Warren, and William Grindley, a former World Bank official, will affect future decisions on the HSR? Apparently this is a well researched study and reports on the many severe flaws in the project.

It's a long report, and one can download it and skim for particular items of interest. Paste the site description below in your browser since this is not a web link.

Web Link


Posted by bill, a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 13, 2010 at 5:21 pm

The link I gave was converted into a web link. Thank you Online.


Posted by HSR supporter, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 13, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Arnold is 1) European and 2) smart. He knows that HSRs are the future of railways, just as everybody else in the world knows, including China, Japan, many European countries and enlightened Americans. Those opposed to HSR either live close to the tracks and are afraid by all the disinformation put out there on noise and other impacts, or people stuck in the past, who want to keep our 1920s version of trains.


Posted by howard, a resident of Crescent Park
on Oct 13, 2010 at 9:46 pm

re:" I wonder how the report by Professor Emeritus Eccles, Silicon Valley Manager will Warren, and William Grindley, a former World Bank official, will affect future decisions on the HSR? Apparently this is a well researched study and reports on the many severe flaws in the project."

Not so. It was written by Eccles, who had a serious conflict of interest. He lives next to the tracks in Atherton and will do anything to stop HSR. The rest of the "authors" just rubber stamped the report -- to their discredit.


Posted by credibility, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 13, 2010 at 11:40 pm

Are you quite sure, Howard? I didn't know Eccles was still with us. Web Link


Posted by John Galt, a resident of Fairmeadow
on Oct 14, 2010 at 10:39 am

Arnold signs or vetoes bills based on the VERY LAST advise he gets. Whoever gets to him last, wins. I have seen him take a position, a good one he has supported, and then veto it at the last minute. Go figure.


Posted by NIMBY-maybe, a resident of Ventura
on Oct 14, 2010 at 6:17 pm

I've never seen the sense in running HSR up the peninsula, where it won't be able to run at high speeds anyway. It ought to have a San Jose station and let people transfer to BART or Caltrain or buses, and then skirt the Bay Area to the east, speeding along to Sacramento. (Somewhere, I sense an Important Person scowling, someone who wants to stay on his butt all the way to San Francisco and not have to change trains. Oh, well.)

Then spend some of the money upgrading Caltrain and maybe -- dare I say it? -- completing BART around the Bay). Long-distance travellers benefit, we locals benefit.

But I have no confidence that anyone will try to maximize the benefits and minimize harm from this thing. They can't even get rapid transit to the airports. As for Meg, Someone Important will whisper in her ear about how much money he stands to lose if HSR isn't built, and she'll change her tune. That's the way the world works.


Posted by jim, a resident of another community
on Oct 16, 2010 at 6:11 pm

There's difference between oversight and accountability, and appeasing people who will never be happy unless they get their way. All Californians are subject to, and obligated to, do their share in helping the State move forward in the new century. We have a future to consider, and economy, and a place in the world market. California is not some barefoot hillbilly backwater, lallygagging along the bayou. WE are a dynamic world leader on many fronts and must compete on the global stage for a share of the world's commerce. While nations around the world are moving forward to update their systems of commerce, including the movement of people and goods, we get stuck with a bunch of tired old cronies squawking like chicken littles about how the sky is gonna fall if we implement any of those fancy, newfangled contraptions.
You know when the railroad first appeared in America there were people who said that the human body could not withstand high speeds in excess of 20 or 30 mph. I guess some of those people are still around. Luckily they are a minority.


Posted by trappings over substance, a resident of Evergreen Park
on Oct 16, 2010 at 8:06 pm

"California is not some barefoot hillbilly backwater, lallygagging along the bayou. WE are a dynamic world leader on many fronts and must compete on the global stage for a share of the world's commerce. While nations around the world are moving forward to update their systems of commerce, including the movement of people and goods..."

This really displays naivete. It is like putting in a very expensive wiring system into the walls of a city government building in order to keep up with the Joneses, only to find that current technology needs different, or no, built-in wiring. Choosing any old type of high speed rail without careful consideration of the exact impact and future needs is typical government misallocation of funds to show how "with it" we are.

Part of the thinking has to be the hard work of making local mass transportation infrastructure work. If we can't make it work for airports, we can't make it work for HSR.

Part of the thinking has to be the hard work of analyzing where the real jobs and economic impact will be. If it advances China's HRS building industry, how does that help us?

Part of the thinking has to be the hard work of building a business model that pays out and doesn't provide long term stress on our inflamed budget problems.

But none of this work has been done. We just want to show that "California is not some barefoot hillbilly backwater." Actually, building HSR as currently planned shows that we are exactly that. We don't understand transportation, its technology, and its economic impact enough to consider them in our thoughts!


Posted by Requirements for HSR, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Oct 18, 2010 at 4:50 pm

Why would you require this work to be done for HSR? It's not done for road work or airports.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

 

Registration now open

The Palo Alto Weekly Moonight Run & Walk is happening September 16 at the Palo Alto Baylands.

register here