Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
Palo Alto Online Sports
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Overtime loss stings Stanford football  

Photo

Bookmark and Share
Stepfan Taylor wasn't given the one yard he wanted, the one yard he thought he had earned by continually churning his legs and reaching the ball into the end zone.

"I thought he got in on the play before that," Stanford quarterback Josh Nunes said. "The game was made up of a bunch of tough plays, a bunch of close plays."

Touchdown Jesus must have had a careful eye on the field Saturday as the Notre Dame defense turned back Taylor's attempt to send it to a second overtime. At least, that's what the refs ruled.

"He's a tough kid. He just keeps his legs turning," Stanford coach David Shaw said. "He gets as many yards as he can on every single play. Every single play to him, he runs it like it's life or death. I love that about him. He's one of guys that is the heartbeat of our team."

Nationally No. 17-ranked Stanford dropped a 20-13 decision to the host Irish in a nonconference football contest in South Bend, ending a three-game winning streak over No. 7 Notre Dame and likely ending Stanford's chances to play in a BCS bowl game unless the Cardinal can get to, and win, the Pac-12 championship game.

Any lingering regrets from its second loss in as many road games can't last very long. The Big Game arrives early this year, occurring next Saturday in Berkeley, set for a 12:15 p.m. kickoff.

Taylor, who rushed for a total of 102 yards on 28 carries, ran the ball five consecutive times during Stanford's bid in overtime to knot the game.

Notre Dame was ready. Irish fans can to sweat out a review of the play before fans spilled onto the field in celebration of Notre Dame's first 6-0 start in 10 years.

For Stanford, there are several questions. For the second time in as many games away from home, the Cardinal offense stuttered and stalled. Josh Nunes was limited to 125 passing yards and failed to throw a touchdown pass. He did, however, throw two interceptions.

The Cardinal scored 13 points in a loss at Washington earlier in the season and matched that on Saturday. In fact, the defense has scored every touchdown on the road.

Jordan Williamson's 27-yard field goal, his second of the game, with 6:12 put the Cardinal up 13-10, and the Fighting Irish drove into Cardinal territory when a personal foul by Usua Amanam costing the Stanford defender 15 yards.

Two of the nation's best defenses figured to dictate the game on a gray, rainy day and they didn't disappoint.

Notre Dame defensive tackle Stephon Tuitt was in the Stanford backfield all day and Manti Te'o was all over Stanford ballcarriers.

On the other side, Shayne Skov and Ben Gardner (who recovered a Notre Dame fumble in the end zone for the lone Cardinal TD) gave the Irish very little room to operate.

"It's probably one of the hardest losses I've felt," Thomas said. "that and the Fiesta Bowl are about the same. Our guys fought really hard and it felt bad that we couldn't come up with a W today."

The Irish got their offense going in the third quarter, outgaining Stanford 114-19, but couldn't get any points. They finally found the end zone on the first play of the fourth quarter.

Nunes, Taylor and the Cardinal responded with their best drive of the game, a methodical 16-play, 65-yard march that took 8:03 off the clock and reached the Notre Dame 3. The Irish got a stop on third down. Williamson's 27-yard field goal made it 13-10 with 6:12 left. Williamson's career-best 48-yarder came in the second quarter for a 10-3 lead and he missed a 25-yarder earlier when Stanford failed to get the ball on the left hash mark for a better angle.

Stanford had enough chances to put points on the board before even getting to OT, but didn't happen. Even the last series, with the ball on the Irish one-yard line had promise with Taylor twisting into the line, staying on top of other players and then reaching the ball over the goal line to no avail.

"I didn't get a view of the last play," Shaw said. "Stepfan swore to me that he got it. That he got over the goal line on the second effort. The officials looked at it and said he didn't get in, so he didn't get in."

Stanford, however, telegraphed the final plays in overtime, seemingly daring the Irish to stop the run up the middle. When all was said and done, Notre Dame did just that.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by rip off, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Oct 13, 2012 at 8:57 pm

Taylor clearly scored a touchdown on the last play, but the officials were poorly positioned and didn't see it then weren't willing to overturn their ruling after review after the home crowd already started running on to the field.


Posted by G. McGuan, a resident of another community, on Oct 14, 2012 at 1:30 pm

Replay certainly appeared to show a score, but there's no sound. Dies anyone believe Manti T'eo (in the foreground of the most decisive shot) is actually walking away from the pile unless the whistle had blown and the play was over? No one one seems to understand that, but all other views of that last play show the ND squad starting to celebrate before Taylor's final squirm over the goal line. The whistle had certainly ended the game before Taylor put that ball across.


Posted by Ralph, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Oct 15, 2012 at 8:43 am

There was no whistle......the play was alive.....the refs just blew it. Even the NFL rules guy that TV uses for controversial calls -- Mike Pereira -- said the refs made a mistake. His blog is on MSN.com.


Posted by Bert , a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Oct 15, 2012 at 12:53 pm

For the Cardinal coach or OC to call 4 straight running plays from the 3 yard line in OT -- ALL up the gut/middle, ALL with ND knowing and aligned for what's coming, and ALL with ND knowing who will be carrying the ball -- is pathetic. Why be surprised that on those final 4 downs the Cardinal accumulated at most 3 yards (even if the refs blew it on the last two runs)? Shaw keeps saying "that's who we are and that's what we'll continue to do." But I submit that in this instance the play calling turned his oft-stated commitment to the run into a fault, viz., being predictable, hence stoppable by one of the nation's best defenses against the run. It was a tough loss, especially since the Cardinal D played so hard and so well all game. I predicted (and predict) 7-5 or 6-6 for the year, and NOT because the team doesn't have solid talent.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.