Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!


Palo Alto Online Town Square Google
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
Palo Alto Online News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

City Council to consider housing impact
Stanford expansion projects expected to bring 3,200 jobs to the city

Listen to the Palo Alto City Council meeting live when the council is in session (usually Monday nights at 7 p.m.) via the KZSU Webcast.

Share
The Stanford University Medical Center's expansion project is still in its amoeba phase, but city officials are already scrambling to determine who would be responsible to house the influx of hospital workers the project would bring.

In recent weeks, the city has released a "housing needs analysis" report for both the hospital project and the proposed expansion of Stanford Shopping Center. The Planning and Transportation Commission discussed the subject at two recent meetings, and the City Council will hold a study session on housing needs at its meeting Monday.

According to the analysis prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., the hospital project would bring 2,242 new jobs to the medical center. Stanford Hospital and Clinics would get 1,251 new workers while the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital would get 891. The report also estimated that 100 non-Stanford employees would lease space at the new facilities.

The shopping center is expected to bring in 958 new employees.

A total of 1,856 housing units would be needed in the region to meet the needs generated by the expansion — 1,301 for medical-center employees and 555 for shopping-center workers, the report stated.

Now, the question city officials are trying to answer is: Should Stanford assume responsibility for housing these workers?

Arthur Keller, a commissioner on the planning board, argued at last week's meeting that Stanford should play a major role in solving the housing problem. He acknowledged, as did the Keyser analysis, that many of the workers will commute to Palo Alto from other cities. But he disputed the notion that this means Stanford should only worry about housing the small percentage of workers who would move here.

"The impacts that are not paid for by Stanford are either borne by the rest of us in the City of Palo Alto through higher taxes and more expenditure, or ... are borne unmitigated by other residents and businesses of the City of Palo Alto."

"Stanford should be dealing with the high impact of that development, whether those people choose to live in Palo Alto or elsewhere," Keller later added.

The $2.5 billion hospital project includes major additions and renovations to both Stanford Hospital & Clinics and the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital. The main hospital would add about 824,000 square feet of space and 144 beds. Its emergency department would more than double in size.

The Children's Hospital, meanwhile, would add 104 beds and about 441,000 square feet of space, including areas where families can stay with children during the recovery period.

Stanford Hospital officials have long touted the need to expand the overcrowded facilities and disputed the idea that the hospital should be providing housing for its workers. Earlier this week, Stanford Hospital released a "community benefits summary" detailing the hospital's contributions to the community. Besides providing world-class emergency care and advanced patient care, the report noted, the new facilities would ensure that the region continues to produce medical breakthroughs and provide the region with economic benefits such as jobs and employee spending.

At recent meetings with community and business leaders, Stanford Hospital officials said the hospital is not in the housing business and argued that the dialogue should focus on the need to expand the overcrowded facilities.

"This idea that we should look to our health care institutions to take on other community needs is certainly something that we will continue to raise as an important point for discussion," said Shelley Hebert, the hospital's executive director for public affairs.

Hebert also noted that while the housing-needs analysis is an important first step, the city's environmental impact review for the project won't be available until early next year. The report, she said, is needed for any informed discussion on the topic to take place.

The project still needs a series of local and state approvals before construction begins. Construction is expected to take about five years.


Comments

Posted by Steve C., a resident of Menlo Park, on Nov 10, 2008 at 6:26 pm

Are you kidding? No one can seriously think they can afford to live in this area on the money they will earn at a shopping mall, so you can stop worrying about those folks. Maybe the doctors and the couples who work at the hospital, but they had better be DINKS(Double-Income-No-Kids). Otherwise, they are commuters.


Posted by chris, a resident of the University South neighborhood, on Nov 10, 2008 at 10:29 pm

Steve C.,

Haven't you noticed that house prices are dropping and jobs are disappearing? We should thank Stanford for providing replacement jobs. Is a business required to provide housing for its workers?

Why not ask HP and Facebook to provide housing for their workers?


Posted by No room at Stanford, a resident of the Esther Clark Park neighborhood, on Nov 11, 2008 at 6:07 am

If Stanford are required to build housing, where are they going to put it? The historical associations won't allow building near Leland Stanford's historic stables and the golfing community won't allow destruction of the historic golf course for housing.

The only available land Stanford has is West of Foothill Expressway. Do we want the hills covered with five story condo blocks?


Posted by Paul, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Nov 11, 2008 at 1:15 pm

Why doesn't Stanford just build its new stuff in Stockton or Tracy or Fresno or somewhere else where its employees live and the construction costs are cheaper? After all, when they built the university here this was the sticks.


Posted by Rick, a resident of the Charleston Gardens neighborhood, on Nov 11, 2008 at 9:25 pm

Stanford sould build a few thousand housing units on land they own. It would only take a small area of the land between Foothill Exp/==== other name near Stanford and Hwy 280.

Palo Alto would fight it as "Their Developers" don't own it (Greenbelt Alliance,etc) and so wouldn't make 10's of millions $$ in profits.


Posted by Resident, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Nov 11, 2008 at 9:56 pm

Other nearby cities like Menlo Park, Redwood City, Mt. View, and cities north and south of here can absorb a lot of these new employees.

There are many affordable apartments in neighboring cities.

Why must Palo Alto and Stanford provide housing for their new employees. The commute is neither far, nor difficult.

Many people have been riding the train from PA to SF to work for more than 50 years.


Posted by NotJustMe, a resident of the Leland Manor/Garland Drive neighborhood, on Nov 12, 2008 at 9:22 am

The city can't even get the Oregon expressway straight, why they're concern about the housing. It's all about the special interest dream again! The TOP priority now should be fixing the Crime and safety issues for the city. It can only goes from bad to worse as the current econ crisis.


Add a Comment

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *

2007 Awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association

Palo Alto Weekly

First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story

Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information

The Almanac

First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage

Second Place
Environmental Reporting

Mountain View Voice

Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design

 

landscape garden design
graphics and computer consulting support
state quarter trading
Palo Alto Online   © 2010 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.