Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
Palo Alto Online News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Stanford 'rethinking' parts of El Camino plan
No timeframe yet for resubmitting Menlo Park proposal

Bookmark and Share
Stanford University and developer John Arrillaga are revising their plans for Menlo Park's empty car lots for a third time, according to project representatives.

In January the university submitted a site plan for replacing eight acres of car lots along 300 to 500 El Camino Real with a mixed-use complex of 96,000 square feet of medical offices, 133,500 square feet of offices, 10,000 square feet of retail, and two five-story apartment buildings containing up to 152 units.

The Menlo Park Planning Commission held a study session about the project on Jan. 28, fielding a couple dozen comments from residents unhappy with the potential traffic impacts and the scale of the complex compared with surrounding buildings.

The commission itself requested further analysis of the traffic impacts and retail parking, wondered whether the multi-story, modernistic design suited the city, and asked whether the project's Middle Avenue plaza is more a three-lane easement for cars accessing the complex instead of public space.

Now, the university might change the exact configuration of the site plan. "Stanford is considering the comments and suggestions received at the planning commission meeting," said Steve Elliott, managing director of real estate for the university. "Technically, the plans have not been 'withdrawn' but at this preliminary stage, we are working on potential revisions to our submittal."

While he declined to go into detail about what changes could be made, he said the project team is evaluating issues raised at the commission meeting, including traffic issues, the design for a plaza on Middle Avenue, the architecture of the office buildings, and the inclusion of medical offices.

"Right now we don't have a specific time frame for submitting these (revisions) to the city," Elliott said.

During the Planning Commission study session, Mr. Elliot stated that the university acknowledged that Stanford "will need to contribute our fair share to" traffic mitigation in addition to paying traffic impact fees. "Drawing on our extensive transportation management experience, Stanford will create a comprehensive transportation demand management plan to reduce the project's traffic," he said.

Members of Save Menlo, a grassroots coalition that organized a petition opposing the project, sat down again with Stanford to discuss the complex in the days after the study session.

"We had a cordial meeting, and we appreciate how well they listened to us. However, Stanford gave us no indication what changes they might make to their plans," Perla Ni, Save Menlo spokeswoman, said.

The group said it reiterated concerns about safety, congestion, cut-through traffic, a car-free plaza and the housing imbalance, and plans to meet with Stanford again in a few weeks.

The Sierra Club also took a look at the proposal. According to an analysis by its Sustainable Land Use Committee, the eight-acre mixed-used complex in its January incarnation would create about 900 jobs -- about six times as many jobs as housing units if 152 apartments are built.

The club proposes slicing both medical and regular office space in half -- to about 114,750 square feet -- to create room to build 234 apartments in total. That yields a job-to-housing ratio of 2-to-1, which is the overall ratio for Menlo Park, according to the Sierra Club, and also helps reduce the traffic impact. With the city's current struggle to identify enough high-density housing sites to get back in compliance with state law -- and the promise of future demands for more sites -- the ratio may be an important parameter.

Whatever changes, the proposal will likely stay consistent with the baseline requirements of the specific plan to avoid triggering public benefit discussions. That leaves Menlo Park without much control over the project, since the only approval required will be the Planning Commission signing off on architectural details.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by So Confused, a resident of another community, on Feb 19, 2013 at 2:20 pm

Not long ago roads were narrowed to slow traffic... now they want more buildings???? Doesn't the addition of building mean more traffic???

With narrow roads this slow traffic could also clog the freeway and we just got that fixed.

Somebody is not thinking...


Posted by Do something....., a resident of the Greater Miranda neighborhood, on Feb 19, 2013 at 3:04 pm

Something needs to be done with the eyesore that is the abandoned car lots! Just make it attractive and low-profile, and back a ways from the sidewalk so it isn't in your face.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Feb 19, 2013 at 3:10 pm

While they are at it, they should reconsider the ridiculous intersection at SandHill/ElCamino/Alma and allow through traffic across SandHill/Alma. This would alleviate some of the problems at T & C and also some of the Churchill traffic.


Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Feb 20, 2013 at 3:22 pm

Open up the Sand Hill/ECR/Alma intersection? Will never happen.

Actually, it will happen when Menlo Park finally builds the Willow Expressway that was supposed to be built between El Camino and the Dumbarton Bridge.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Feb 21, 2013 at 8:43 am

CP Dad

I'm interested in hearing why you say that opening up the Alma/ECR/Sand Hill, will never happening.

That mess must be partly responsible for rerouting through traffic to T&C and also to Churchill, both traffic headaches.

From south PA, the quickest way to Sand Hill or to parts of Stanford Shopping Center and hospital would be this intersection. Also SandHill to 101 would be much more direct by this route. Unfortunately, this sensible route is not available.

It causes traffic to use the Stanford Shopping Center parking lot as a short cut as well as traffic having to U Turn on ECR.

Getting traffic moving efficiently to where it wants to go, routing away from busy intersections and making school traffic on Churchill and Embarcadero safer (including bikes) must be an aim of our City. Translate "must be" to "making it a priority", when looking at potential traffic on any new downtown development.

I seem to remember that this intersection was changed relatively recently (10+ years??) and any reasonable thinking person could see that this has no advantage to anyone in this configuration.


Posted by Crescent Park Dad, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Feb 22, 2013 at 3:32 pm

The intersection was open back when Sand Hill terminated at the Nordstrom corner of the shopping center. There was no direct Sand Hill onto Alma back then...you had to weave your way through the shopping center parking lot to get to the intersection.

In fact there used to be a light for a 3-way intersection that was positioned at the center driveway off of ECR...running right up to the walk/entry that bisects the center (Bloomingdales on the left).

Long before the Sand Hill extension was initiated, Menlo Park was supposed to create the Willow Expressway. The was that the Willow Expressway would have complemented the Oregon Expressway as the direct roads to 101.

Frankly, the attitude is --- MP you're not doing your fair share of getting cars from West/East, we've done our bit.

The result of opening up the Alma intersection would be massive cut-through of Downtown North. There would be a massive environmental impact lawsuit. That's why it won't happen.

Menlo Park should hold up their end of their 1960's promise/bargain.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.