Palo Alto Weekly

News - June 21, 2006

Classic Communities gets council OK

Residents' appeal of 'futuristic' design and potential traffic impacts of West Bayshore project fails to sway officials

by Bill D'Agostino

Shortly after Monday night tripped into early Tuesday morning, the Palo Alto City Council gave the go-ahead to a developer's plan to demolish two office buildings and construct 96 units of housing on West Bayshore Road.

Four sets of residents had appealed the planning director's decision to approve the 6.5-acre development planned by Classic Communities. They and other critics who spoke during Monday's three-hour public hearing argued the project, on the corner of Loma Verde Avenue, would negatively impact the area's traffic and overwhelm nearby schools with new students.

Many also argued the city was only taking a piecemeal look at individual housing projects rather than considering the cumulative effect of it and numerous other large nearby developments.

Since the council was primarily reviewing the project's design, neighbors spoke about the development's look too. They complained Classic Communities was using cheap-looking materials, including corrugated steel. Some had derisively called the design "futuristic."

"It's totally out of character with our neighborhood," Loma Verde Avenue resident Stiv Ostenberg said.

"Not so long ago being called futuristic would have been a compliment," replied Scott Ward, vice president of Classic Communities.

The city's Architectural Review Board had narrowly approved the project's design earlier this year, with a 3-2 vote.

"This did not receive a resounding A+ approval, but it did receive a passing grade," architectural-board vice-chair David Solnick said. The board had asked for some minor design issues to return for its approval later, which will now happen.

Councilman Bern Beecham hoped to have planning staff again review the design, to make it more "traditional." But most other council members decided they did not want to be judging aesthetics.

"It's not our business," Councilwoman Dena Mossar said. "It's not good community planning."

The council's vote was 8-1, with Councilwoman LaDoris Cordell voting against the project. She agreed with appellants that the project should have had a more complete analysis of the environment impacts.

Over the last year, the council has been taking steps to address residents' concerns that numerous south Palo Alto housing projects will overwhelm the area with new residents. It's updating sections of the city's long-range land-use plans to examine such new developments' impacts. It's moving towards exempting housing from commercial zones in the city.

Last October, the council made it more difficult for housing to be built on industrial land, such as on West Bayshore Road. However, that action "grandfathered" in applications that had already been submitted, such as Classic Communities

"If we set up rules, we have to follow them," Councilman Larry Klein said.

Supporters of the Classic Communities project included the League of Women Voters of Palo Alto and the Housing Action Coalition.

Staff Writer Bill D'Agostino can be reached at bdagostino@paweekly.com.

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields