|Fall Real Estate 2002
Downsizing or rightsizing?
by Carol Blitzer
Harold (Skip) Justman was only 50 when he and his wife, Gail, sold
their large Crescent Park house in 1998 and moved with their four
children into a smaller one in downtown Palo Alto.
Suddenly, mowing the lawn, fixing the roof and keeping the big
house clean no longer seemed as appealing as their children grew
The Justmans had purchased the Crescent Park home about 10 years
before, so were paying post-Proposition 13 property tax of 1 percent
of purchase price (plus annual inflation). The taxes on their new
home were actually less than what they'd been paying.
Justman is a real estate lawyer who writes a monthly column for
the Palo Alto Weekly on real estate and tax issues. He said he has
heard a lot of stories from people who worried that they couldn't
get into a smaller place in the same community without paying as
much as they sold their old home for.
For the Justman family, the issues boiled down to the convenience
of living in a smaller, more centrally located home versus the liabilities
of capital gains and property taxes.
The Justmans decided not to wait until the nest was empty. They
moved just as their oldest child was going off to college; two others
were in high school and one in elementary school.
Upkeep on the new home is significantly easier. "I always
did my own landscape gardening, but that gets tiresome after a while.
Now we have bushes and plants, but no lawn. We used to have a huge
lawn -- I filled three garbage bags with clippings every time I
mowed the lawn. It was a lot of work," he said.
In addition, painting a large, two-story home was a "big event."
Now it can be done on a ladder. "We don't need scaffolding.
It's less intimidating to do things to the house," he added.
Justman grew up in Palo Alto and really wanted to stay nearby.
Gail recently started working as a teacher's assistant with special-education
"She's just now starting a career that's fulfilling for her;
we didn't want to move and give that up," he said.
"Having just done it, I can tell you there's a lot of emotional
trauma associated with selling a house you've lived in for over
10 years. You just put down roots and it's traumatic to go through
re-registering for voting, changing your mailing address with all
your magazines -- there's a lot involved," he said.
Not to mention getting rid of things.
Justman and his family found themselves sorting through clothing,
sports equipment and furniture -- asking themselves if they really
need it. "There's so much we hold on to. If we really needed
it, we could replace it," he said, mentioning his family's
leftover paint cans and collection of old nuts and
"The kids are just as happy in the smaller house. They're
certainly happier with the location," he said.
Some people are concerned with what their friends will think, if
they give up their big house, but Justman said his family was "thrilled"
to be within walking distance of downtown Palo Alto.
"That was the big payoff. Yeah, we're in a smaller house,
but we're happier and can walk downtown for dinner; my kids can
walk to school," he said.
Will the new house be big enough over time? What about holidays?
"We'll all go out for dinner! What if the kids come back and
visit? I'll rent a hotel room.
"Do I really want to continue to pay $10,000 per year in property
taxes just so the kids will have a place to come back and visit?...
Keeping a big house just so the kids can come visit is not the right
economic decision. The right economic decision is to get rid of
the big house," he said.
For most homeowners, the issue of downsizing doesn't arise until
age 55, when more lenient tax rules kick in.
Justman said that, under current law, if you're married and filing
a joint return, the first $500,000 in capital gains is tax free
(both federal and state). The excess is taxed, but at a maximum
rate of 20 percent for federal taxes. (Capital gains is figured
on the difference between the selling price and what
"I did not find that to be an onerous tax," he said.
"When I sold in 1998, my gain was more than $500,000, but the
tax wasn't all that burdensome, given you were given $500,000 free
to begin with."
A second issue is property taxes. Those who purchased their homes
before Proposition 13 (1978) enjoy a very low tax rate. "If
you've lived in the house for a long time, your taxes are fairly
reasonable," he said. Those who purchased in the 1980s also
pay far less taxes than they would for a home at
"You could sell an old house in Palo Alto and carry over the
assessed (property tax) basis from old house to new house and (there
would be) no change to property tax," he said. That is certainty
if the person is moving within the same county. If moving from Santa
Clara County to San Mateo
"Each county gets to decide if it wants to accept a low assessment
for a new immigrant to its county," he added.
Giving up the big house isn't for everyone, Justman acknowledged.
"If it's a rising market and you have a $2 million home and
the market goes up 10 percent, you've made $200,000. If it's a rising
market and your house is worth $1 million and goes up 10 percent,
you've only made $100,000. The bigger homes can capture bigger appreciation.
"But the flip side of that is when the market goes bad, the
bigger homes lose more value," he said.
"I sold in July '98 expecting the market had peaked. I was
off by two years, but selling in July 1998 (snaps fingers) like
that was a better experience than trying to catch the peak and miss
it and sit on the house for nine months," he added.
"The replacement house is appreciating, not as much as the
big house. If you sell and buy and replace in Palo Alto, you're
still catching the appreciation. I could have gotten more in March
2000 than in '98. If I'd sold in '98 and put it in T-bills (or tech
stocks), I'd have been hurt," he added. Even with the best
financial reasons in the world for selling, moving still wasn't
easy, Justman reiterated: It was "hard to do it at 50. I know
(I) wouldn't have the emotional energy to do it at 60. Death, divorce,