Palo Alto Weekly

Real Estate - June 4, 2010

Correction

In the Spring Real Estate special section (April 23, 2010), the RentWatch columnist correctly advised that the letter writer would not be entitled to enforce the lease with the writer's father. However, the answer incorrectly advised that a 3-day notice given to this writer would be sufficient. The answer should have stated that assuming one is not protected by the new federal law, one is still a tenant under California law in light of the facts described, such as paying rent. If one is a tenant under California law, one is entitled to a 60-day written notice under a special foreclosure statute, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1161b. The letter writer, who is already in court, can file a written answer to the eviction case, raising the failure to give the 60-day notice as a defense. The Weekly regrets the error. To request a correction, contact Managing Editor Jocelyn Dong at 650-223-6511, jdong@paweekly.com or P.O. Box 1610, Palo Alto, CA 94302.

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields