Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!


Palo Alto Online Town Square Google
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
Palo Alto Online News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Stanford Medical Center to ban smoking  

Share
Stanford Medical Center will ban smoking on its campus, including outdoor areas, beginning Sept. 1, university officials announced today.

The ban will not apply to Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, which have designated smoking areas outside. Smoking is not allowed in either hospital.

The ban applies to all other medical center buildings, including the patio and seating areas at the Clark Building, the psychiatry building on Quarry Road, and other buildings in the area bounded by Welch Road, Pasteur Drive and Campus Drive West.

"It is my hope that this expansion of our official smoking policy will signal to the tobacco industry our nearly universal abhorrence of its practices and our commitment to promoting the health of our community," said Philip Pizzo, dean of the School of Medicine.

A study by Stanford researchers published in May found that non-smokers sitting in outdoor cafes and parks could be exposed to significant levels of toxins from nearby smokers.

"A lot of people might assume that the smoke is very dilute and just floats away immediately," said Neil Klepeis, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering and lead author of the study.

Only 4 percent of Stanford employees smoke, according to data from the Stanford Health and Lifestyle Assessment. The university will offer a new benefit Sept. 1 to employees or their family members who want to quit smoking.


Comments

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Aug 22, 2007 at 5:22 pm

I don't necessarily agree with banning smoking in public parks, but this type of ban is definitely a good idea. I am one of those people who end up holding their breath as they exit a business building as the air just outside is so foul. It isn't just the smoking employees that are hanging about just outside smoking and on their cell phones, but also visitors and others on legitimate reasons to call at the building who just have to finish their fag before entering.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Aug 22, 2007 at 6:03 pm

Occasional ventilated smoking rooms would be a bit less fascist, and would do an adequate job keeping the smoke from non-smokers.


Posted by Robert Jackler, a resident of Stanford, on Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58 am

It has always troubled me when young people see people in lab coats, surgical scrubs, nursing smocks, or even simply wearing a medical center ID smoking. It is easy for kids to conclude that if medical folks make this choice, with all that they know about human health, then smoking must not be so bad after all. I beleive that all medical workers have a responsibility, if they choose to smoke, to do so out of the public eye.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Aug 23, 2007 at 5:54 pm

Difficult when they are not allowed an area. I want the Copenhagen concession. This abstemiousness is inappropriate.


Posted by Smoker At Stanford, a resident of Stanford, on Aug 25, 2007 at 9:10 am

Of note--if smoking/cigarettes are so bad, then why does the Dean continue to allow the tobacco companies to contribute funds to the med. center? Is it a bit arrogant/narrow-minded to force the issue?

I appreciate the concern for all and am always considerate of trash/others/etc. I smoke outside, >than 20 ft. away from any doors, on an outside walkway out of public access; so, the argument about the public/children viewing my bad habit is invalid. In fact, the public is in contact with the hospital smokers and other public smokers. I so admit I have a filthy habit fed by physical, emotional and spritual imperfection. The drugs prescribed by the medial field can be said to be very dangerous to a person's health also. We also weigh the benfits and risks (this is a personal choice). I will now be nervous and find it hard to function--may even get fired because cigarettes soothe and calm me down me when I have to deal with 'difficult' people.

Alcohol is also banned--but not enforced; there are regularly funded Friday afternoon 'happy hours' held at med school, hosted by faculty; without enforcement of this rule (EVER). Alcohol affects peoples behaviour and reasoning--what a better argument.


Add a Comment

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *

2007 Awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association

Palo Alto Weekly

First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story

Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information

The Almanac

First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage

Second Place
Environmental Reporting

Mountain View Voice

Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design

 

landscape garden design
graphics and computer consulting support
state quarter trading
Palo Alto Online   © 2010 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.